, 2011 at 09:26:09PM +0800, 张耀星 wrote:
Please don't top-post.
Am 23.05.2011 14:39, schrieb yaoxing:
May 23 07:27:36 gw1 postfix/local[7700]: fatal: main.cf configuration error:
mailbox_size_limit is smaller than
message_size_limit
And I haven't change anything f
Hi all,
I have a mail server which has been running for more than 1 year without
any problem. recently (from last Sat. exactly) some user from our
website reports that he can't get his subscription email. So I checked
the server, and find that the active queue is full, with more than 280M
disk
a
3rd party company. It's also the reason why we want to manage the list
ourselves. Handing such a list to a 3rd party ESP is always a potential
risk.
So far thank you for all your messages and merry christmas!
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/25 5:48, Stan Hoeppner Wrote:
Yaoxing put forth on 12/24
does
not work with Linux logs easily. It would be great if there's a way for
postfix to output such a list directly, so that other programs just read
it directly.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 23:26, Wietse Venema Wrote:
Postfix returns undeliverable mail to the envelope sender address.
P
Thanks for the suggestions. Some comments below.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 9:17, Victor Duchovni Wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 09:11:19AM +0800, ? wrote:
- Make sure your lists really contain users who want to receive the
newsletter, not just users whose email address you
ybe a windows console program, then delete them from our
subscription database. But where can I get the list firstly? dead mails
seems to have been deleted directly.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 20:21, Ralf Hildebrandt Wrote:
* Victor Duchovni:
- Remove non-working addresses promptly from
ons to adjust our servers.
And for Stan, sorry to have made you misunderstand. Again, your figure
150 tps disk IO helps to decide the image server should be removed from
the mail server host.
Merry Christmas & Happy new year to all of you!
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 3:11, Victor Duchovni Wr
Well I don't want to make this thread look an advertisement. but as long
as you found out already, try Alexa to get more about dealextreme.com
which would prove to you we are not spammers.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 3:05, Wietse Venema Wrote:
Yaoxing:
I was getting suspicious because
ewsletters to our
subscribed clients weekly. we have nothing to do with spammers.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 2:43, Stan Hoeppner Wrote:
Yaoxing put forth on 12/23/2010 12:05 PM:
After doing some checking, it appears you are blasting out porn spam on
behalf of xxx.com whose domain registration
7;s wrong. also
the same server serves some images. So if it's because of the image
server which takes most of the disk IO, I'll just remove the image
server to another host.
And about the filter, at the very beginning I don't know it causes so
many troubles. that's what green
, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK
1293126009 g6si24321991anh.62)
Dec 23 11:40:09 e postfix/qmgr[29972]: 28E6A29EA884: removed
Dec 23 11:40:09 e postfix/qmgr[29972]: AAF1E29E90FC:
from=, size=44507, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
2010/12/24 1:37, Victor Duchovni Wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01
arting. So maybe those mails acts new mails?
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/24 1:29, Victor Duchovni Wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:17:48AM +0800, Yaoxing wrote:
It's a newsletter group. because it's congesting so I stopped posting new
mails. I think that's why all mails are from 12
see comments below.
2010/12/24 1:16, Victor Duchovni Wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:07:58AM +0800, Yaoxing wrote:
Waste of time. Post NON-VERBOSE LOGGING by smtp(8) and qmgr(8).
logfiles=/some/where
egrep 'postfix/(qmgr|smtp)\[' $logfiles | tail -100
Dec 23
It's a newsletter group. because it's congesting so I stopped posting
new mails. I think that's why all mails are from 1280+ min ago.
I use
find active/ | wc -l
which gives me 20,002, while
find incoming/ | wc -l
gives 130,000+
and the incoming queue is slowly decreasing.
R
I think the bandwidths is OK. I have a 100Mb ethernet but until now it's
like15Mb/s according to
iftop -i eth1
For the concurrency issue, what parameter would you suggest to change? I
found some parameters from the documents but do not fully understand
them yet.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/
f
virtual_mailbox_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_minimum_uid = 500
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:500
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/23 23:13, Stan Hoeppner Wrote:
Wietse Venema put forth on 12/23/2010 6:10 AM:
4. Less than 20 postfix process (while limitation is
No special reasons, just trying to find a simple way to program. If this is
the reason why it's so slow, how about using smtp instead? does it resolve
the problem?
On Dec 23, 2010 8:11 PM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
1 0 3
00 0
bellsouth.net4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
10 0
gmx.de3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
00 0
ono.com3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
00 0
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/
still don't go out.
What do you think?
I checked the directories, it's the incoming directory which is very
big. if I use
find incomfing/ | wc -l
it tells me there are likely 130,000 mails in this directory.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/23 18:03, Ramprasad Wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 1
Hi Stan,
Thank you very much for your adequate explanation. I made some comments
below.
Regards,
Yaoxing
2010/12/23 16:06, Stan Hoeppner:
> Yaoxing put forth on 12/22/2010 9:59 PM:
>
>> 3. 3.2MB/s disk IO write, 0.01MB/s read.
> MB/s throughput isn't usually a factor, but IO
s anything?). Can anybody
provide some more information on locating the problem?
Any help is appreciated.
--
Regards,
Yaoxing
21 matches
Mail list logo
