Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:59 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > >> On 18 Aug 2015, at 06:55, Tom Browder wrote: >> >> So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact >> settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld >> (and any other suggested records)? ... > $ dig kreme.

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

> On 18 Aug 2015, at 06:55, Tom Browder wrote: > > So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact > settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld > (and any other suggested records)? $ dig kreme.com mx kreme.com. 86400 IN MX 10

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:26 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. >>> >>> Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for >>your server. >> >>It is! > > No, imo, it is not.. and this s

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:26 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. >>> >>> Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for >>your server. >> >>It is! > > No, imo, it is not.. and this s

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:17:33AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > On 18 Aug 2015, at 16:58, Jim Reid wrote: > > >On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder wrote: > > > >>Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following > >>DNS records appear reasonable? > > > >No. There should be just

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 16:58, Jim Reid wrote: On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder wrote: Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address. The only reason for that "should" is to avo

RE: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Greetz, Louis >-Oorspronkelijk bericht- >Van: tom.brow...@gmail.com >[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Tom Browder >Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2015 23:35 >Aan: Jim Reid >CC: postfix users >Onderwerp: Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain i

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:06, Tom Browder wrote: > >> Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: >> >> 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. > > Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for your server. It is! > BTW,

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:06, Tom Browder wrote: > Okay, I assume then that this should be the only PTR record: > > 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR B.tld. Yes. Provided of course B.tld is The One True Hostname for your server. BTW, you will get on a lot better if your postings used the actual IP add

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder wrote: > Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following > DNS records appear reasonable? No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address.

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > On 18 Aug 2015, at 21:55, Tom Browder wrote: >> Okay, now assuming my server IP address is 1.2.3.4, do the following >> DNS records appear reasonable? > > No. There should be just one PTR record for an IP address. Okay, I assume then that this s

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: >> Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain >> name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a "real" >> server and should not b

RE: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

phabet. Greetz, Louis >-Oorspronkelijk bericht- >Van: rwhee...@artifact-software.com >[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Ron Wheeler >Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2015 16:14 >Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org >Onderwerp: Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 08/18/2015 06:49 AM, Koko Wijatmoko wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:55:00 -0500 Tom Browder wrote: So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld (and any other suggested records)? this is not the best qu

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Ron Wheeler wrote: > The MX record has to point to an A or CNAME that maps to the actual machine > where your main service (Postfix) runs. IIRC the MX should not point to a CNAME as target host to make proper loop detection work. Or am I wrong? See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-5.1:

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

This is pretty common. The DNS does not matter all that much as long as people can find the MX server for each domain. The MX record has to point to an A or CNAME that maps to the actual machine where your main service (Postfix) runs. The A or CNAME can be in a different domain as long as that i

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:55:00 -0500 Tom Browder wrote: > So how should the DNS records look? Can anyone give me the exact > settings for the A, CNAME, MX, and PTR records for A.tld and B.tld > (and any other suggested records)? > this is not the best question on this list. google will guide you

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:36 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 16 Aug 2015, at 10:44 , Tom Browder wrote: >> Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name >> and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a "real" server >> and should not be treated as a virtu

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On 16 Aug 2015, at 10:44 , Tom Browder wrote: > Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain name > and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a "real" server > and should not be treated as a virtual domain? You need a reasonable helo name and you ne

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 1:59 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote: > > > Nothing of the sort. Just give the machine a sensible hostname > Whether that name has anything to do with your virtual domains or > not is irrelevant. Pick one of those names if you like, or use > some other domain name at your disposal. >

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 01:48:46PM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > Nothing of the sort. Just give the machine a sensible hostname > > that will be used as its smtp_helo_name and is the sole name in > > its PTR record. > > Viktor, thanks, but forgive my ignorance . All the domain names I own all >

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 12:24 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain > > name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a "real" > > server and should not be t

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > Okay, then I guess I should pick one of the virtual hosts as the domain > name and add some arbitrary host then. Does that mean it is then a "real" > server and should not be treated as a virtual domain? Nothing of the sort. Just giv

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 11:33 AM, "Wietse Venema" wrote: > > > If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname > > > should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. > > > > Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual > > domains, all of which s

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Tom Browder: > On Aug 16, 2015 10:57 AM, "Wietse Venema" wrote: > > If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname > > should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. > > Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual > domains, all of w

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

On Aug 16, 2015 10:57 AM, "Wietse Venema" wrote: > If this server will send mail directly to the internet, then myhostname > should be a name that resolves to the internet IP address. Well, the only mail that should be sent is from or through the virtual domains, all of which share the same IP ad

Re: Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Tom Browder: > Thanks to Mark Sapiro, one of the Mailman developers, in 2011 I was able > to get a set of mailing lists for multiple virtual hosts working, and now > I'm in the process of moving to a new server (with the latest versions of > Postfix and MM2 installed from src) and want to get a be

Postfix and Mailman 2 virtual alias domain integration

Thanks to Mark Sapiro, one of the Mailman developers, in 2011 I was able to get a set of mailing lists for multiple virtual hosts working, and now I'm in the process of moving to a new server (with the latest versions of Postfix and MM2 installed from src) and want to get a better feel for some of

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

Yup, thanks, '-i' did it on my spam filter. What happened was the filter originally called a shell script that called sendmail with -i. When I switched to directly invoking spamc which proxies sendmail, I didn't add back the -i right in master.cf Daniel . On 4/7/2011 5:08 AM, Matthias Andree

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:15:44AM -0400, Daniel Bromberg wrote: > Again the quoting problem of literal SMTP conversations embedded in a > message that is actually its own SMTP transaction. Move the trailing '.' in > by one space in order to not cut off your own message. This is wrong. SMTP cor

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:08:42 +0200 deconya articulated: > First of all, sorry for the inconvenience, I didn't know that I send > mails in html format. I change it for next mails. Perhaps you could also lose the "top posting" technique as well. It makes following this tread a lot harder than it ne

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

Hi Other doubt, If I use relay_recipient_maps, users that has accounts using ldap, can be affected? All mails when are validated goes to antispam server. How mailman needs to validate users,I don't know if creating this variable all users can be rejected. Thanks 2011/4/7 Matthias Andree : > Am 0

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

HI First of all, sorry for the inconvenience, I didn't know that I send mails in html format. I change it for next mails. For my problem Im using this guide https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Mailman but im viewing that uses relay_domains and I don't know If this point is necessary. If I use $my

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

Am 07.04.2011 10:11, schrieb deconya: > Hi list > > I have diferent mailman lists mounted and I detected a problem making > tests to access, If I use telnet using other mailserver (mailserver.es > ) I receive this information: > > telnet mail.mydomain.com

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

Am 07.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Daniel Bromberg: > On 4/7/2011 4:11 AM, deconya wrote: >> Hi list >> >> I have diferent mailman lists mounted and I detected a problem making >> tests >> to access, If I use telnet using other mailserver (mailserver.es) I >> receive >> this information: >> >> telnet mai

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

Hi I dont understand, I wrote something bad¿? Thanks 2011/4/7 Daniel Bromberg > On 4/7/2011 4:11 AM, deconya wrote: > >> Hi list >> >> I have diferent mailman lists mounted and I detected a problem making >> tests >> to access, If I use telnet using other mailserver (mailserver.es) I >> receiv

Re: problem using postfix and mailman

On 4/7/2011 4:11 AM, deconya wrote: Hi list I have diferent mailman lists mounted and I detected a problem making tests to access, If I use telnet using other mailserver (mailserver.es) I receive this information: telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 Trying 84.88.68.66... [SNIP] 354 End data with. subje

problem using postfix and mailman

Hi list I have diferent mailman lists mounted and I detected a problem making tests to access, If I use telnet using other mailserver (mailserver.es) I receive this information: telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 Trying 84.88.68.66... Connected to mail.mydomain.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 jupiter

Re: Postfix and Mailman, error message Sender address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;

Werner Schalk: > Dear all, > > I am running Postfix and Mailman on my server with MySQL as backend. It > works like a charm (including mailman) but for one domain (customerA.com) > the following error message is generating when the admin user maintains a > list and an email

Postfix and Mailman, error message Sender address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;

Dear all, I am running Postfix and Mailman on my server with MySQL as backend. It works like a charm (including mailman) but for one domain (customerA.com) the following error message is generating when the admin user maintains a list and an email is being generated (e.g. when adding/removing

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

Upon research I found that using a virtual transport may be causing this issue. Since I have virtual domains I am wondering if it is somehow possible to switch the transport based on the email coming in. In addition, as another option, I am wondering if I can switch the transport to local and stil

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 10/04/2010 07:41 PM, Christopher Koeber wrote: > > Just to give an update for everyone who can help: > > >1. The system uses an OpenLDAP database for virtual aliases. So my >virtual_alias_maps points to an LDAP lookup for this. >

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

On 10/04/2010 07:41 PM, Christopher Koeber wrote: Just to give an update for everyone who can help: 1. The system uses an OpenLDAP database for virtual aliases. So my virtual_alias_maps points to an LDAP lookup for this. 2. The domain for the Mailman setup as well as the actual email

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

Just to give an update for everyone who can help: 1. The system uses an OpenLDAP database for virtual aliases. So my virtual_alias_maps points to an LDAP lookup for this. 2. The domain for the Mailman setup as well as the actual email accounts is the same: 1. For example: I will

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, brian moore wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:17:35 -0400 > Christopher Koeber wrote: > > > > > > > > *OK, everytime I send to the allstudents list I have I get this: > > > > > > Sep 29 13:42:57 WTS-ZIMBRA postfix/virtual[27388]: 0CE72322739: to=< > > > allstude..

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

> > > Christopher Koeber wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > >> > >> > I am trying to get postfix working with mailman and I just can’t seem >> > to get it to work. >> > >> > >> > >> > Essentially what I want is this: >> > >> > >> > >> > My mailing domain is students.wesleyseminary.edu >> >

Re: Postfix and Mailman ...

Christopher Koeber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to get postfix working with mailman and I just can’t seem > to get it to work. > > > > Essentially what I want is this: > > > > My mailing domain is students.wesleyseminary.edu > . > > > > I want me

Postfix and Mailman ...

Hello, I am trying to get postfix working with mailman and I just can’t seem to get it to work. Essentially what I want is this: My mailing domain is students.wesleyseminary.edu. I want messages going to allstude...@students.wesleyseminary.edu to go to a mailman managed distribution lis

Rewrite header - Postfix and mailman

Hi, I'm trying to set Mailman 2.1.9 to handle multiple domains. 9? I have apply the patch from http://nxsy.org/139.html and this way I have a list called mydomain.com-list. The issue is that if I'm posting to mydomain.com-l...@mydomain.com everything seems to work fine. However, when posting

Re: postfix and mailman

David Mehler a écrit : > Hello, > I'm running a CentOS 5.4 machine and atempting to get postfix and > mailman going on it. This was working prior to a complete system > upgrade about 9 months ago, now it isn't, I'm getting an error 554 > user unknown message when the

postfix and mailman

Hello, I'm running a CentOS 5.4 machine and atempting to get postfix and mailman going on it. This was working prior to a complete system upgrade about 9 months ago, now it isn't, I'm getting an error 554 user unknown message when the user atempts to send back the confirmation em

Re: Postfix and mailman problems

Thanks it worked :) Guillaume HILT a écrit : Hi, I'm using mailman 2.1.11 on gentoo AMD64. It's running with postfix, dspam and virtual domains/users (managed by postfixadmin). My problem is that all emails sent to a mailing list fall in the catchall. I'm using a specifig subdomain for the

Re: Postfix and mailman problems

Guillaume HILT a écrit : >Hi, > > I'm using mailman 2.1.11 on gentoo AMD64. > It's running with postfix, dspam and virtual domains/users (managed by > postfixadmin). > > My problem is that all emails sent to a mailing list fall in the catchall. > I'm using a specifig subdomain for the lists,

Postfix and mailman problems

Hi, I'm using mailman 2.1.11 on gentoo AMD64. It's running with postfix, dspam and virtual domains/users (managed by postfixadmin). My problem is that all emails sent to a mailing list fall in the catchall. I'm using a specifig subdomain for the lists, ml.domain.com and I configured it wit