On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:25:33AM -0500, Brian Collins wrote:
> > So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> > postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> > centos 5
>
> Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine
> So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
> postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
> centos 5
Wietse does not release any RPM versions of Postfix. As you can imagine,
keeping that up for all the RPM-based distros would be quite a feat.
How
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
>>
>> So that seems to be it. I would really need to compile an "authentic"
>> postfix version. Can you give me a link to source RPM of 2.5.5 for
>> centos 5
>
> The authentic Postfix source code is released via
> http://www.postfix.org/
ram:
> > With all Postfix versions, the postmap command by default always
> > case folds CDB lookup keys, both on create and on query.
> >
> > If someone is distributing "improved" Postfix versions then you
> > need to file a complaint.
> >
>
> So that seems to be it. I would really need to comp
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> > >
> > > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
> > > > cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > > r.
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 08:25 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> > >
> > > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in
> > > > cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > > r..
ram:
>
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > > r...@netcore.co.in
> > > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:
ram wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>>
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>>> r...@netcore.co.in
>>> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/p
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:57 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> > r...@netcore.co.in
> > [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:58:07PM +0530, ram wrote:
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> r...@netcore.co.in
> [r...@50.133 postfix]# postmap -q t...@netcore.co.in cdb:/etc/postfix/vmap
> [r...@50.133 postfix]#
Well, that's not how CDB tables work here, l
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 06:48 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> ram:
> > if I use
> >virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> > This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
>
> Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
> Postfix logging.
>
> Wietse
I di
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:25:10PM +0530, ram wrote:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
"This doesn't work" is a very skimpy problem description.
> But if I use
> check_recipient_access cdb:/path/valid_recipient
ram:
> if I use
>virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
> This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
Please show evidence of this in the form of SMTP commands and
Postfix logging.
Wietse
if I use
virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/path/mapfile
This doesnt work if mails are sent to users in uppercase
But if I use
check_recipient_access cdb:/path/valid_recipients , that works fine
for uupercase as well as lowercase recipients
Is there any setting required to be done to enable uppe
14 matches
Mail list logo
