Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-19 Thread E.B.
>> Thanks. So my understanding is correct that Postfix gets the hostnames you > see in the logs from PTR records? > > Yes. > >> You are saying that additionally, if the A record for the domain > doesn't match the client IP, the PTR will be ignored and thus you'll > still get "unknown"? >

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-19 Thread Kris Deugau
E.B. wrote: > Thanks. So my understanding is correct that Postfix gets the hostnames you > see in the logs from PTR records? Yes. > And that "connect from unknown[1.2.3.4]" is caused by a missing PTR (or DNS > issue)? A missing PTR is one cause. A DNS glitch that means the PTR lookup fails is

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-19 Thread E.B.
>>>   Hello, >>> >>>   My understanding was clients for whom you see this in the logs: >>> >>>   connect from unknown[1.2.3.4] >>> >>>   Do not have a PTR/rDNS set up for themselves. >> >> For Postfix to include the rDNS in the log and Received: header, the PTR >> name must then resolve back

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-19 Thread E.B.
> On Monday, November 18, 2013 7:57 AM, Kris Deugau wrote: > > E.B. wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> My understanding was clients for whom you see this in the logs: >> >> connect from unknown[1.2.3.4] >> >> Do not have a PTR/rDNS set up for themselves. > > For Postfix to include the rDNS in

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-18 Thread Kris Deugau
E.B. wrote: > Hello, > > My understanding was clients for whom you see this in the logs: > > connect from unknown[1.2.3.4] > > Do not have a PTR/rDNS set up for themselves. For Postfix to include the rDNS in the log and Received: header, the PTR name must then resolve back to that same IP as we

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:43:17AM -0800, E.B. wrote: > I did "dig -x 1.2.3.4" on the server for the same IP address and the result > came back with the correct domain name. So why didn't postfix see the host > name? I restarted postfix in case it was caching, but it didn't help. Show proof. Es

Re: Client host name resolution

2013-11-18 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 18.11.2013 12:43, schrieb E.B.: > My understanding was clients for whom you see this in the logs: > > connect from unknown[1.2.3.4] > > Do not have a PTR/rDNS set up for themselves. However, I recently tested a > connection (using telnet on the client side, connecting to port 25) from a >

Client host name resolution

2013-11-18 Thread E.B.
Hello, My understanding was clients for whom you see this in the logs: connect from unknown[1.2.3.4] Do not have a PTR/rDNS set up for themselves.  However, I recently tested a connection (using telnet on the client side, connecting to port 25) from a server that does have rDNS in place, but I