On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
> time at random intervals, usually a time more or less than a real,
> "accredited" smtp server would wait before retrying delivery. So, we need a
> postscreen_bare_newline_minwait and postscreen_bare_newline_maxwait, which
> would be the minimum a
On 11/29/2010 12:28 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
We simply alias
$user $u...@$othermailserver
The $users we forward to are known by our mail server and no mail will
forward otherwise. I cannot think of a scenario which rejected mail
from $othermailserver would be anything other than UCE in this
On Nov 24, 2010, at 1:50 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You'd be better off with SliceHost (RackSpace) than HE, and SliceHost
> sucks from a delivery standpoint.
Hmm... Interesting. Delivery as in transactional or bulk? I only had one or
two slices from them, and off the bat had decent reputation
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Makes sense. I will keep a set of MX servers at the original COLO setup to
> accept emails from my new range and forward outgoing email through them until
> we verify the new one.
>
> Gary Smith
For receiving emails, you don't have too much
On Nov 23, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
> I'm expecting to setup 5 IP's for outgoing email and as such the RNDS records
> for them as well. I just want to make sure that there's little, if any,
> problems for myself and my customers that use my services.
Hi Gary,
You'll probably want
On 11/15/2010 04:31 AM, Ignacio García wrote:
Is it possible to block sending emails from local accounts if many
bounces have been generated from this local account? Example, a user
is sending many messages to wrong addresses. I want postfix not to let
him send more messages temporarily. Is i
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:28 AM, John Hinton wrote:
>
> And, as our client base is controlled and are not spammer, avoiding all spam
> checks on outbound is awesome. I used milters in sendmail in order to do
> rejects and those checked all in and all out.
>
Hi John,
What do you mean by "controll
On 11/09/2010 04:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The Proliant Dl180 g6 box he has will scale to 192GB RAM in 12 DIMM
slots, but getting it there gets expensive due to the cost/DIMM at 16GB
density. Using fairly inexpensive 4GB DIMMS he could occupy 6 of the 12
slots for a 24GB capacity. That should
On 11/08/2010 11:13 AM, Luiz Antonio Emerenciano Alcoforado wrote:
So, I'll never acomplish a complete fallback setup.
It is true?
What'll happen if I try it?
You mentioned this was on the same network. Just wondering, would it be
possible to do this at the router/network level?
-will
On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> I've gotten myself into a somewhat heated discussion... which seems to
> be the only kind I get into these days... on another mailing list
> regarding the spam outflow filtering capabilities of one particular
> non-Posfix based e-mail servic
On 11/05/2010 12:41 PM, Alejandro Facultad wrote:
Thanks but, is it right if coming from Internet I enter to your mail
server and after that I send a message from your mail account to your
project manager's mail account telling he's an asshole ???
I now SPF is ideal for avoid this behavior, bu
On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Richard Stockton wrote:
> I think I sent this to the wrong address, so I'm trying again...
>
> I have a client trying to send to more than the allowed number of
> recipients (smtpd_recipient_limit = 100). On the server side the
> only indication I see in the maillog i
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I have SPF setup and Postfix is rejecting mail from explicitly unauthorized
> servers. If a customer wants me to customize the configuration so that they
> can receive mail from that server, is that wrong? Their current SPF TXT
> record co
13 matches
Mail list logo
