Hi,
is it possible to send NDR / bounce only to a list of predefined
domains? I want to send NDR only to my local domains and discard it
for other domains. Thanks for hints.
azur
Citát Wietse Venema :
I'm adding a new field to the Postfix queue file that says if a
message was forcibly expired. The field is set with the postsuper
command, using syntax that is similar to other postsuper commands.
The new option behaves like 'delete' except of course that it sets
a flag
Citát "@lbutlr" :
On 15 Jan 2020, at 15:12, Noel Jones wrote:
We've had problems with users mistyping domain names, such as
hotmal.com or aoil.com. And they ignore the delay warning message
because they still don't notice their typo.
Then they get the bounce when the max queue expires.
Citát Wietse Venema :
azu...@pobox.sk:
Cit?t Wietse Venema :
> azu...@pobox.sk:
>>
>> Cit?t Wietse Venema :
>>
>> > Emanuel:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> It's possible bouncing email manually with the ID in the queue?
>> >>
>> >> In the documentati?n from de the command postqueue or postsuper i
Citát Wietse Venema :
azu...@pobox.sk:
Cit?t Wietse Venema :
> Emanuel:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It's possible bouncing email manually with the ID in the queue?
>>
>> In the documentati?n from de the command postqueue or postsuper i not
>> find any information.
>
> That's because bounce by ID is not
Citát Wietse Venema :
Emanuel:
Hello,
It's possible bouncing email manually with the ID in the queue?
In the documentati?n from de the command postqueue or postsuper i not
find any information.
That's because bounce by ID is not supported.
You can bounce all mail for a specific recipient
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender
check_sasl_access hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_access
check_sasl_access hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_access_2
reject_sender_login_mismatch
That should work just fine.
What errors did you get?
Sorry, i probably did something wrong while testing, thi
Hi,
is it possible to specify multiple tables for check_sender_access used
in smtpd_sender_restrictions? Few examples i tried (none worked):
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender
check_sasl_access hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_access
hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_access_2
reject_sende
Citát Wietse Venema :
azu...@pobox.sk:
Hi,
i'm having quite severe problems with append_at_myorigin - Postfix is
appending myorigin to sneder name if it contains a colon character and
is encoded into quoted-printable format, for example (generated by
Thunderbird):
From: =?UTF-8?Q?TEST:_som=c
Hi,
i'm having quite severe problems with append_at_myorigin - Postfix is
appending myorigin to sneder name if it contains a colon character and
is encoded into quoted-printable format, for example (generated by
Thunderbird):
From: =?UTF-8?Q?TEST:_som=c3=a9thing?=
This is rewritten to:
>I have an outgoing-only mail server for our customers called
>smtp.lightlink.com. It only allows relaying from local IP's,
>and known virtual domains if remote users wish to use it.
>
> We were fine when we were running pop before smtp authentication, but
>I was forced to also allow SASL aut
>Am 20.09.2013 22:03, schrieb azurIt:
>> One note to all fans of 'spam filters rejecting' here: Did you even notice
>> that
>> NO ONE of big e-mail providers are rejecting messages based on standard spam
>> filter techniques?
>> Google, Yahoo, Micro
>>> On 2013-09-20 09:42, azurIt wrote:
>>>> i'm having problems with spam forwarding - lot's of our users enabled
>>>> forwarding to gmail and every spam they receive is also forwarded.
>>>> Today gmail block us because of spam (which we were
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>azurIt:
>> I was just friendly ASKING, if Postfix is able to _not_ forward a
>> message based on it's headers.
>
>Assumung that these headers are added by a spam filter, this would
>require a Milter plugin that examines messages a
>azurIt wrote:
>
>> I don't believe in rejecting e-mails based on spam checks - there are and
>> always be false positives. I will rather accept 100 spams than reject single
>> legitimate e-mail message.
>
>Spam volume these days is such that accepting, proce
>Am 20.09.2013 19:31, schrieb azurIt:
>> I don't believe in rejecting e-mails based on spam checks - there are and
>> always be false positives. I will rather accept 100 spams than reject single
>> legitimate e-mail message.
>
>ok ,so why cry about your own
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM, azurIt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm having problems with spam forwarding - lot's of our users enabled
>> forwarding to gmail and every spam they receive is also forwarded. Today
>> g
>On 2013-09-20 09:42, azurIt wrote:
>> i'm having problems with spam forwarding - lot's of our users enabled
>> forwarding to gmail and every spam they receive is also forwarded.
>> Today gmail block us because of spam (which we were just forwarding,
>> not
>On Sep 20, 2013, at 18:21, azurIt wrote:
>
>>> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM, azurIt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i'm having problems with spam forwarding - lot's of our users
Hi,
i'm having problems with spam forwarding - lot's of our users enabled
forwarding to gmail and every spam they receive is also forwarded. Today gmail
block us because of spam (which we were just forwarding, not sending). Any tips
how can i disable forwarding in case of a spam (for example, w
20 matches
Mail list logo
