Noel Jones wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a way to exempt / prevent 471 (or other
temporary reject codes) from being cached?
The best solution is to not attempt to verify external senders.
Many sites will consider this abuse and blacklist you.
Thanks for your comment Noel. I wil
On 6/11/2015 5:49 AM, Mick wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> I have found 'reject_unverified_sender' superb at reducing the
> number of SPAM messages getting though. I've set up a whitelist for
> those few trusted senders or domains where their dopey mail servers'
> don't comply. I do have a minor pr
Good morning,
I have found 'reject_unverified_sender' superb at reducing the number of
SPAM messages getting though. I've set up a whitelist for those few
trusted senders or domains where their dopey mail servers' don't comply.
I do have a minor problem with mail servers that do comply, but