On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:55:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ulrich Zehl:
> > Oct 23 22:44:18 zwirn postfix/master[18457]: daemon started -- version
> > 3.1.6, configuration /etc/postfix
> > Oct 23 22:44:25 zwirn postfix/sendmail[18460]: fatal: unsupported
> > d
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:44:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ulrich Zehl:
> > When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
> > 3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
> > type: cdb".
>
> What is the
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:37:19PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> On October 23, 2017 9:15:17 AM EDT, Ulrich Zehl
> wrote:
> >When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
> >3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupport
When I try to use a CDB table for authorized_submit_users with Postfix
3.1.6, the sendmail command exits with error "unsupported dictionary
type: cdb".
To reproduce:
# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 3.1.6
# postconf -n
authorized_submit_users = cdb:/etc/postfix/authorized_users
# cat
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:45:35PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> They don't have "hairpin NAT" set up, whereby if I try to connect to
> this NATed IP address it would go to the router and come back to me.
> I'm fine with that, actually; while that would solve the instant
> problem, it could be bad i
On a mail gateway, I want to masquerade envelope senders from certain
clients only; for all other clients, no envelope information should be
rewritten. According to ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#masquerade, I should
be able to do this by setting local_header_rewrite_clients appropriately.
However,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:52:54PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Yes, I would always choose telnet first. Unfortunately, if you want
> to test an encrypted session telnet fails miserably.
>
> The [press R to renegotiate] behavior of s_client is documented and,
> last time I looked, can't be disabled
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL
wrote:
> Is there a command line trick to test pipelining?
swaks (http://jetmore.org/john/code/swaks/) can do pipelining.
swaks --pipeline -f ulr...@topfen.net -t ulr...@topfen.net
It's a perl program, so I do
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a database every five
minutes or so, even if there are no
