> According to sender verification logs for the last months on my
> small server, case folding the domain part would reduce the number
> of unique senders from 7436 to 7433 (0.04%), and case folding the
Here:
# postmap -s btree:verify | sort | uniq | wc -l
104785
# postmap -s btree:verify | awk '
Amedeo Rinaldo:
> Il 26/01/2012 13:15, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> > Do you have quantitative evidence, based on actual
> > email traffic, that this would make a difference?
>
>
> Hi Wietse, thanks for your reply ..i've taken some time to collect some
> data.
>
> I've monitored for 2 days one s
Il 26/01/2012 13:15, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Do you have quantitative evidence, based on actual
email traffic, that this would make a difference?
Wietse
Hi Wietse, thanks for your reply ..i've taken some time to collect some
data.
I've monitored for 2 days one single host wich han
bajo...@gmail.com:
> Il 26/01/2012 01:42, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
> > Daniel L. Miller:
> >> Can an alternative to "btree" be used for the verification database?
> >> Perhaps a SQL table?
> >
> > For persistent storage, the options are currently limited
> > to hash and btree. Postfix 2.9 adds mem
Il 26/01/2012 01:42, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Daniel L. Miller:
Can an alternative to "btree" be used for the verification database?
Perhaps a SQL table?
For persistent storage, the options are currently limited
to hash and btree. Postfix 2.9 adds memcache to this list.
Wietse
Sor
Daniel L. Miller:
> Can an alternative to "btree" be used for the verification database?
> Perhaps a SQL table?
For persistent storage, the options are currently limited
to hash and btree. Postfix 2.9 adds memcache to this list.
Wietse
Can an alternative to "btree" be used for the verification database?
Perhaps a SQL table?
--
Daniel
