Hi List, thank you for confirming my opinions about DNS for load balancing. I share your opinions.
@Peer - your advice is to use MX records. I don't think, MX-records can be used for relayservers. Our flow is: Client -> Exchange - > Relayserver -> t...@example.com I only see a use case for using MX-records the other way around: t...@example.com -> Mailserver -> Exchange -> Client In the latter case, I can balance with MX records to different Relayservers. Not from inside to outside when a relayserver is used -correct? Stefan
