Re: DEAD THREAD (Was: ..::Spoofing Issues::..)

2010-10-07 Thread Noel Butler
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:37 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Noel Butler: > > > if you're in this list for some time, you probably know that spf > > > debates are taboo here. Please accept my apologies for my post (I > > > didn't realise that I was putting my foot in that old hole!). > > > > I doub

Re: DEAD THREAD (Was: ..::Spoofing Issues::..)

2010-10-07 Thread Wietse Venema
Noel Butler: > > if you're in this list for some time, you probably know that spf > > debates are taboo here. Please accept my apologies for my post (I > > didn't realise that I was putting my foot in that old hole!). > > I doubt July this year constitutes a long time , I was temp sub'd a > year

Re: DEAD THREAD (Was: ..::Spoofing Issues::..)

2010-10-07 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 00:24 +0200, mouss wrote: > Le 06/10/2010 00:37, Noel Butler a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, mouss wrote: > > > > > Le 04/10/2010 23:03, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : > > > > > > > Configure postfix to use SPF, and setup an SPF record in DNS for > > > > tha

DEAD THREAD (Was: ..::Spoofing Issues::..)

2010-10-07 Thread mouss
Le 06/10/2010 00:37, Noel Butler a écrit : On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 23:46 +0200, mouss wrote: Le 04/10/2010 23:03, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : Configure postfix to use SPF, and setup an SPF record in DNS for that domain. then what? you reject mail because of spf fail? that would lead to false p