Re: Postscreen config

2013-04-29 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:48:00AM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote: > Am 2013-04-24 15:59, schrieb Tony Nelson: > >After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided > >to give it a try. > > > >I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html [1] > >as a leaping off p

Re: Postscreen config

2013-04-29 Thread Marko Weber | ZBF
Am 2013-04-24 15:59, schrieb Tony Nelson: After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided to give it a try. I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html [1] as a leaping off point, but chose to leave pipelining disabled until I'm sure I understand what I

Re: Postscreen config

2013-04-24 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:20:29AM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote: > I'm sorry Wietse, I did read that ,there is just a lot to take in. > > After re-reading it again, I see that these config options are what > caused it. > > postscreen_non_smtp_command_enable = yes > postscreen_bare_newline_action = e

RE: Postscreen config

2013-04-24 Thread Tony Nelson
> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:09 AM > To: Tony Nelson > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postscreen config > &g

Re: Postscreen config

2013-04-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Tony Nelson: > tnelson@njmail:/var/log$ grep i...@opulum.us mail.log > Apr 24 09:46:21 njmail postfix/postscreen[8764]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > [142.11.233.149]:21725: 450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable; > from=mailto:i...@opulum.us>>, > to=mailto:validu...@starp

Postscreen config

2013-04-24 Thread Tony Nelson
After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided to give it a try. I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html as a leaping off point, but chose to leave pipelining disabled until I'm sure I understand what I have going on. I definitely see some mail comi

"ideal" postscreen config (was: Re: postscreen MX Policy ...)

2011-06-05 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:24:40PM +0530, kshitij mali wrote: > Since till now i was using postfix 2.5 i am planning to upgrade to > 2.8 because i see 2 major feature multi -instance and postscreen > can any one give me with example of an ideal conguration . 2.8 is a very good idea. I can highly