Hello Matus,
> for blocking .artegic.net you don't need to use pcre.
> simple hash table containing ".artegic.net" would be faster.
I see. Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
Thomas
Hello Ansgar,
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> ...
> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/client_access.pcre
> /\.artegic\.net$/ REJECT Not accepting mail from your domain.
thank you. I put that in my configuration. I already had
check_client_access under smtpd_client_restrictions but as
Hello,
my bank ing-diba is using a marketing company to spam me. They have many
outgoing mail servers and I would like to block them all.
> Received: from mout-1605.artegic.net (mout-1605.artegic.net [144.76.159.198])
> (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
Hello Noel,
> Note: stripping Received: headers is generally considered bad practice
> since it removes important tracking and debug information. Some
> anti-spam engines will penalize mail with no Received: headers.
I don't like it either but I want to hide the originating system.
> Your maste
Hello,
I would like to strip received headers and change the helo_name for
outgoing e-mail fone _one_ transport for _one_ recipient domain.
Everything else I want to leave as it is. What is the best way to obtain
that, should I use a second instance with the helo_name and
header_checks in place and
Hello everyone,
I have problem receiving e-mails via STARTSSL from the hays mailservers. It
bails out with the following error message. My mailserver is infra.glanzmann.de
and I have no trouble receiving or sending e-mail via startssl to a various
mailserver with official or unofficial signed certi
Hello,
> > a way to tell postfix to don't re-read the config files
> No. By design Postfix daemons periodically commit suicide and, when
> restarted, have no option but to read the configuration files.
I thought so. Thanks a lot.
Thomas
Hello everyone,
a week ago I had a problem with a productive e-mail server rejecting
e-mail because an automatic configuration tool (cfengine) failed on me
and rolled out the wrong configuration file. After a very short amount
of time (less than an hour) postfix picked up the new configuration
file
Hello Wietse,
* Wietse Venema [090210 15:11]:
> > I still don't get why postfix sends me a soft bounce to notify me
> > that I'm running out of diskspace.
> Have you looked at the LOGFILE?
Not yet, but now I have and I don't like what I see:
Feb 10 01:16:14 erld603x postfix/smtpd[4269]: conne
Hello Wietse,
* Wietse Venema [090210 14:55]:
> Thomas Glanzmann:
> > Out: 220 erld671x.erlf.siemens.de ESMTP Postfix
> > In: EHLO erld603x.erlf.siemens.de
> > Out: 250-erld671x.erlf.siemens.de
> > Out: 250-PIPELINING
> > Out: 250-SIZE 104857600
>
Hello,
I have two postfix systems which generate a lot of double bounces. I was
able to extract such an e-mail using wireshark:
220 erld671x.erlf.siemens.de ESMTP Postfix
EHLO erld604x.erlf.siemens.de
250-erld671x.erlf.siemens.de
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 104857600
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250 8BITMIME
MAI
11 matches
Mail list logo
