Re: Log Table Lookup Result

On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:20 PM Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > Also I know syslog_name has a max length, but couldn't find the > documentation on it. > Sorry, what I am referring to is probably a syslog limitation, not postfix.

Re: Log Table Lookup Result

ax length, but couldn't find the documentation on it. Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Log Table Lookup Result

On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 3:27 PM Mehmet Avcioglu wrote: > Is it possible to log the result of a table lookup? Perhaps similar to the > header_checks INFO option. > I guess it is not. I can write a daemon that acts like a tcp map and log the results, but I wouldn't be able to m

Re: milter library for PHP (libMilterPHP)

Looks great. I'll definitely give it a try. Just a small initial feedback; I am a big fan of PSR4 and PSR12, they make PHP look cool :) -- Mehmet On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 1:02 PM wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I wrote a milter library for PHP, because I wanted to create a bun

Log Table Lookup Result

Is it possible to log the result of a table lookup? Perhaps similar to the header_checks INFO option. Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: warning: too many reverse jump records

a metrics exporter like this) on a busy server like this at all - run it but run it less frequently on normal non-patched postfix - run it less frequently and also apply the patch you had sent Thank you -- Mehmet

Re: warning: too many reverse jump records

Wietse Venema: > > Mehmet Avcioglu: > > I am getting "too many reverse jump records" messages. Couldn't find > > any information about this message and looking at the source code > > The postfix/showq logging repeats the same error for the same file, > ev

warning: too many reverse jump records

0 2.0.0 Message accepted for delivery) 2021-07-13T17:34:06.915500+00:00 server01 postfix/qmgr[1283513]: 4GPKc12345z6n5pV: removed Thank you -- Mehmet

Custom 250 OK message

Is it possible to return a custom 250 OK message? Currently postfix returns "250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as queue_id". Would it be possible to change or add to this message via a lookup table or milter? Thank you -- Mehmet

Milter protocol deleting and adding the same recipient

:15:22 server postfix/smtpd[264815]: disconnect from server.local[127.0.0.1] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5 >From what I understand the duplicate filter suppresses the address. Is this desired behavior? Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Postfix Configure Some Users Not Receive Emails

mehmet gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > I am using postfix with latest version for smtp. And for pop3, I am using > dovecot with Maildir. > Postfix is running on centos. > > I have couple of users on the system (I have created users with useradd > command with

Postfix Configure Some Users Not Receive Emails

? Regards Mehmet

Re: Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

y, but I'll use queue_id@hostname instead. Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: > > Can long queue_ids be used as a globally unique identifier within a multi > > server setup? > > As documented, the queue ID is made up from inode number and time. > The inode number is

Long queue_id collision probability with multiple servers?

a mathematically sound reason to use them for this purpose or not. Any ideas? Thanks -- Mehmet

Preventing sendmail -f option

Is there a way to prevent sendmail -f option from being used to change the envelope sender address? Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Receiving one mail at a time

ages. Regardless, no need to discuss my laziness any further, so touché.:) -- Mehmet Avcioglu

Re: Receiving one mail at a time

going to the lists, but googling "smtp rfc" didn't reveal the right one easily. -- Mehmet Avcioglu

Receiving one mail at a time

like default_destination_recipient_limit=1 but in reverse. I am trying to implement a policy based filter where one recipient could select to accept a certain mail and the other does not without having to accept for both recipients and bounce for one. Thank you in advance -- Mehmet Avcioglu

Single copy between hops

postfix spool. Normally it is sent multiple times to the next hop even if they are all going to the same place. Is there a way to change this behavior? Thanks -- Mehmet

postfix server disconnects immediately

backup servers for an mail. I couldn't spot anything in it but lets hope I missed something... Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Best, Mehmet. Mar 22 09:20:33 gollum postfix/smtpd[21768]: connect from euclid.junkemailfilter.com[184.105.182.40] Mar 22 09:20:33 gollum po

Re: SASL / LDAP authentication, multiple domains

I fixed it by using the ldap_filter parameter instead of ldap_search_base. -- Mehmet On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu wrote: > This is probably not a postfix issue but I figured I should ask this > list anyway. > > In /etc/saslauthd.conf I have the following an

SASL / LDAP authentication, multiple domains

p has multiple domains with varying numbers of "." in them. I am obviously missing something but not sure what. Any ideas? Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Non-smtp milter application and sasl macros

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> I have a milter application that works fine for smtp but throws >> undefined macro error messages for non-smtp. > > As far as I can tell in a few minutes time, Postfix sends no > auth_mumbl

Non-smtp milter application and sasl macros

em on milter_rcpt_macros and milter_mail_macros. just wondering if I am missing something? Thanks -- Mehmet

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> >> I eventually fixed it by adding a transport rule "* >> >> relay:127.0.0.1:10025

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:48:45PM -0400, Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu wrote: > >> Tried that and got the following: >> >> fatal: bad string length 0 < 1: inet_interfaces = > > Yes, you can set "inet_interfac

Re: Running postfix along with another MTA

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu: >> I eventually fixed it by adding a transport rule "* >> relay:127.0.0.1:10025" and having the other MTA listen on 10025, but >> wondering if this is the best way. I would rather touc

Running postfix along with another MTA

o some configuration there. Any suggestions would be appreciated. -- Mehmet