Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-14 Thread mouss
Kaleb Hosie a écrit : >> [snip] >> > > What we have done in our organization is started Using SpamAssassin > Quarantine. It runs SA as well as scans it for viruses. If it's detected as > possible spam, it holds it in quarantine. > I see (at least) two problems: - this forkes a perl program for e

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-14 Thread mouss
mouss a écrit : > Take a écrit : >> Hello! >> >> I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with >> virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our virtual >> configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the best way to drop spam. >> >> Our setup is postfix+cyrus-i

RE: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-14 Thread Kaleb Hosie
> Take a écrit : > > Hello! > > > > I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with > > virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our > > virtual configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the > best way to drop spam. > > > > Our setup is postfix+cyrus-imapd

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-14 Thread mouss
Take a écrit : > Hello! > > I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with > virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our virtual > configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the best way to drop spam. > > Our setup is postfix+cyrus-imapd+spamassassin. User

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Take wrote: > On 05/12/2010 06:55 PM, Dennis Guhl wrote: >> I don't know if cyrus can do something similar, but I think you want >> something like sieve_before in Dovecot: > > I wish it could, but it can't. I found this as well, but change to > dovecot isn't someth

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Take
On 05/12/2010 06:55 PM, Dennis Guhl wrote: > I don't know if cyrus can do something similar, but I think you want > something like sieve_before in Dovecot: I wish it could, but it can't. I found this as well, but change to dovecot isn't something we'd like to do. So this doesn't help either. Than

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Dennis Guhl
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:19:06PM +0300, Take wrote: > On 05/12/2010 11:39 AM, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote: > > I have a similar setup. What I do is using sieve. My script for mailbox > > > You have an extra advantage with this method: users may choose to edit > > his/her filter so he/she

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Take
On 05/12/2010 11:39 AM, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote: > I have a similar setup. What I do is using sieve. My script for mailbox > You have an extra advantage with this method: users may choose to edit > his/her filter so he/she could exactly decide whether he/she want junk mail > to be dropp

Re: Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez
Hello, I have a similar setup. What I do is using sieve. My script for mailbox creation also includes a small sieve filter setup, so every mailbox has its own filter. So Postfix setup (with spamassasin) adds X-Spam-* headers and the user decides based on that headers. You have an extra advantage

Best practice to drop spam with virtual mailboxes

2010-05-12 Thread Take
Hello! I've been trying to figure out the best way to drop/sort spam with virtual users. All documentation I could find didn't fit to our virtual configuration and I'm a bit confused what's the best way to drop spam. Our setup is postfix+cyrus-imapd+spamassassin. Users have access to sieve via ro