On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> There are some milters that use spamc/spamd, and should work well
> with recent postfix versions. Google is your friend.
Thanks Noel... "milter" was the keyword I needed... google'd a lot,
but thought, postfix and spamassassin sites would be th
On 9/11/2013 9:53 AM, Johannes Jakob wrote:
>
> Nevertheless my question stays: is there a clean way to add
> spamassassin before-queue and keep the possibility to use spamd/spamc
> setup?
There are some milters that use spamc/spamd, and should work well
with recent postfix versions. Google is yo
>> Thanks for the quick response and sorry for not posting the complete
>> configuration, I thought the linked tutorial would be sufficient.
>
> You appear to believe that you implemented the cookbook recipe
> correctly. I think that is too optimistic. In my experience, people
> often don't see the
Johannes Jakob:
> Hello Wietse,
> Hi List,
>
> Thanks for the quick response and sorry for not posting the complete
> configuration, I thought the linked tutorial would be sufficient.
You appear to believe that you implemented the cookbook recipe
correctly. I think that is too optimistic. In my e
Hello Wietse,
Hi List,
Thanks for the quick response and sorry for not posting the complete
configuration, I thought the linked tutorial would be sufficient.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You created a mail filter loop. How to fix: please see the mailing
> list welcome
Johannes Jakob:
> Well, even this is working to a degree: incoming mail passes the
> spamchecks, is being tagged and handed over to postfix's sendmail,
> BUT: because of the situation with local mailbox AND forward, every
> mail gets _duplicated_!
>
> Can somebody please point out to me, how to fi
Greetings,
I'm nearly finished, setting up a postfix installation to coexist with
qmail based servers with plesk 7.5.4.
Let's assume us...@domaina.com wants to have his incoming mails:
- stored locally in a mailbox (maildir format) and
- forwarded to an other address
since all domains on this
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:21:54AM -0400, Justin McAleer wrote:
> >Another difference is that to the extent possible, failures to deliver
> >BCC copies do not generate bounces, so for archive/forensic/... copies,
> >BCC is often best.
>
> I've always had concerns over the bcc bounce situation. Ca
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:39:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Although there is some overlap of which method to use when,
generally one would use virtual_alias_maps to duplicate mail
for specified users, and recipient_bcc_maps to duplicate mail
for everyone in a specific
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:39:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Although there is some overlap of which method to use when,
> generally one would use virtual_alias_maps to duplicate mail
> for specified users, and recipient_bcc_maps to duplicate mail
> for everyone in a specific domain.
Another dif
Jie Wang wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
>
> I need to duplicate all the email messages for one destination server
> and send the copies to another destination. More specifically, I need
> to send all the original emails to destination1.com and send all the
> copies to destination2.com. Both destin
Personally, I'd use courier's maildrop and use a maildropex script to
duplicate the messages.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jie Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
>
> I need to duplicate all the email messages for one destination server and
> send the copies to another destina
Jie Wang wrote:
Hello, everyone,
I need to duplicate all the email messages for one destination server
and send the copies to another destination. More specifically, I need
to send all the original emails to destination1.com and send all the
copies to destination2.com. Both destination1.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
