On Dec 24, 2014, at 1:42 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:44:12AM -0800, steve zeng wrote:
>> Yes. It is redhat 5
>>
>>> who wrote that client and why?
>>
>> It is a legacy application written years ago by dev team. I will try upgrade
>> postfix either on RHEL6 to levera
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:44:12AM -0800, steve zeng wrote:
> Yes. It is redhat 5
>
> >who wrote that client and why?
>
> It is a legacy application written years ago by dev team. I will try upgrade
> postfix either on RHEL6 to leverage command_filter as suggested by Mr.
> Venema. The last opti
eve
-Original essage-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of li...@rhsoft.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 5:42 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: 5.5.4 Unsupported option:
Am 24.12.2014 um 02:32 schrieb steve zeng:
>
steve zeng:
> Is there a postfix config to simply disable the syntax check on
> MAIL FROM field?
In Postfix 2.7 and later.
Your client syntax violates SMTP syntax (which was defined in 1982!!!)
MAIL FROM: some non-standard crap
I recommend that you remove the non-standard crap from the cli
master email, I got:
Out: 220 qa.mycompany.com ESMTP Postfix
In: HELO app01.mycompany.com
Out: 250 postfix.mycompany.com
In: MAIL FROM: Customer Support
Out: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: Customer
It looks like the command filter did not kick in. when looked at its
document, it appears ava
:
Out: 220 qa.mycompany.com ESMTP Postfix
In: HELO app01.mycompany.com
Out: 250 postfix.mycompany.com
In: MAIL FROM: Customer Support
Out: 555 5.5.4 Unsupported option: Customer
It looks like the command filter did not kick in. when looked at its
document, it appears available from postfi
Hi!
On 2014-12-22 7:06 PM, steve zeng wrote:
Greetings!
We switched from Exim 4.6.3 to postfix 2.3.3 as mail relay host on RHEL 5.
We start getting report that email are rejected. We did a telnet emulation
and found that postfix reject email header as below:
MAIL FROM: "My Company Support"
Correction: the pattern posted was not the pattern tested.
> steve zeng:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > We switched from Exim 4.6.3 to postfix 2.3.3 as mail relay host on RHEL 5.
> > We start getting report that email are rejected. We did a telnet emulation
> > and found that postfix reject email header
Wietse Venema:
> steve zeng:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > We switched from Exim 4.6.3 to postfix 2.3.3 as mail relay host on RHEL 5.
> > We start getting report that email are rejected. We did a telnet emulation
> > and found that postfix reject email header as below:
> >
> > MAIL FROM: "My Company Sup
steve zeng:
> Greetings!
>
> We switched from Exim 4.6.3 to postfix 2.3.3 as mail relay host on RHEL 5.
> We start getting report that email are rejected. We did a telnet emulation
> and found that postfix reject email header as below:
>
> MAIL FROM: "My Company Support"
That is not valid synta
Greetings!
We switched from Exim 4.6.3 to postfix 2.3.3 as mail relay host on RHEL 5.
We start getting report that email are rejected. We did a telnet emulation
and found that postfix reject email header as below:
MAIL FROM: "My Company Support"
If I simply change it to:
MAIL FROM: "My Company
Jeroen Geilman skrev den 2013-01-14 23:42:
That said, postfix contains no SPF functionality.
You'll have to consult the documentation for whatever you are using
to deal with SPF.
spf is not a recipient problem on the software used to verify that
sender domain did a good job of reading rfc spe
Jaap van Wingerde skrev den 2013-01-14 22:55:
"['Permerror', 'SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups',
FROM: SIZE=5696 AUTH=<>":
"555
5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH=<>"
http://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/microsoft.com
contact postmasters
Jaap van Wingerde:
> Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1954]: warning: proxy
> 127.0.0.1:10025 rejected "MAIL
> FROM: SIZE=5696 AUTH=<>": "555
> 5.5.4 Unsupported option: AUTH=<>"
Easy fix: don't announce AUTH support on the MX service por
On 01/14/2013 10:55 PM, Jaap van Wingerde wrote:
Is microsoft.com and versatel.nl sending mail with invalid AUTH?
What means: "SPF Permanent Error: Too many DNS lookups'"?
"Permanent Error" seems fairly self-explanatory to me.
That said, postfix contains no SPF functionality.
You'll have to co
18 20:12:34 gaugino dkimproxy.in[16897]: connect from 127.0.0.1
Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1957]: initializing the
server-side TLS engine
Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1957]: connect from
localhost[127.0.0.1]
Dec 18 20:12:34 gaugino postfix/smtpd[1954]: warning: proxy
127.0.0.1:10
16 matches
Mail list logo
