MX records only apply to the destination FQDN for the email. Spoofing
the destined domain to force everything through the relays is not a good
idea.
Most load balancing of an outbound relay requires you to force or
manually configure the relay in your mail programs, to point to the load
balan
Hi List,
thank you for confirming my opinions about DNS for load balancing. I share
your opinions.
@Peer - your advice is to use MX records. I don't think, MX-records can be used
for relayservers.
Our flow is:
Client -> Exchange - > Relayserver -> t...@example.com
I only see a use case fo
Wietse:
> Yes, if the sender is Postfix. Postfix will randomly select from
> equal-preference IP addresses and IP protocols. This is intentional,
> so that mail does not get stuck when one path is broken.
See also my second response with pointers to relevant Postfix
configuration parameters that c
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Im Auftrag von Wietse Venema
Yes, if the sender is Postfix. Postfix will randomly select from
equal-preference IP addresses and IP protocols. This is intentional, so that
mail does not
