Re: Setting default account for local users - sender_canonical_maps?

2020-07-02 Thread Silas
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 02:55:25PM -0200, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: See http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick Going to take a look at that. Thanks! Why regexp? Indexed files are easier to understand and manage correctly, and even do "partial" lookup keys for you... You mean

Re: Setting default account for local users - sender_canonical_maps?

2020-07-02 Thread Silas
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:09:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: /etc/postfix/sender_canonical: /^root$/ notificat...@example.com That does not work, because the address is root@domain not root. That is it! After playing with the machine domain name, the $mydomain setting and ch

Setting default account for local users - sender_canonical_maps?

2020-07-02 Thread Silas
Hi all. Some local users (Unix accounts) on a machine are allowed to send emails externally, but I want some other users (mainly administrativa accounts like root and others) to use a notificat...@example.com account. I can make that by passing "-f notificat...@example.com" to sendmail, but

Re: LMTP not working

2019-04-16 Thread Silas
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:14:42AM -0300, Silas wrote: Hi! I'm trying to setup Postfix + Dovecot for virtual user delivery via LMTP. Configuration seems fine (output of postconf -nf below) but I still get "User unknown in local recipient table". Details follow: [snip]

LMTP not working

2019-04-16 Thread Silas
Hi! I'm trying to setup Postfix + Dovecot for virtual user delivery via LMTP. Configuration seems fine (output of postconf -nf below) but I still get "User unknown in local recipient table". Details follow: Apr 15 20:08:09 example postfix/smtpd[7817]: Anonymous TLS connection established

Re: postfix benchmark performance

2009-02-11 Thread Silas Boyd-Wickizer
un more virtuals to increase concurrency? I'm not sure what you mean by "waiting for kernel system calls to complete". Do you mean "executing kernel system calls" (reading from a pipe), or "blocked on kernel system calls" (i.e. waiting on a pipe)? Thanks. Silas

Re: postfix benchmark performance

2009-02-11 Thread Silas Boyd-Wickizer
igured because postfix only utilizes 10% of available cycles. I realize this is a synthetic/contrived/silly "benchmark" and a little outside the scope of what is normally discussed on this list..but I would still like to know why postfix uses 10% of available cycles. Silas

postfix benchmark performance

2009-02-11 Thread Silas Boyd-Wickizer
>Feb 11 12:34:33 postfix/qmg"..., 66, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 66 <0.14> 12:34:33.140443 stat("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1267, ...}) = 0 <0.000007> 12:34:33.140506 stat("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1267, ...}) = 0 <0.07> 12:34:33.140566 stat("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1267, ...}) = 0 <0.08> 12:34:33.140631 sendto(7, "<134>Feb 11 12:34:33 postfix/qmg"..., 74, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 74 <0.11> 12:34:33.140682 lstat("incoming/2301623929FB", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0700, st_size=10797, ...}) = 0 <0.10> 12:34:33.140743 rename("incoming/2301623929FB", "active/2301623929FB") = 0 <0.13> Silas