Em 25/02/2022 11:39, Wietse Venema escreveu:
Nicolas JEAN:
Tested: adding above randmap also 'supersedes' a local_transport_map
containing the domain-matching "my.domain virtual:"...
I don't understand how "my.domain :" and "my.domain virtual:"
Em 24/02/2022 17:14, Wietse Venema escreveu:
Nicolas JEAN:
Having "my.domain :" or "my.domain lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp"
doesn't modify default behaviour (set by virtual_transport =
lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp), and yields such a log line:
to=, relay=my.do
Em 24/02/2022 14:03, Wietse Venema escreveu:
Nicolas JEAN:
Feb 24 15:18:38 my.domain postfix/smtp[4628]: B08949E76C:
to=, relay=relay2.com[2.2.2.2]:587, delay=0.76,
delays=0.04/0.01/0.38/0.33, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued
as 29A7484FC6)
If I'm correct, thecontact@my.d
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for your quick answer!
Wietse Venema:
/etc/postfix/local_transport_map
my.domain ?? :
.my.domain ? :
(where myhostname = myorigin = virtual_mailbox_domains = my.domain)
Did notice any warnings from Postfix with "do not list domain XXX
in both YYY and ZZZ"?
Not wi
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to implement load balancing thanks to /transport_maps/ and
/randmap/ as described in postfix 3.0 release notes[1].
/etc/postfix/local_transport_map
my.domain :
.my.domain :
(where myhostname = myorigin = virtual_mailbox_domains = my.domain)
Then I have in
Le 07/06/2020 à 20:25, Ralph Seichter a écrit :
> Sources, please. A colleague of Kenyan heritage told me that he is, in his
> own words, "sometimes amused but mostly annoyed by the American political
> correctness movement".
To my European eyes (living in France, born in Austria, Hungarian family
Hi,
I'm currently fine-tuning my mail server (Postfix and Dovecot on CentOS 7).
SPF, DKIM and DMARC work fine, now I'd like to limit the spam tsunami.
Besides the official Postfix documentation, I've read a few articles about
Postfix spam restrictions, namely these :
https://www.linuxbabe.com/m
iktor Dukhovni
Envoyé : samedi 28 septembre 2019 18:18
À : postfix-users@postfix.org
Objet : Re: Virtual Alias Domains
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 03:55:04PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> I'm not sure you understand the issue.
Sadly, you've got the wrong end of the stick. Your logs s
No.
I'm not sure you understand the issue.
Normally both the email must be in virtual file & domain in virtual_domain file.
If the domain is not present in domain file, should be rejected with (MX loops
back to me)
If the email is not in virtual, should be rejected with (user unknow)
I tried to
t;!/file/name" is supported only
in Postfix version 2.4 and later.
-Message d'origine-
De : owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org De la
part de Wietse Venema
Envoyé : samedi 28 septembre 2019 15:47
À : Postfix users
Objet : Re: Virtual Alias Domains
Nicolas Breuer:
>
> Hello,
&
Hello,
I'm running Postfix 3.
I try to add a mailbox without aliasing the domain.
The delivery is accepted, should not be because the domain is not in local
domain file ?
virtual_alias_domains = /etc/postfix/local-host-names
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
See
d at the ehlo command
Postfix SMTP server announces SMTPUTF8 support in the
EHLO response.
Good luck.
Nicolas.
On 22 November 2017 at 08:46, wodel youchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some clarification about Content-Type on an email.
>
> Who does fix the Content-Type of an emai
El 2017-11-03 15:15, Noel Jones escribió:
On 11/3/2017 6:26 AM, nico...@devels.es wrote:
El 2017-11-03 11:05, wie...@porcupine.org escribió:
Noel Jones:
On 11/2/2017 7:48 AM, nico...@devels.es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.9.6 and I'm trying to do a conditional
sender
> rewrite based
El 2017-11-03 11:05, wie...@porcupine.org escribió:
Noel Jones:
On 11/2/2017 7:48 AM, nico...@devels.es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.9.6 and I'm trying to do a conditional sender
> rewrite based on recipient address. Machine sends e-mails as
> r...@internal-domain.com by default, but i
Hi,
I'm running Postfix 2.9.6 and I'm trying to do a conditional sender
rewrite based on recipient address. Machine sends e-mails as
r...@internal-domain.com by default, but if the recipient is
u...@external-domain.com I want to rewrite sender to be
r...@different-domain.com.
To do so, I've
There also this project:
https://sourceforge.net/p/x-itools/wiki/Home/
Le 22/08/2016 à 03:42, Steve Atkins a écrit :
On Aug 21, 2016, at 5:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Schetterer:
Am 21.08.2016 um 05:10 schrieb Steve Atkins:
I find I need to extract a list of deliveries, and delivery
El 2016-02-04 13:24, wie...@porcupine.org escribió:
nico...@devels.es:
Hi,
What would be the equivalent of negative look-ahead assertions in
Postfix's map files?
1) Postfix has are table-driven features such as canonical_maps,
alias_maps, etc.
2) These features use table lookup mechanisms
Hi,
What would be the equivalent of negative look-ahead assertions in
Postfix's map files?
I have:
main.cf:
sender_canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/canonical_maps
/etc/postfix/canonical_maps:
/^((?!foo[0-9]+).*)@domain1.com$/ ${1}@domain2.com
I want that any mail that comes from
El 2016-01-19 18:37, wie...@porcupine.org escribió:
Nicol?s:
Hi,
We have a filter located outside our organization for outgoing mail
which rewrites the Return-Path to their domain, in the form:
username=abc@theirdomain.com. Once the filter processes the
message,
it's forwarded to the dest
Is 104.200.78.121 listed in your $permit_mynetworks parameter, or a CIDR
that contains it?
Did you postmap /etc/postfix/sasl_access?
Did you try c...@dom.org.au as entry?
Did you try cas@ as entry?
Regards,
Nicolás
El 2015-10-07 14:47, Voytek escribió:
On Thu, October 8, 2015 12:42 am, Viktor
El 2015-08-26 11:41, Antonio Alberola escribió:
Hello,
I would like know if it's possible to block outgoing emails with a
specific
subject, but only if the email is sent to a specific recipient.
Thanks,
Antonio Alberola
It is possible but you will need to build your own filter to do that (o
El 2015-08-18 17:33, Alex escribió:
Hi,
If that is the preferred method, what is the real purpose of
header_checks? Solely for Subject and To?
Even more useful than checking the Subject, I use header_checks to check
some properties on attachments. In fact, I've picked Wietse's example on
th
El 2015-08-18 16:15, Alex escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to match a pattern in a header_checks pcre file and can't
figure out why it's not matching. In /etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre,
I have:
/^From:.*exampleuser@gmail\.com$/ REJECT
# postmap -q 'exampleuser' pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
#
Those lines make no harm, although they may become annoying. I guess
that an external tool like Fail2Ban can be very helpful here, but be
careful to establish an ample enough policy in the Fail2Ban service to
not block your own users if they fail to authenticate against your mail
server.
Rega
El 2015-03-12 12:31, Krinninger, Reinhold escribió:
Hello,
i use this header_check:
I assume that you're actually using header_checks (ended in **s**) and
that your table type is regex: in order this to work.
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
/^From: (?!.*\/ REJECT seems to be
spam,
isn't i
El 2015-03-09 21:31, Roger Walters escribió:
Hello,
I have a few chained content filters based on pipe, so when the first
script ends its task, it sends the processed headers to the second
script and so on.
It is clear how to get the content back to Postfix as an input, using
the sendmail comma
stfix Policy Server has a built-in *SPF engine*, and
SPF rules can be implemented using the ELSE Web user Interface. It's
also updated for Postfix v3.
- The *ELSE* implements *GeoIP* (from MaxMind) and *Google MAPS*: it's
possible to see the location of any IP Address on a google MAP.
Enjo
Hello,
The X-Itools ELSE (https://sourceforge.net/p/x-itools/wiki/) can also do
it but it's maybe a too big thing for what you want to do. Version
0.9.19 has been released yesterday evening.
Best regards
Nicolas
PGP fingerprint: 5F35 862E 00E1 D774 7FA4 3A71 EBED FA58 58C6 45D2
Le 25/02
El 2015-02-24 13:40, Laurent RAYSSIGUIER escribió:
Hello,
I'll need to build a mail relay which is able to count how many emails
are send by an sasl sender per month.
5000 mails per month for this one, 3000 for another one, etc…
Is there a way with postfix to do this ?
I need addon or interna
- Have you identified the e-mail server having those compromised
accounts? If yes forbid this server to relay using your Postfix servers.
If you don't want or cannot do it...
- Then have you identified what e-mail accounts exactly are compromised?
If yes temporarily close or disabled those accou
ot; to take a routing decision regarding the
recipient email address...
Well, a kind of...
Or if I understand you well, if your goal is to send all email flow of
u...@test.com sender systematically to the same recipient (user1), you
probably need a routing decision taken only on the sender email
Firewall solution*, or
- *a mix of "Postfix/Anvil", "Fail2ban", "Firewall", "Monitoring",
"Reporting"*
Enjoy :)
--
Nicolas
<>
ction will only delay the problem.
The mail relay of my work lab was hit by this last week.
--
Nicolas
ivered
> without being archived. With the above, mail might be delivered
> first, and then the mail server disk crashes, and the archive copy
> is never sent.
Point taken, but it’s still much better than the current situation where
up to 24 hours of e-mail may be lost…
Cheers,
--
Nicolas Boullis
nsider writing a Y proxy myself, but I think this would be
very error-prone. For example I’m not sure what I should do if one
destination suceeds while the other one fails…
Cheers,
--
Nicolas Boullis
rt map.
Thanks anyway for the suggestion.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Boullis
hack, and makes it somewhat more complex to reimport that backup as I
have to rewrite the recipients.
So is there a way I can ask Postifix, in my recipent_bcc map that the
message hould be copied to sameu...@example.net *with the bsmtp
transport*?
Cheers,
--
Nicolas Boullis
4 | PASS OLD | 7
2 | PREGREET | 6
3 | HANGUP | 6
5 | PASS NEW | 1
It's just incredible the number of emails dropped by DNSBL!!
Regards,
Nicolas HAHN
Le 29/08/2014 08:40, Nicolas HAHN a écrit :
Hello there,
I'll also take any material or log file snippet provide
Hello there,
I'll also take any material or log file snippet provided about
postscreen to implement a parser in the ELSE project, and generate any
usefull stats.
Regards,
Nicolas HAHN
Le 29/08/2014 01:57, Jim Seymour a écrit :
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:12:12 +0200
"li...@rhsoft.n
er to the email you sent me also, in
order to not pollute to much the Postfix mailing list. If any other are
interested, let me know.
Best regards,
Nicolas HAHN
Le 21/08/2014 23:03, Ronald F. Guilmette a écrit :
Is there anything which is either a part of, or that works
with Postfix tha
on of that in my greylister...
Best regards,
Nicolas
Le 21/08/2014 23:30, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 8/21/2014 4:03 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there anything which is either a part of, or that works
with Postfix that is capable of automagically maintaining
a personal whitelist of specific e
El 2014-08-12 22:29, pavel degtiarev escribió:
Hi there,
I know this is a common error but I swear I checked everything, yet
still get that error trying to setup Postfix with Cyrus SASL on Debian
wheezy.
Here’s my confgs:
/etc/postfix/sasl/smtp.comf:
Be careful with the extension. cyrus_sasl
ks.*
Regards,
Nicolas
<>
I'll answer you in private soon Beeny to not polute postfix mailing list.
Le 19/04/2014 14:44, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
if its time to test it ?
is there a maillist for this project ?
or even code download link ?
wiki ?
<>
This is preferred usage. Closing the socket after each reply is wasteful.
Wietse
Thanks for the answer. Comments from Jan P. Kessler helped also.
I've updated my code to keep connections opened unless a configurable
timeout. According my tests, I've new data:
- GreyLSE is now rated
Le 18/04/2014 10:17, Jan P. Kessler a écrit :
Hi,
maybe you should set up an own mailing list for GreyLSE. The are a lot
of coders at this list. If any of them would use this list to discuss
their own topics it might become somewhat confusing here.
You're right, old, historycal mailing lists e
to compile it with various DB libs... Why not...
SQL backend for greylisting and most other stuff is pretty pointless and
awkward to set up. My own perl greylister simply stores everything in
memory and easily performs 5000+ requests per second. If you need more
redundancy, you could simply
an no database abstraction alyer is *really not* the performance problem
to excuse a "vendor-lockin" or to say it in other words: if you start
these days a proect and the frist decision you make is what RDBMS you
will use your whole software design is broken from that moment
Again, we'll see
MySQL... :)
don't get me wrong but abstraction layers exists
http://www.tildeslash.com/libzdb/
nobody needs to write backends for every database
frankly for a greylisting daemon there is no need for a full-featured database
server
like MySQl or PostgrSQL, in context of postfix it should at l
In short, the GreyLSE is:
- a daemon made with C/C++
- needs the PostgreSQL database of the ELSE because works only with that
forget it - starting 2014 and limit to a single DB backend is crazy
Hummm... It's a new tool... The possibility to use other backends in the
futur is not closed speci
this is up to
the policy server to check if the instance variable "change" at some
point... i could test all of that in a lab but if it's faster to get an
answer from there...
Best regards,
--
Nicolas HAHN
<>
KS.
Kind regards,
Nicolas
gt; your ISP finally catches up.
I did half of this.
On my home server, I disabled IPv6 on the postfix smtp client. The smtp
server still accepts incoming IPv6 connections.
I did not see any problem since then.
--
Nicolas
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:15:46AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:44:55AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Argh. You need to replace the 5.X.X.
> > >
> > > This pattern replaces both fives just to be sure.
>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:15:46AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:44:55AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Argh. You need to replace the 5.X.X.
> > >
> > > This pattern replaces both fives just to be sure.
>
ow must be the return code for the mail to be retried to another host?
"450 " or "450- " ?
Thanks,
--
Nicolas
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:23:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nicolas KOWALSKI:
> > I am not able to have an IPv6 rDNS record with my ISP, only an IPv4 one.
> > I guess this is why it works when using IPv4 (tested by forcing
> > inet_protocols = ipv4), and does not wo
,
--
Nicolas
ols/files/X-Itools%20releases/E-mail%20Log%20Search%20Engine/
*Please note that all releases of this software are considered R&D. Use
it at your own risks.*
Kind regards,
Nicolas
<>
you in private.
Envoyé de mon iPad
Le 24 avr. 2013 à 20:00, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Nicolas HAHN:
>> The "archietcture" is not a good excuse for me, I'm sorry. As a
>> coder, allowing a software to start despite the fact there is a
>> FATAL is a total non-sens.
> sorry, but after following the thread you are not qualified
> enough to judge design-patterns of a software you do not
> understand enough
I agree totally on that. That's why I write in the users mailing list, not in
the developpers mailing list.
To stop this thread that is borring for everybo
You're right that's enough and I'll answer you in private.
Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Nicolas HAHN:
>> The "archietcture" is not a good excuse for me, I'm sorry. As a
>> coder, allowing a software to start despite the fact there is a
>> FATAL i
files:
[root@server nagios]# service nagios restart
Running configuration check...done.
Stopping nagios: ...done.
Starting nagios: done.
[root@server nagios]#
But OK I understand your points and will stop to post my blabla.
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Nicol
Yea. Thanks, i've seen it the first time you posted it.
But that's not for this reason I'll change my mind about this.
BR.
nicolas
Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Nicolas HAHN:
>> What I consider just abnormal as already written is that for me
>> (so it's my opini
> Can you post the fatal error messages you found, especially the
> messages that log why the queue manager was restarting, as that
> is the real problem.
Here is what I found:
2013-04-24T10:04:38.005665+00:00 iccpfxor04 postfix/local[9370]: fatal: main.cf
configuration error: mailbox_size_limit
This is a reply to myself because I'm reviewing the way it works.
> Yes, but if I'm right, the log message is emitted at the time there
> is an e-mail processed (by postfix/local for my issue).
In fact, the fatal is written in the logs each minute and 1 second for this
issue in my case by the
versions 0.9.14
or 0.9.15.
There is always something positive to take somewhere :)
BR.
nicolas
Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Nicolas HAHN:
>> Postfix feature request: that would be nice that Postfix be able
>> to do this kind of basic checks by itself when starting (or when
>
oaded, and REFUSE to start because of "fatal: main.cf configuration error:
mailbox_size_limit is smaller than message_size_limit".
Don't you think?
But I learn I learn (well... I try)
Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Nicolas HAHN:
>> Postfix feature request: that would be nice
> 1. Don't send bounces to postmaster, just generate and read log summaries
> that may highlight aggregate problems with your mail stream.
>
> notify_classes =
>
> This applies to any MTA handing mail for a large number of users,
> it is fine to have postmaster notices for a ma
c checks by itself when starting (or when configuration is
reloaded) between various inter-dependent configuration settings, and display
in the logs at least some warnings when such kind of issue is detected :)
Best regards,
Nicolas
--
> Postfix memory usage does not depend on message size. Far more
> likely some filter has message size issues, or perhaps mailbox_size_limit
> has not been raised to match, or the OP failed to reload Postfix, so that
> the message size limit was different in some processes.
Each time I've reloade
to command: /bin/bash /usr/local/bin/captureNDR)
2013-04-24T12:41:14.125943+00:00 iccpfxor04 postfix/qmgr[27707]: 6B34360BAA:
removed
Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>
> Am 24.04.2013 14:58, schrieb Nicolas HAHN:
>> Does somebody knows what is happening?
>
> no because you mi
mebody knows what is happening? Does somebody had this issue?
Is there a known limit we cannot go above for message_size_limit setting in
main.cf?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Nicolas
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
adapt it for Postfix versions > 2.8 logs in the comming days, and I
hope except the QID, the format of the logs is the same :-)
I'm available if you wish to answer questions and provide information/support
as I need to create and provide complete set of documentations.
Kind
%20releases/E-mail%20Log%20Search%20Engine/
Now will start to commit version 0.9.12 :)
Kind regards,
Nicolas
<>
and this means it's not validated for other OS than RHEL 6.
But again, if people in the community want to deploy it, test it,
install it, debug it, validate it on other platforms, then that will be
a win-win deal for sure :)
There are so much to be done...
Kind regards,
Nicolas
<>
1:31, LuKreme a écrit :
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:29, Nicolas HAHN wrote:
a Linux server
It requires Linux? Why would it require Linux?
<>
size is
limited to 4 characters./
Thanks for your attention
Best regards,
Nicolas
<>
Dear Postfix Community,
Instead of reading in my previous email:
"The archive I just uploaded this morning deal with Postfix version
>=2.8.x logs."
Please read:
"The archive I just uploaded this morning deal with Postfix version
_*<=2.8.x*_ logs."
This is a misstyping from me ;)
<>
t; where "someone" is a valid local user, and "example.com" is listed
> in mydestination.
This works perfectly.
Thanks a lot Noel.
--
Nicolas
on how to configure postfix this way?
Thanks,
--
Nicolas
Le 20/03/2012 17:53, Noel Jones a écrit :
You sure that mail is really from hotmail? The IP shown in your log
snippit is owned by Microsoft, but doesn't seem to have an rDNS
hostname; that's quite unusual for hotmail as it's common practice
to reject clients with no rDNS. And the HELO name does
Hi,
I'm an Austrian Linux user living and working in South France.
I've just setup a basic - and working - mail server on Debian Squeeze,
using Postfix and Dovecot.
I've installed policyd-weight for basic spam filtering. Since the
defaults are quite restrictive, I thought I'd try with a bit
On 06/27/2011 11:24 AM, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
Salut,
On 27 juin 2011, at 11:09, Nicolas Michel wrote:
I have mails in the queue (I can see them with mailq).
A) I want to delete them
- postqueue -f
nope, it will just flush the queue (force a new delivery attempt)
- postsuper -d ALL
Hello,
I have a few simple questions to be sure using the right commands to do
what I want :
Situation
-
I have mails in the queue (I can see them with mailq).
A) I want to delete them
- postqueue -f
- postsuper -d ALL
- mailq | awk '{if (NF == 7) print $1'} | postsuper -d -
Are thes
Hello,
I was asking myself about the kind of connection used by a MTA to
contact another one.
For exemple, I know that we can setup in a MUA an SSL (or TLS)
connection when configuring the SMTP connection. So the connection
between the MUA and the MTA is encrypted.
But can we configure postf
On 08/09/2010 10:43 PM, Martin Schütte wrote:
On 08/09/10 16:29, Nicolas Michel wrote:
I want to know if there is a way to reject connections from host not
listed in the MX records of the domain it claims to be.
Try http://www.policyd-weight.org/
It checks and compares the client IP, its
On 08/09/2010 06:34 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Nicolas Michel put forth on 8/9/2010 9:29 AM:
For example : a host with IP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ try so send a mail to my
domain (we'll call it mydomain.be) and claims that the sender is
u...@otherdomain.com
Example of forging, typical of spa
On 08/09/2010 05:15 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/9/2010 9:29 AM, Nicolas Michel wrote:
Hello,
I want to know if there is a way to reject connections from
host not listed in the MX records of the domain it claims to be.
For example : a host with IP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ try so send a
mail to my domain
Hello,
I want to know if there is a way to reject connections from host not
listed in the MX records of the domain it claims to be.
For example : a host with IP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ try so send a mail to my
domain (we'll call it mydomain.be) and claims that the sender is
u...@otherdomain.com
If
refork=1
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
mailbox_transport = cyrus:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
IMHO mailbox_transport should be set to
lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/public/lmtp
--
NIcolas
I respond for myself. I forgot a "t" to the "result_atribute = mail" ...
Nicolas Michel a écrit :
I get the connection but I don't know why, I can't get a result :
postmap: dict_ldap_lookup: In dict_ldap_lookup
postmap: dict_ldap_lookup: No existing c
4 Sep 2009 08:55:36 +0200
De:
Nicolas Michel
Pour ::
postfix-users@postfix.org
Références:
<4a9fa2a1.8030...@lemail.be>
<20090903140523.gz31...@hn305c2n2.ms.com>
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Thu, Sep
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Nicolas Michel wrote:
In that file (ldap-localusers.cf), I set this :
server_host = zimbra.pcsol.be
search_base = ou=people,dc=pcsol,dc=be
query_filter = (&(mail=%s)(accountStatus=ac
Olivier Nicole a écrit :
Nicolas,
server_host = zimbra.pcsol.be
Are you sure your server is running on port 389? Would you run TLS?
>From your Postfix machine, can you access the LDAP server on zimbra
machine (no firewall)?
I would try ldapsearch command on
Hello,
I have a zimbra server for managing mail accounts. I have a postfix
mail server before it. Mails from outdoor arrive on that server before
being relayed to the zimbra server.
I want to search from the postfix server into the ldap of zimbra the
users/aliases to reject every mail destina
e_options=no_address_mappings
Regards,
Nicolas
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:00:26 +0200
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
> I use Postfix 2.4.7.
>
> In other terms, I don't want virtual_alias_maps be read in these two lines:
>
> 1
> >smtp inet n - n - -
-f
> -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
If virtual_alias_maps is read in these two lines, there's problem with this
configuration:
> us...@domain.tld us...@domain.tld
> us...@domain.tld us...@domain.tld
I hope you could help me.
Regards,
Nicolas
' because the
script do:
>sendmail -oi -f sen...@domain.tld us...@domain.tld (and send two mails ->
>user1@ and user2@)
>sendmail -oi -f sen...@domain.tld us...@domain.tld
So, user2@ receive two mails.
Do you have an idea to prevent this problem? Any advices?
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
--
-Nicolas.
Thank you a lot.
I didn't know that solution.
Le mardi 26 mai 2009 à 07:34 -0500, Noel Jones a écrit :
> Nicolas Michel wrote:
> > Thanks for your help. But that tips is not really what I'm searching
> > for. The class restriction is a global restriction : some users
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
