Fulvio Scapin:
> Thanks for the answer Viktor.
>
> As I mentioned, mine was an attempt to parse/validate the syntax
> externally, so I used the documentation as a guideline and probed with
> postmap to see what it would actually accept or not.
>
> I hope you will forgive me if I disagree on a spe
Thanks for the answer Viktor.
As I mentioned, mine was an attempt to parse/validate the syntax
externally, so I used the documentation as a guideline and probed with
postmap to see what it would actually accept or not.
I hope you will forgive me if I disagree on a specific case where I believe
th
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 03:13:01PM +0200, Fulvio Scapin wrote:
> But, as I mentioned at the beginning, the inline table is the one leaving
> me slightly confused.
The syntax is *simple* (minimal features, which is not always the
same as: intuitive or "easy to use", but generally not too far off
t
Fulvio Scapin:
> Hello to everyone.
>
> I've been trying to write a small parser to parse Postfix lookup table
> calls for a piece of code I am developing.
>
> I have taken a look at the source code and then resorted to postmap -q
> invocations to empirically test the descriptions at
> http://www
Hello to everyone.
I've been trying to write a small parser to parse Postfix lookup table
calls for a piece of code I am developing.
I have taken a look at the source code and then resorted to postmap -q
invocations to empirically test the descriptions at
http://www.postfix.org/DATABASE_README.ht
