Re: postscreen whitelist

ael. I've backed off on sorbs and junkemailfilters. Maybe that will be enough. Thank you for the info on postwhite Steve. -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost Carlsbad, CA http://www.dop.com 800/464-6434

postscreen whitelist

, -Terry $ postconf -n body_checks = pcre:/opt/local/etc/postfix/body_checks broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes command_directory = /opt/local/sbin compatibility_level = 2 daemon_directory = /opt/local/libexec/postfix data_directory = /opt/local/var/lib/postfix debugger_command = PATH=/opt/local/bin:/bin

Re: pfctl on MacOSX

ult. > > anyway, it’s running now, and I’ll try a reboot later to see if it ‘enables’ > - I may have to time it so it enables after the pfctl loads the conf. > > cheers Robert, I find IceFloor to be a helpful frontend for pf. <http://www.hanynet.com/icefloor/index.html&

body_checks syntax for multi line?

I'm trying to be a little more specific in a body_check to reject certain spoofed spam. I have it currently working when searching for just a single line but would like to learn how to expand the search to multiple lines. The spam looks like (modified to prevent being rejected by the body_checks

Fw: important message

Hey friend! Check this out http://bigobjectbase.com/so.php?1a te...@dop.com

Re: Block mail servers with no reverse dns entries

> This is more a matter of policy than law. I prefer to turn some > additional tests when check_client_access matches "unknown". > > Wietse Can you show your additional tests? let me add my thanks to you Wietse for such great software. -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

postfix stats

I've been using pflogsumm but it's old and doesn't know about postscreen. I'd like to see how many connections are being refused by postscreen. What do you like? logwatch? awstats? other? Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

Re: Stan Hoeppner's fqrdns.pcre file?

teveJ github URL for curl: $ curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre/master/fqrdns.pcre Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

Re: spam fighting

03 TCP - Razor2 service, out > 24441 UDP - Pyzor service. Do most who use postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin also use shared services like pyzor? > I heard many saying that Spamassassin is weak, while they don't understand > how it works. > > Bottom line, a machine wi

Re: spam fighting

> On Apr 28, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Marius Gologan wrote: > > Hi Terry, > > I use amavisd-new/spamassassin in post-queue configuration with few > adjustments: increased score for SPF_FAIL, DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD, Bayes_80, > Bayes_95, Bayes_99, Bayes_999 and few others. > Local D

spam fighting

ix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf virtual_minimum_uid = _vmail virtual_transport = dovecot virtual_uid_maps = static:_vmail Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

Re: Compile errors on Mac: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_FIPS_md_ctx_create"

;s not much of an issue. In any case you need > to choose a package management system (homebrew, macports, pkgsrc, > ...) and use it consistently. You're having too much trouble > doing the integration from the ground up. > > -- > Viktor. +1 macports -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

RE: No one has responded to either of my posts

>From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] >On Behalf Of bperrotta >Sent: Friday, 21 March 2014 11:22 AM >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Subject: No one has responded to either of my posts > >I found the answer to my problem. >Postfix wont mount if you have a b

RE: I have screwed it up

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 12:48 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: I have screwed it up OK, so I changed the main.cf: Changed

RE: I have screwed it up

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 11:39 AM To: postfix users Subject: Re: I have screwed it up Noel & Terry, That was mu first thought as

RE: I have screwed it up

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 11:25 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: I have screwed it up Hi all, I've been using postfix with a sma

Re: Outlook 2010 554 5.7.1 reject

To close this thread, it's working fine after telling the user to enable the checkbox in the Outgoing Server config that says, "My server requires authentication." Thanks again. -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

Re: OOS success or coincidence?

On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:42 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 1/29/2014 2:45 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: >> Last night our mailserver networking seemed to die. This has happened >> approximately 3 times over the last year but I haven't been able to find >> what triggers it. In

OOS success or coincidence?

ysql_virtual_mailbox_domains.cf virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/opt/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf virtual_minimum_uid = _vmail virtual_transport = dovecot virtual_uid_maps = static:_vmail Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

Re: Outlook 2010 554 5.7.1 reject

On Jan 28, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 1/28/2014 12:55 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: >> First off, thank you Wietse for postfix. It's really amazing software and I >> appreciate the hard work and dedication by you and others here that make it >> so great.

Outlook 2010 554 5.7.1 reject

mysql:/opt/local/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf virtual_minimum_uid = _vmail virtual_transport = dovecot virtual_uid_maps = static:_vmail Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost http://www.dop.com

RE: Re-inventing TCP (was: newbie check..)

newbie check..) Terry Gilsenan: > I have done testing with file transfers using both TCP and UDP, Would not the same result be achieved by disabling TCP congestion control? I am not implying that doing so is a good idea. Wietse ===[Disclaimer]=== This electronic transmission, including

RE: Re-inventing TCP (was: newbie check..)

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sander Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 3:47 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Re-inventing TCP (was: newbie check..) >Am 30.08.2013 19:36, schrieb Te

RE: Re-inventing TCP (was: newbie check..)

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 2:56 AM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Re-inventing TCP (was: newbie check..) >Terry Gilsenan: >> I have done testing

RE: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]

, at 7:07 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote: >> As attachments get larger, and end users use email rather than ftp for file >> transfer for convenience sake, a UDP implementation, perhaps using UDP as a >> data >>streaming channel could become a very useful configuration, and the

RE: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]

, at 7:07 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote: >> As attachments get larger, and end users use email rather than ftp for file >> transfer for convenience sake, a UDP implementation, perhaps using UDP as a >> data >streaming channel could become a very useful configuration, and the &

RE: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Jan P. Kessler Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2013 12:21 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check] >> As attachme

RE: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]

] On 08/30/2013 08:53 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote: > There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe > reserved for future use? No, it's just the assignment from IANA. In the past when either a TCP or UDP port assignment was requested both were assigned, this does not mean

RE: newbie check Was [Re: port 25 submission settings sanity check]

There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe reserved for future use? t From: Glenn English Sent: ‎29/‎08/‎2013 3:44 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: por

RE: quiet or broken

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema > Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 10:28 AM > To: Postfix users > Subject: quiet or broken > > Either it has become very quiet here, or something has broken. > >

RE: Recommendations for antivirus

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of TFML > Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013 7:55 AM > To: Postfix users > Subject: Recommendations for antivirus > > I'm running a server on average week we receive 14,000, send

RE: Relay through multiple addresses without DNS

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Andy Brody > Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:33 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Relay through multiple addresses without DNS > > Hi Postfix users, > > I'

Re: [SPAM] Re: The ultimate email server

deliver } -> default:quarantine http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=dspam/dspam;a=blob_plain;f=README;hb=HEAD -Terry

postscreen settings

In the last several months I've been seeing more spam make it through. I just counted 12 in the last hour, mostly of the credit-alert and weight loss variety. I setup postscreen awhile back so I'm wondering what dnsbl sites and weighting others are using. $ postconf -n broken_sasl_auth_clients

Re: [SPAM] postgrey vs postscreen

not done any empirical testing here but my impression is that it works at least as well as postgrey. I like that it's seamlessly integrated into postfix. -Terry

RE: spam tags

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of K bharathan [kbhara...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 20 April 2012 6:47 AM To: postfix users list Subject: spam tags hi all am getting spams with ***Spam*** tags in the subject line; esp lottery spams; anybody know

RE: Implementation of compression technology

> >From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On >Behalf Of Ashok Kumar J [ashok.jagathe...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 5:55 PM >To: postfix-users@postfix.org >Subject: Re: Implementation of compression technology >

Re: Postfix on Virtual Guest Cannot send mail

Please forgive the top posting, this is difficult with a blackberry. The log snippit shows..: fileserver.test.org192.168.1.31]:25 You you have a transport file or relayhost setting? It might have a problem with a typo I can see a closing square bracket, but not an opening square bracket. Reg

RE: Mail.Global.FrontBridge.com

___ From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Arnim Sommer [rantho...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, 26 November 2010 11:11 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Mail.Global.FrontBridge.com >Hello, >unfortunately, @

RE: Sample php scripts to emulate POP3

o emulate this without using POP3/IMAP On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Terry Gilsenan mailto:terry.gilse...@interoil.com>> wrote: google for fetchmail it is designed for this purpose. From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org<mailto:owner-postfix-us...@po

RE: Sample php scripts to emulate POP3

google for fetchmail it is designed for this purpose. From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of sunhux G [sun...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 4:55 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Sample php script

RE: Fighting Backscatter

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Steve Jenkins [st...@stevejenkins.com] Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 11:50 AM To: Terry Gilsenan; Postfix users Subject: RE: Fighting Backscatter >Hi, Terry. Again, very helpful advice presented in a wa

RE: Fighting Backscatter

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Steve Jenkins [st...@stevejenkins.com] Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 10:52 AM To: Postfix users Subject: RE: Fighting Backscatter >I will gladly solve the RIGHT problem. The fact that I'm here looking for >gui

RE: ..::Spoofing Issues::..

Configure postfix to use SPF, and setup an SPF record in DNS for that domain. sent from my Telstra NEXTG™ handset From: Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez Sent: Tuesday, 5 October 2010 5:38 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: ..::Spoofing Issues::.. Hi, eve

RE: Postfix, POP/IMAP server, virtual users, web administration - what do you use?

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss [mo...@ml.netoyen.net] Sent: Tuesday, 28 September 2010 8:15 AM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Postfix, POP/IMAP server, virtual users, web administration - what do you use? Le 27/09/2010 13:25, Julien V

Re: Funny headers_checks matching

ried running in debug mode but couldn't get any insight to it.. I'm running postfix-2.7.1 on solaris10.. Post your header_checks file. There's probably something wrong with it. Terry

Re: Limit RCPT TO in Postfix

l users You can use fail2ban to add a firewall DROP rule for any IPs that guess too many (configurable) bad email addresses. Terry

RE: Local delivery not working properly

>mynetworks is open because the filter will be done on the firewall, >and the firewall ppl request me not to block the network. You need to fix the problem with accepting the entire internet into your trusted networks. Having 0.0.0.0/0 in mynetworks is not smart, and if technical people are te

Re: OT: ldap schema

tp://phamm.org/ kind regards, Terry

upgrade from 2.6.2 to 2.7.1

nimum_uid = 102 virtual_transport = dovecot virtual_uid_maps = static:102 Thanks, -Terry

RE: Local delivery rejected

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGougan [paul.mcgou...@braintree.com.au] Sent: Friday, 4 June 2010 12:42 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Local delivery rejected On 4/06/2010 12:37 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > A better solutio

Re: SSL Certificates per domain

On 06/01/2010 10:00 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:20:56AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > >>> Common Name: myserver.domain.com >>> MX for domain1: smtp.domain1.com >>> MX for domain2: smtp.domain2.com >>> >>> Then, how i configure SSL Certificates per domain on Postfix? >>>

Re: stumped: postfix silently won't start

at starts with "May 20 14:39:01 postfix/master..." and that >> explains why it terminates. > > = > > found it: > > /var/log/console.log:May 20 14:39:01 s...@sl1.hctc.net postfix/master[18366]: > fatal: unable to set session and process group ID: Operation not permitted > > Len So for postfix newbies like myself, what caused this problem and were you able you fix it? Thanks, -Terry

RE: Stopping spammers extreme

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Appliantologist [octo...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2010 9:11 AM To: Gary Smith Cc: The Doctor; postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Stopping spammers extreme Hi, We don't have any legitimate users sendin

RE: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fakessh [fake...@fakessh.eu] Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 7:43 AM To: Egberto Monteiro Cc: Postfix users Subject: Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto M

TLS library problem

iday night.) -Terry

Re: lots of lost connections

On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:05 PM, brian moore wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:13:27 -0700 > Terry Barnum wrote: > >> Other ideas why those clients didn't get rejected before DATA? > > ESMTP Pipelining? > > They could very well be rejected before DATA, except, well,

Re: lots of lost connections

On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Terry Barnum wrote: > >>>> $ grep 'lost connection' /var/log/mail.log >>>> >>>> Mar 30 05:07:14 mail postfix/smtpd[45236]: lost connection after DATA from >>>&g

Re: lots of lost connections

On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 3/30/2010 2:46 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: >> I moved our company over to postfix (v2.6.2) last Friday and have been >> mesmerized by the log. One thing I'm seeing is a lot

Re: lots of lost connections

On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 3/30/2010 2:46 PM, Terry Barnum wrote: >> I moved our company over to postfix (v2.6.2) last Friday and have been >> mesmerized by the log. One thing I'm seeing is a lot of 'lost connections >> from unknown[ I

lots of lost connections

x_maps.cf virtual_minimum_uid = 102 virtual_transport = dovecot virtual_uid_maps = static:102 -Terry

machine.local question

l_uid_maps = static:102 Thanks, -Terry

RE: reject forged emails

Sent from my HTC -Original Message- From: Frank Bonnet Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 6:22 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: reject forged emails Hello Is there a possibility to reject that kind of forged email I have one domain, say domain.com and I want to reject emails tha

RE: Relaying and backskatter problem

duyz 仍然们 ent from my HTC -Original Message噢 From: Wietse Venema 万维网 Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 6:29 AM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Relaying and backskatter problem Sean Reifschneider: > On 03/24/2010 10:36 AM, Randy wrote: > > EX: > > : Sender address rejected: Domain not found (in > >

Re: migration question

On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Adrian Overbury wrote: > Terry Barnum wrote: > > > > - configure new postfix/dovecot server to be in correct domain (conf files, > > certificates) > > - setup users and passwords on new postfix/dovecot server > > - use imapsync to

migration question

smtp on the old server - use imapsync again to pull any new email from old server to new postfix server - turn off old server Is this a reasonable approach? Thanks, -Terry Terry Barnum digital OutPost San Diego, CA http://www.dop.com 800/464-6434

Re: load balancing among mail servers

ered to check MX records isn't anybody's problem except the sender. In fact, just like spambots, broken clients that send to the wrong MX tend to end up on RBLs fairly quickly, making them even less of a problem. Terry

Re: how to deny incoming mail from specific domain

"postconf -n |grep sender_access" turns up something. In any case, I'm not sure that refusing to talk to a single hotmail server will accomplish anything useful. What are you trying to do? Terry

Re: Unknown Users

primary mx is down, the backup mx might not have anything to query. You might want to have the primary mx export a list of valid users periodically as a text file, then have the backup server pick it up with rsync, then postfix can use it to validate recipients. Terry

Re: relayhost - what smtp server can I use?

of mail to AOL or a few users click the "SPAM" button, suddenly you won't be able to send any mail to AOL, and getting this fixed takes work, which you may or may not want to do. Terry

Re: Accepted undeliverable mail

lways welcomed, but not always accepted. I'll pass on updating the docs. Considering that I misinterpreted them, I'm probably not the right person to submit a change. Thanks again. Terry

Re: Accepted undeliverable mail

elp, but I'm either misunderstanding the docs or something is behaving improperly. Terry

Re: Accepted undeliverable mail

rejected at the rcpt to: command, while badu...@whatever.cnysupport.com is accepted, then causes an NDR. Anybody have any ideas? I have no valid subdomains, so simply rejecting anything sent to one would be just fine. Thanks, Terry postconf -n: alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases command_direct

Accepted undeliverable mail

f course itself undeliverable, since it's in response to spam. Anybody have any idea how this is happening? Thanks, Terry local_recipient_maps = unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases There is no user or alias named "squirrel". Feb 2 06:54:05 wormhol

Re: Whitelist: ~user/.postfix_whitelist; chmod 600 .postfix_whitelist?

pt parse it, and block users that send too much spammy-looking mail, until they've been reviewed by an admin. Terry

[OT] Re: suitable webmail

o the application directory without a valid login. The http auth box is ugly and somewhat annoying, however there's a lot to be set for a very stable, low-level, simple authentication mechanism. Terry

Re: Linux users with mixed case names

rosalie" to refer to two distinct users, or are you just considering this as a display problem? Terry Thanks, I discovered this and I personally consider this a bug. In these days, users names need to be mixed case for security reasons. If I have a domain name I could just run thr

Re: Linux users with mixed case names

are you just considering this as a display problem? Terry

Re: Spam Attack on my outgoing server

#x27;t feel bad. It's almost never a postfix issue. Terry

Re: possible problem with postfix/local??

are as follows: Is the alias table generated dynamically? It is possible that it's not readable (still being written) at the time the lookup happens? Terry

Bypass some header_checks rules for a specific user?

line at a time. Any suggestions? Thanks, Terry

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

er: http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_PROXY_README.html, it may become a performance problem and it probably not an optimal solution. Aside from anything else, it will really annoy the senders if the mail is legitimate. Terry

Re: Two MX servers with load balancing

/transport otherdomain.com smtp: Terry

Re: Filtering e-mail headers : To,Cc and Bcc

ant for message delivery. The recipient information is envelope information, which is transmitted during the SMTP protocol. If you really want to only allow single recipient messages, I'd suggest writing a custom plugin for a mail filter like amavis. Terry -- Terry Carmen CNY Support, LLC http://cnysupport.com

Re: smtp_enforce_tls on submission tcp/587 only

Terry L. Inzauro wrote: > I am trying to force submission (with SMTP auth via SASL) clients on tcp/587 > to use TLS. Is there anyway to do this? I ran > across smtp_enforce_tls, but this seems to force any and all SMTP clients to > use TLS which is not what I want (this is a >

smtp_enforce_tls on submission tcp/587 only

ail message submission /etc/postfix/tls_policy: [example.net]:587 encrypt protocols=TLSv1 ciphers=high [example.net]:msa encrypt protocols=TLSv1 ciphers=high [example.net]:submission encrypt protocols=TLSv1 ciphers=high http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html> kind regards, Terry

Re: What Is Causing This Failure

Frog wrote: > Perhaps your mail server is on a DNSBL? > > Regards > Frog > > > - Original Message - > From: "Carlos Williams" > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Tuesday, 1 December, 2009 4:05:25 PM > Subject: Re: What Is Causing This Failure > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Ra

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro

John wrote: > Sorry to bring this here, but we are having trouble setting up a > Postfix/dovecot mail system. > > Background: > We are a bunch of retirees, so cost is a factor in any decision. We all > have IT experience, some of going back decades, however the world of > Linux and its software is

Re: OT: need some advice as to distro

It sets up an additional repository that uses much more up-to-date apps than are in the Centos repository. Another option would be to install from source, which is actually not difficult at all, and is very similar to what you probably did 20 years ago, only easier. (the build scripts are much more polished than in years past). Terry

Re: Postfix/Cyrus Forwarding Question

forward file. If you're not sure how the mail is being delivered, it would be useful to follow a single message id in the maillog file and watch exactly what happens to it. Terry

Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email

: open queue file 81D9430101: No such file or directory then it's not a postfix problem. Terry

Re: [Postfix] Wrong Time

Jacopo Cappelli wrote: > On log i have the wrong time(-6h) but the date is ok. > I read that i copy /etc/localtime to the chroot of postfix and i try > but don't work... > cp -p /etc/localtime /var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime > and reload postfix don't work... > I use Debian 5.0.3 tzdata and locale

Re: query about "holding" mails for review...

a significant volume, monitoring the hold queue can easily be a full-time job. Terry

RE: 2 Postfix servers (DMZ + LAN)

Terry Gilsenan Corporate IT Manager InterOil Corporation P: +61 (7) 4046-4698 M: +61 417-600-360 From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of mouss [mo...@ml.netoyen.net] Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 7:01 AM To

RE: Possible for postfix to 'reprocess' a received email?

>Hello > >I have a query and thought hopefully someone can answer. This is a postfix and >dovecot related question so I thought this would be a good place to start. > >I have postfix + dovecot (maildir storage) setup working good. I have some >recipient canonical mapping and some virtual based fo

RE: postfix relay - command line not working

Paul, "This is getting a bit off-topic as regards postfix, being more to do with shell commands and sysadmin skills. " Almost, couple more days and I'll be done with it, lol "That result means your command shell doesn't know where postconf is. Try: 'locate postconf' to find it. Then edit you

RE: cannot find your hostname

On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > As clearly documented in postconf(5), How exactly does one get to that man page? man postconf That of course works. man postconf(5) -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' man postconf5 No manual entry for postconf5 like th

Re: deflecting attacks

e it for generally "spammy" looking mail, since some legitimate emails get huge spam scores until the system "learns" them. Terry

Re: is my server an open relay?"

27;s not appropriate for general use, you could prevent users from sending using bogus email addresses with by using Sender Address Verification on your own servers: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html Terry

Re: Black magic rejecting header Subjects

> It rejects the reception of eMails from within cleanup with the error > code > 5.7.1 message content rejected > and the log reports > [postfix/cleanup] 99C2312CEAC: reject: header Subject: ferte e What does postconf -n say? Terry

  1   2   3   >