On 7/13/2011 6:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> SOHO or not: ip-addresses in PTR are mostly not real mailservers
The operative word here is "mostly". For instance, my outbound:
$ dig mx hardwarefreak.com
hardwarefreak.com. IN MX 10 greer.hardwarefreak.com.
greer.hardwarefreak.com
Am 14.07.2011 01:28, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 7/13/2011 3:08 PM, mouss wrote:
>> Le 13/07/2011 19:04, motty.cruz a écrit :
>
>>> Received: from ucmx01.uzuncase.com (66-193-162-90.static.twtelecom.net
>>> [66.193.162.90])
>
>> you might start with
>> /^(\d+\W){4}.*\.twtelecom\.net$/
>>
On 7/13/2011 3:08 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 13/07/2011 19:04, motty.cruz a écrit :
>> Received: from ucmx01.uzuncase.com (66-193-162-90.static.twtelecom.net
>> [66.193.162.90])
> you might start with
> /^(\d+\W){4}.*\.twtelecom\.net$/
> REJECT generic hostname. please use your ISP or fix
- Цитат от motty.cruz (motty.c...@gmail.com), на 13.07.2011 в 20:04 -
> Hi All, can anyone advise on how to effectively fight backscatter email.
> ...
> Any suggestions are welcome, thanks in Advance.
> -Motty
I have written a TCP table for signing outgoing mails using prv
Le 13/07/2011 19:04, motty.cruz a écrit :
> Hi All, can anyone advise on how to effectively fight backscatter email.
> Below a typical header of the tons of backscatter email users get a day
>
> Return-Path:
> X-Original-To: u...@domain.tld
> Delivered-To: u...@domain.tl
On 7/13/2011 12:04 PM, motty.cruz wrote:
> Hi All, can anyone advise on how to effectively fight backscatter email.
> Below a typical header of the tons of backscatter email users get a day
>
Start here:
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
Since you're using amavisd-ne
Hi All, can anyone advise on how to effectively fight backscatter email.
Below a typical header of the tons of backscatter email users get a day
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: u...@domain.tld
Delivered-To: u...@domain.tld
Received: from host.domain.tld (unknown [xxx.xxx.xxx.xx])
by
Matt Richards さんは書きました:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to check up on something ...
>
> I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to
> get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with
> forged from addresses.
>
> Today I still run my own mail server but
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:51:08AM +, Matt Richards wrote:
> Does anybody know what happened? Have servers just been
> reconfigured to not send backscatter from spam?
Here in the YMMV department ...
My little server hosts a few small Free Software community projects,
one of which is a small (
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Matt Richards:
Hello,
I just want to check up on something ...
I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to
get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with
forged from addresses.
Today I still run my own mail server b
Matt Richards:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to check up on something ...
>
> I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to
> get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with
> forged from addresses.
>
> Today I still run my own mail server but I don't s
Hello,
I just want to check up on something ...
I run my own mail servers, using postfix and a few years ago I use to
get quite a lot of backscatter due to spam messages being sent out with
forged from addresses.
Today I still run my own mail server but I don't see any of this
backscatter anymor
12 matches
Mail list logo