On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:39:53PM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Beating a dead horse, but I would use a relay where the admins do not know
> the standards. The admins of that server should delegate duties to someone
> else.
Perhaps the relay is really an MSA for home MUA users and is not desi
Trigve Siver wrote:
From: Michael Tokarev
To: Trigve Siver
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:08:04 AM
Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce
07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
[]
yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who a
On 2010-12-07 2:39 AM, Trigve Siver wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail
> server
> and sender is not existent, postfix generate bounce. Bounce has empty
> envelope
> "From" set (from=<>) . I'm using relayhost and when sending bounce back I've
Trigve Siver:
> Thanks for reply.
>
> Could some post the except from standard where this is defined to be able to
> argue with relayhost provider, please?
RFC 5321 is the current SMTP definition.
6.1. Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email
...
If there is a delivery failure after acce
* Trigve Siver :
> "... Since in most cases it is not appropriate to respond to an automatic
> response, and the responder is not interested in delivery status messages,
> a
> MAIL FROM address of <> MAY be used for this purpose. A MAIL FROM address
> which is specifically chosen for
> From: Ralf Hildebrandt
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:37:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce
>
> This is all best summed up by section 5.2.9 of RFC1123, which says:
>
> The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL
* Trigve Siver :
> Could some post the except from standard where this is defined to be able to
> argue with relayhost provider, please?
This is all best summed up by section 5.2.9 of RFC1123, which says:
The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits the case
of an empty path: "M
> From: Michael Tokarev
> To: Trigve Siver
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 10:08:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce
>
> 07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
> []
> > yes I know but I'm not in charge of re
07.12.2010 11:21, Trigve Siver wrote:
[]
> yes I know but I'm not in charge of realyhost and they (who are in charge)
> told
> me that they don't accept empty From. Could I somehow change From to some
> kind
> of "black hole" which will discard all the mails?
Postfix tries hard to conform to e
> From: Erwan David
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 9:05:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Empty From when generating bounce
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:24AM CET, Trigve Siver said:
> > Hi,
> > I'm having some problem with bounces.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:24AM CET, Trigve Siver said:
> Hi,
> I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail
> server
> and sender is not existent, postfix generate bounce. Bounce has empty
> envelope
> "From" set (from=<>) . I'm using relayhost and when sending b
Hi,
I'm having some problem with bounces. When someone send mail to my mail server
and sender is not existent, postfix generate bounce. Bounce has empty envelope
"From" set (from=<>) . I'm using relayhost and when sending bounce back I've
got
error that "From" shouldn't be empty/invalid (I thin
12 matches
Mail list logo
