On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 03:31:05 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
But in that case probably LDA is the best place to do such change. Some
time ago I was doing something similar via procmail.
I found a great program for procmail:
https://fex.belwue.de/fstools/#aw2re
It fixes the subject and can remov
Stephan Seitz:
> On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 03:31:05 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> >But in that case probably LDA is the best place to do such change. Some
> >time ago I was doing something similar via procmail.
>
> Yes, I could do the same with procmail. But procmail will probably like
> postfix us
On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 03:31:05 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
But in that case probably LDA is the best place to do such change. Some
time ago I was doing something similar via procmail.
Yes, I could do the same with procmail. But procmail will probably like
postfix use the encoded subject, so I
On 11/8/19 6:31 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> If you do it on incoming mail only, and after DKIM signature has already
> been verified, then I think there's no problem. Am I right?
Not always, because some people use tools that verify the signature
later on, such as this one:
https://github.com/li
Dnia 8.11.2019 o godz. 15:23:52 Stephan Seitz pisze:
>
> But the warning about breaking DKIM signatures if I change the
> subject line is of course a valid one.
If you do it on incoming mail only, and after DKIM signature has already
been verified, then I think there's no problem. Am I right?
B
On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 03:11:34 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
If I understand the OP correctly, he is trying to solve the problem of
e-mail clients using other prefixes instead of "Re:" for replies (for
example "AW:" or "Odp:" - these are among a few I encountered myself). When
you exchange emails
Dnia 8.11.2019 o godz. 14:27:18 Christian Kivalo pisze:
>
> I don't think that postfix is the right tool for this job, on the other
> hand I don't really see the problem you're trying to solve.
If I understand the OP correctly, he is trying to solve the problem of
e-mail clients using other pref
On November 8, 2019 1:53:13 PM GMT+01:00, Stephan Seitz
wrote:
>On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:44:53 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>>Has anyone an idea how I can debug this further? Or why it is only
>>sometimes working?
>
>I think I’ve found the problem. It happens if the subject has non-ASCII
>
>c
On Fr, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:44:53 +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Has anyone an idea how I can debug this further? Or why it is only
sometimes working?
I think I’ve found the problem. It happens if the subject has non-ASCII
characters to the line looks like:
=?UTF-8?Q?Aw=3A_Weinprobe_gut_=C3=BCber
Hi!
I’m using Debian 10 with postfix 3.4.5.
Trying to solve the problem with non-Re subjects I have found a regex for
header checks.
So I have a „/etc/postfix/header_check.pcre” with:
/eSubject:\s*((RE|AW|Aw|Antw|Antwort|RES|SV):\s*)+(.*)$/ REPLACE Subject: Re: $3
In main.cf:
header_checks =
10 matches
Mail list logo
