On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:30:32AM +0200, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2011-04-29 Troy Piggins wrote:
> > Check out Victor's reply to my message. He explains the reason, but
> > I was finding the same as you. This works fine so far:
> >
> > if /^Subject:/
> > if !/=\?\S+\?=(\s|$)/
> > /\S{60}/
On 4/29/2011 6:17 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/29/2011 12:27 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Fri, April 29, 2011 4:15 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
#grep "{40}/" header_checks
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{40}/ REJECT no spaces in subject
but I'm having a couple issues:
and I'm still getting some, is t
On 4/29/2011 12:27 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Fri, April 29, 2011 4:15 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
#grep "{40}/" header_checks
/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{40}/ REJECT no spaces in subject
but I'm having a couple issues:
and I'm still getting some, is this that they have a 'CR' or several at
On 2011-04-29 Troy Piggins wrote:
> Check out Victor's reply to my message. He explains the reason, but
> I was finding the same as you. This works fine so far:
>
> if /^Subject:/
> if !/=\?\S+\?=(\s|$)/
> /\S{60}/REJECT no spaces
> endif
> endif
For the sake of simplicity:
if /^subjec
* Voytek Eymont wrote :
> I've followed the recent advice as I'm also getting a lot of
> these_long_subjects_emails_with_crap_in_them:
>
> --
> * Noel Jones wrote :
> > On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
> > >Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through m
On Fri, April 29, 2011 4:15 pm, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> #grep "{40}/" header_checks
> /^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{40}/ REJECT no spaces in subject
>
>
> but I'm having a couple issues:
and I'm still getting some, is this that they have a 'CR' or several at
the start ?
---
I've followed the recent advice as I'm also getting a lot of
these_long_subjects_emails_with_crap_in_them:
--
* Noel Jones wrote :
> On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
> >Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
> >postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassas
* Victor Duchovni wrote :
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:55PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> > 27.04.2011 15:44, Noel Jones wrote:
> > []
> > > regexp and pcre compatible expression:
> > >
> > > /^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
> > >
> > > matches Subject: followed by one or m
* Noel Jones wrote :
> On 4/27/2011 7:23 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
> >* Noel Jones wrote :
> >>On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
> >>regexp and pcre compatible expression:
> >>
> >>/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
> >
> >Thanks mate. That works beautifully. One minor improve
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:55PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 27.04.2011 15:44, Noel Jones wrote:
> []
> > regexp and pcre compatible expression:
> >
> > /^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
> >
> > matches Subject: followed by one or more spaces, followed by 60 or more
> > non-s
27.04.2011 15:44, Noel Jones wrote:
[]
> regexp and pcre compatible expression:
>
> /^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces
>
> matches Subject: followed by one or more spaces, followed by 60 or more
> non-space characters.
This will reject mime-encoded quoted-printable subjects.
/mjt
On 4/27/2011 7:23 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
* Noel Jones wrote :
On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces
* Wietse Venema wrote :
> Troy Piggins:
> > Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
> > postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
> > lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
> >
> > Subject:
> > DownloadLaetstMMiic
* Noel Jones wrote :
> On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
> >Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
> >postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
> >lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
> >
> >Subject:
> >
On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
Subject:
DownloadLaetstMMiicrosoftAndAppleSotfta
Troy Piggins:
> Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
> postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
> lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
>
> Subject:
> DownloadLaetstMMiicrosoftAndAppleSotftawreAndSaveThouasad
Hi there. I'm noticing lately most of the spam that gets through my
postgrey/postfix/amavis/spamassassin/procmail rules contains subject
lines that are extremely long strings with no spaces in them. eg:
Subject:
DownloadLaetstMMiicrosoftAndAppleSotftawreAndSaveThouasadnds.ApprvoedLicecnseddS
T
Erik de Castro Lopo put forth on 3/7/2011 4:50 PM:
> Given the above data, I think I am justified in using the following
> pcre rule:
>
> /^Received-SPF:.*helo=[a-z0-9.-]+\.mail\\.yahoo\.com;
> envelope-from=[^@]+@att.net/i REJECT
This is possibly less complex, totally effective, and p
Noel Jones wrote:
> take a look at milter-regexp.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Cheers,
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
On 3/7/2011 4:57 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
DKIM signatures are also added in messages handled
by lists, ... What you are attemtping to do is a bad idea based on a
deep misconception of the role of DKIM in email processing.
I think I have a fair handle on it. Ho
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > DKIM signatures are also added in messages handled
> > by lists, ... What you are attemtping to do is a bad idea based on a
> > deep misconception of the role of DKIM in email processing.
>
> I think I have a fair handle on it. However, my opinion on DKIM
> is that
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> You are lucky this does not work.
This is my own private mail server that serves me and my immediate
family. If I break stuff everyone on the receiviing end knows who
to complain to.
> Much of the att.net mail infrastructure
> is operated by Yahoo.
Over the last many mo
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:39:29AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
>
> I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
> to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
&
Le 07/03/2011 00:39, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
>
> I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
> to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
> b
Erik de Castro Lopo:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
>
> I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
> to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
> but a Message-ID endin
On 3/6/2011 5:47 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 03/07/2011 12:39 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should.
I'm trying
to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its fro
On 3/6/2011 5:39 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
but a Message-ID ending in 'yahoo.
On 03/07/2011 12:39 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
but a Message-ID ending in 'y
Hi all,
I'm running postfix version 2.8.1 from Debian.
I've got basic pcre header checks working as they should. I'm trying
to reject mail that has a DKIM signature that says its from att.net
but a Message-ID ending in 'yahoo.com'.
I've got this:
if /^DKI
29 matches
Mail list logo
