On 4 Jan 2010, at 19:23, richard lucassen wrote:
> Thnx to everyone. I think mailman and mlmmj are good suggestions. I'll
> examine all of these and I'll choose the one that fits best to this
> rather particular purpose.
Mailman is a python app, mlmmj is a native C app that works through a loca
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +
Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
> > I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to
> > setup and run.
>
>
> I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web
> interface like mailman and works great with Postfix.
Thnx to everyone. I think
On 4 Jan 2010, at 14:53, Jerry wrote:
> Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl
> and has a web interface for most common configuration settings.
> Obviously, it can be configured manually. In fact, some settings are
> not exposed in the web interface. Plus, it works
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:01:00 +
Gaby Vanhegan replied:
>I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web
>interface like mailman and works great with Postfix.
Personally, I have used DADA Mail in the past. It is written in Perl
and has a web interface for most common configurat
On 4 Jan 2010, at 13:43, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to
> setup and run.
I'd suggest mlmmj, it works like ezmlm but doesn't require a web interface like
mailman and works great with Postfix.
Gaby.
--
Expounding the theory of infinit
> richard lucassen :
> This is for a blind person who handles the
> "mailinglist" himself, so solutions are rather limited.
Installing a MLM is quite easy although on a Windows Family box.
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developp
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:00:32PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> [mlm]
>
> > I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> > option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
> > reputati
* richard lucassen :
> Hello list,
>
> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
> can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
> higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Use an MLM
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Gesc
On Jan 3, 2010, at 13:14, richard lucassen
wrote:
but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO
An mlm is certainly not overkill for 3,000 recipients.
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 20:37 +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
> can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
> higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this
* Glenn English :
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:14 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
>
> >> 3000 recipients is waaay too many to do in a single
> >> shot using Bcc.
> >
> > Ok, but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO, just wondering if there was
> > an inte
On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:14 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
>> 3000 recipients is waaay too many to do in a single
>> shot using Bcc.
>
> Ok, but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO, just wondering if there was
> an intermediate solution. This is for a blind person who handl
--
From: "Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz"
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 4:13 PM
To:
Subject: Re: 3000 recipients
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a r
* richard lucassen :
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> [mlm]
>
> > I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> > option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
> > reputation when there is a delivery problem. For exam
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
> I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
> reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
> the aliases option,
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:23:50PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
> richard lucassen wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
>> Mark Goodge wrote:
>>>> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
>>>> recipien
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:14:03PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
> Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> > > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > > smtpd
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
Mark Goodge wrote:
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
better way to handle this?
Yes. Install
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
Mark Goodge wrote:
> > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
> > better way to handle this?
&g
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:50:21 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * richard lucassen :
> > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
>
richard lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Yes. Install a proper mailing list management system, such
* richard lucassen :
> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
> can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
> higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Chosse a client/write a script that breaks the list of 3.000 r
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
R.
--
___
It is
25 matches
Mail list logo
