On 30.07.17 10:21, techlist06 wrote:
Subject: Re: Deciphering maillog transaction that resulted in reply to
spammer
...are you receiving spam messages with NOTIFY=SUCCESS?
(I don't see bounce of this message in logs)
Instead of trying to decipher one with a problem, can someone check my laymen
descriptions of this single good message flow for me? I've tried to do my
homework and get them right. I think I have it, but would be grateful for
confirmation.
I have after-que content filtering setup, using amavisd-new. I have a
pre-cleanup and a regular cleanup service. The steps I'm a little shaky on
I have prefixed with "???" in the comments.
(Posted via nabble, hopefully that prevents any wrapping issues)
it does not prevent from wrapping where it should not, but at least it did
not merge lines...
# ??? Postfix gets connection from amavis on normal smtpd to send filtered
message. That message gets new QID? #230F69E7
Jul 30 11:18:13 mail1 postfix/smtpd[3498]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Jul 30 11:18:13 mail1 postfix/smtpd[3498]: 230F69E7:
client=localhost[127.0.0.1], orig_queue_id=F1F5B14D5,
orig_client=mail.myserver.com[1.1.1.1]
correct
# ??? new queue of filtered message #230F69E7 from amavis
correct
# ??? postfix reports it got a message via lmtp from amavis (10024), and it
has sent it, although I think it actually sent the filtered version 230F69E7
per local delivery log line that follows
Jul 30 11:18:13 mail1 postfix/lmtp[3495]: F1F5B14D5:
to=<bsm...@mail1.myserver.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024,
delay=0.18, delays=0.03/0.01/0.01/0.13, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 230F69E7)
this is the original mail that was sent to amavis and amavis just confirmed
that it was successfully delivered back to postfix.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
