On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:25:33AM -0500, Brian Collins wrote:
> > So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> > postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> > centos 5
>
> Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine
> So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> centos 5
Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine,
keeping that up for all the RPM-based distros would be quite a feat.
How
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
>>
>> So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
>> postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
>> centos 5
>
> The authentic Postfix source code is released via
> http://www.postfix.org/
ram:
> > With all Postfix versions, the postmap command by default always
> > case folds CDB lookup keys, both on create and on query.
> >
> > If someone is distributing "improved" Postfix versions then you
> > need to file a complaint.
> >
>
> So that seems to be it. I would really need to comp
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> > >
> > > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
> > > > cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > > r.
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> > >
> > > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
> > > > cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > > r..
ram:
>
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > r...@netcore.co.in
> > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:
ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>>
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>>> r...@netcore.co.in
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/p
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > r...@netcore.co.in
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> r...@netcore.co.in
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> [r...@50.133 postfix]#
Well, that's not how CDB tables work here, l
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 06:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > if I use
> >virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> > This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
>
> Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
> Postfix logging.
>
> Wietse
I di
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:25:10PM +0530, ram wrote:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
"This doesn't work" is a very skimpy problem description.
> But if I use
> check_recipient_access cdb:/path/valid_recipient
ram:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
Postfix logging.
Wietse
13 matches
Mail list logo
