On Fri, 17 May 2019 16:37:26 +0200
Christian Rößner wrote:
> a little bit hard to figure out your problem. I only can guess.
I was using 'dig txt chez-vrolet.net' and not turning up the correct
TXT records, and should have used 'dig txt
201905._domainkey.chez-vrolet.net' instead. Oops. =D
-De
Hi,
> Am 17.05.2019 um 07:28 schrieb Dennis Carr :
>
> Hey, guys. Might be a little bit off topic, but I'll throw it out
> there.
>
> I'm working to implent DKIM and DMARC at this time (DMARC is next), and
> I've got DKIM just about down except for one thing: the TXT record.
> Bind doesn't seem
On Thu, 16 May 2019 22:28:59 -0700
Dennis Carr wrote:
> I'm working to implent DKIM and DMARC at this time (DMARC is next),
> and I've got DKIM just about down except for one thing: the TXT
> record.
...and wouldn't you know it, it's because I was digging the wrong
domain name. Never mind.
-D
Hey, guys. Might be a little bit off topic, but I'll throw it out
there.
I'm working to implent DKIM and DMARC at this time (DMARC is next), and
I've got DKIM just about down except for one thing: the TXT record.
Bind doesn't seem to want to load the TXT record, despite that I've even
re-edited i
23. May 2016 11:11 by wie...@porcupine.org:
> Mail submitted this way will appear to come from IP address 127.0.0.1.
> If you don't have that address in the list of OpenDKIM's local
> networks, then it won't sign.
I do have that local host already in the opendkim configuration.
So I stopp
list...@tutanota.com:
> 23. May 2016 10:50 by wie...@porcupine.org:
>
> > To sign mail submitted with /usr/sbin/sendmail, you need to specify
> > non_smtpd_milters in main.cf.
> >
>
> Yes I understood that instruction.
>
> So now I have it in the main.cf and I verify it
>
> postconf non_smtpd_m
23. May 2016 10:50 by wie...@porcupine.org:
> To sign mail submitted with /usr/sbin/sendmail, you need to specify
> non_smtpd_milters in main.cf.
>
Yes I understood that instruction.
So now I have it in the main.cf and I verify it
postconf non_smtpd_milters
non_smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/o
list...@tutanota.com:
> In my logs I have only this
>
> May 22 09:07:28 mail postfix/pickup[26683]: 3rD3N05mHTz2xDs: uid=0
> from=
> May 22 09:07:28 mail postfix/cleanup[26971]: 3rD3N05mHTz2xDs:
> message-id=<3rd3n05mhtz2...@mail.example.com>
> May 22 09:07:28 mail postfi
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:29:33PM +0100, list...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I am testing dkim signing on my Postfix server. I am using the
> opendkim milter.
>
> For sending mail to other domains, external and not mine, the
> signing is working okay.
>
> But when I test it at the command line usin
I am testing dkim signing on my Postfix server. I am using the opendkim
milter.
For sending mail to other domains, external and not mine, the signing is
working okay.
But when I test it at the command line using 'sendmail' on the Postfix
server, where I am sending to my own domain
sendma
On 08 Jan 2015, at 15:02, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> On 08 Jan 2015, at 13:35, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
>
>> Our serve is redhat Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6 for 64-bit
>> x86_64), so stil redhat have postfix 2.6.6 ,
>>
>> i dont want to take this risk for updating running system. we have 6
On 08 Jan 2015, at 13:35, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
> Our serve is redhat Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6 for 64-bit x86_64),
> so stil redhat have postfix 2.6.6 ,
>
> i dont want to take this risk for updating running system. we have 60.000
> users and i'm just one people :)
Postfix tends to
Hi,
Our serve is redhat Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6 for 64-bit
x86_64), so stil redhat have postfix 2.6.6 ,
i dont want to take this risk for updating running system. we have 60.000
users and i'm just one people :)
They say milter_protocol number is 6 for postfix version >= 2.6 in som
Selcuk Yazar:
> Temporary MTA failure on relaying, From MTA() during fwd-connect (Negative
> greeting: at (eval 110) line 464, line 389171.)
Is this a program that talks to Postfix? In that case, look in
Postfix logs for what is causing the "Temporary MTA failure".
Wietse
On 01/08/2015 09:53 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> i try to implement dkim signature our server postfix (2.6.6)
>
> You should update Postfix to a recent version. Use opendkim instead of
> dkim-milter.
Assuming from your postfix version that you're running EL6 (RHEL6, o
* Selcuk Yazar :
> Hi,
>
> i try to implement dkim signature our server postfix (2.6.6)
You should update Postfix to a recent version. Use opendkim instead of
dkim-milter.
p@rick
>
> my dkim-filter config is like this
>
> prog path /usr/sbin/dkim-filter
> configurat
Hi,
i try to implement dkim signature our server postfix (2.6.6)
my dkim-filter config is like this
prog path /usr/sbin/dkim-filter
configuration parameters
# To sign only, use -bs
# EXTRA_FLAGS=-bs
USER=dkim-milter
PORT=inet:20209@localhost
SIGNING_DOMAIN="domain"
SELECTOR_NAME=&q
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Josef Karliak
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:50 AM
> To: Robert Schetterer
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: dkim-milter v
On 11/07/2011 05:15 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
2011/11/7 Robert Schetterer:
post your problem dkim-milter list
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=139420
FYI - that list doesn't exist any more. dkim-milter has been
deprecated in favor of OpenDKIM (http://opendkim.org/). It's a
2011/11/7 Robert Schetterer :
> post your problem dkim-milter list
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=139420
FYI - that list doesn't exist any more. dkim-milter has been
deprecated in favor of OpenDKIM (http://opendkim.org/). It's an
actively-supported milter project,
/JU5473lDWxr2tk7BzPco6N80LsjvmY3cN+4dChWhUxlnEaGVUm51PlgvU08
> =
>
> Thanks a lot
> J.K.
sorry no time to check that further
keep safe that nothing does change the header, after
dkim milter does ( i.e some x antivirus mail was added too etc)
verifieres sometimes need long to gi
ain)"
log messages. Entries in the file should be of the same form as those
of the PeerList option below.
The list is empty by default.
Cituji Robert Schetterer :
Am 07.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
>
>> Am 07.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
>>>> Good morning,
>>>> I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
>>>> 11.4 64-bit, generated keys (na
terer:
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
defined my options:
DKIM_MODES="sv"
DKIM_DOMAIN="ajetaci.cz"
nks
J.K.
Cituji Robert Schetterer :
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
defined my options:
DKIM_MODES="sv"
nks
J.K.
Cituji Robert Schetterer :
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
defined my options:
DKIM_MODES="sv"
Am 07.11.2011 10:46, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
>> Good morning,
>> I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
>> 11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
>&
Am 07.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Josef Karliak:
> Good morning,
> I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
> 11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config I
> defined my options:
> DKIM_MODES="sv"
> DKIM_DOM
Good morning,
I configured dkim-milter (2.7.2-x) to postfix (2.7.2-x) on opensuse
11.4 64-bit, generated keys (named "mail"). In the dkim-milter config
I defined my options:
DKIM_MODES="sv"
DKIM_DOMAIN="ajetaci.cz"
DKIM_SELECTOR="mail"
DKIM_CANON=&
Am 07.09.2011 17:57, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Kirill Bychkov:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Results:
>> 1. Test from http://www.elandsys.com/resources/mail/dkim/opendkim.html
>> DKIM Signature validation: pass (1024-bit key)
>> DKIM Author Domain Signing Practic
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> This means they broke it (assuming you aren't doing special
>> processing for Mail.RU etc. destinations).
>
> Agreed. I generally test by sending a message to my GMail account. If
> it
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> This means they broke it (assuming you aren't doing special
> processing for Mail.RU etc. destinations).
Agreed. I generally test by sending a message to my GMail account. If
it says "Signed by:" in the header details, I'm satisfied that I'm
Kirill Bychkov:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> Thank you!
>
> Results:
> 1. Test from http://www.elandsys.com/resources/mail/dkim/opendkim.html
> DKIM Signature validation: pass (1024-bit key)
> DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices: no DNS record for _adsp._
> domainkey.internetopr
Thank you!
Results:
1. Test from http://www.elandsys.com/resources/mail/dkim/opendkim.html
DKIM Signature validation: pass (1024-bit key)
DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices: no DNS record for _adsp._
domainkey.internetopros.ru
Authentication-Results: mx.elandsys.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> Someone has a server with DKIM check? Can I send a email there?
I like this one:
http://www.brandonchecketts.com/emailtest.php
and there are a few more listed in the "Testing Things Out" section of
this post:
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/
ith OpenDKIM -> Cloud of Mail
servers Mail.ru with DKIM checking.
Someone has a server with DKIM check? Can I send a email there?
Thanks!
On 7 September 2011 16:34, Wietse Venema wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 12:40, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > What happens on your mail processing chain
On 7 September 2011 12:40, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> What happens on your mail processing chain after the DKIM milter?
Kirill Bychkov:
> Mail goes direct to Internet without any relays.
What happens in the receiver's mail processing chain before
the receiver reports the problem:
eader:
> >
> > X-DKIM-FAIL: DKIM test failed: (address=x...@example.com
> > domain=example.com), signature is bad.
>
> What happens on your mail processing chain after the DKIM milter?
>
> p@rick
>
> --
> All technical questions asked privately will be automatic
t service
> port25.com are checked and DKIM signature successfully check (DKIM: pass)
> But some mail server write to header:
>
> X-DKIM-FAIL: DKIM test failed: (address=x...@example.com
> domain=example.com), signature is bad.
What happens on your mail processing chain after the DKIM mi
Hello,
I'm using OpenDKIM lilter for DKIM signature.
main.cf:
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:
And i'm using
always_add_missing_headers = yes
Test emails to many public mail servers (i.e. gmail) and test service
port25.com are checked and DKIM signature successfully check (DKIM: pass)
But so
Birta Levente a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
>
> In the main.cf:
>
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
>
> smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
> non_smtpd_milters = inet:localho
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 16:22 +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
> On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
> > From: Birta Levente
> > Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
> > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> >
> >
> >> My postfix server
Birta Levente:
> On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
> > From: Birta Levente
> > Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
> > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> >
> >
> >> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new
On 15/04/2010 18:26, Tomoyuki Murakami wrote:
From: Birta Levente
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters
From: Birta Levente
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
>
> In the main.cf:
>
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
>
> smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:2020
Hi all
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
milter_protocol = 2
milter_default_action = accept
With this configuration the
For those who missed it, the dkim-milter project forked.
Its principal developer is now with the OpenDKIM project.
The OpenDKIM v1.0.0 brings a couple of bug fixes over
the dkim-milter, and uses a new build mechanism.
Mark
Here is the announcement posted on 2009-08-14:
==
The OpenDKIM
47 matches
Mail list logo
