* Noel Jones wrote : > On 4/27/2011 7:23 AM, Troy Piggins wrote: > >* Noel Jones wrote : > >>On 4/27/2011 6:17 AM, Troy Piggins wrote: <snip /> > >>regexp and pcre compatible expression: > >> > >>/^Subject: +[^[:space:]]{60}/ REJECT no spaces > > > >Thanks mate. That works beautifully. One minor improvement. I > >think your quantifier there matches /exactly/ 60 non whitespaces. > > Yes, intentionally. Since the expression doesn't check for anything > after the {N} non-space characters, it doesn't matter what comes > after it. > > >I > >added a comma after it to specify at least instead. > > Unnecessary unless you're looking for additional matches after the > non-space characters. General rule of thumb is don't waste > resources trying to match things that don't matter.
Gotchya. THanks for the clarification. -- Troy Piggins