2 client machines connect via telnet to postfix smtp server on port 25.
All machines are on the same subnet. One machine gets helo
instantaneously. The other it takes roughly 20-30 secs. I had similar
problem in the past where dns reverse resolution was problem. However,
here there is reverse r
Below, is my postfix alias configuration.
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-groups.cf
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mail.cf
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-nonmail.cf
ldap:/etc/postfix/l
Ah... excellent.
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/13/2014 11:03 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> I am using this parameter to send message to be filtered by dspam.
>> However, I want local email to bypass dspam and go directly to mail
>> box serv
I am using this parameter to send message to be filtered by dspam.
However, I want local email to bypass dspam and go directly to mail
box server over lmtp.
I am not sure why the pcre code below doesn't work for local email.
/^192\.168\.0.\d{1,3}$/ lmtp:[192.168.0.246]:24
/./ FILTER dspam:dsp
.2013 03:12, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> Supposedly, the recipients are getting their emails from other
>> senders. However, when sending email from postfix, I get mx
>> malformed bounce.
>>
>> I did a dig on mx record for that domain and got...
>>
>>
gt; On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:12:27PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> Supposedly, the recipients are getting their emails from other
>> senders. However, when sending email from postfix, I get mx
>> malformed bounce.
>>
>> I did a dig on mx record for that domain
Supposedly, the recipients are getting their emails from other
senders. However, when sending email from postfix, I get mx
malformed bounce.
I did a dig on mx record for that domain and got...
enlglobal.com. 300 IN MX 0 .
Is this legit? If yes, what is the mail server?
sorry for the bother. it's inet_interfaces.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I have created a virtual ip on the loopback interface. How do I make
> postfix listen on that interface?
>
> ifconfig
> --
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
I have created a virtual ip on the loopback interface. How do I make
postfix listen on that interface?
ifconfig
--
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0c:29:89:ed:18
inet addr:192.168.0.244 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
telnet 192.168.0.244 25 or telnet 192.168.0.245 25 from a
workstation on lan or from 192.168.0.249, it works.
Any help is appreciated.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:56 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:34:45AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> I have created the following
I have created the following smtp load balancing setup
lb1 (keepalived server) host mx... ip .249
||
||
||
|| ||
Wouldn't the server be chosen round robin as opposed to random?
From: Wietse Venema
Sent: 11/7/2013 8:21 PM
To: Postfix users
Cc: postfix users list; u...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: Multiple outgoing smtp servers
Roman Gelfand:
> I am looking to load balance and distribute outgoing loa
I am looking to load balance and distribute outgoing load.
I read that all you need to do is add the following dns entries for
each postfix box..
mxr IN A 192.168.1.121
mxr IN A 192.168.1.131
mxr IN A 192.168.1.141
mxr IN A 192.168.1.151
mxr IN A 192.168.1.161
and the following line in main.cf
Is there a limit on a number of connections or number of emails could
be sent from an ip?
The reason why I am asking is... There is this workstation which is
able to connect to other ports of the postfix server and, at the same
time, other workstations could connect to postfixes smtp port.
Any he
Thanks... the issue was, in fact, in resolv.conf.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
>> there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
>> Is this
Looking at the tcp stream, below, of a smtp conversation, it appears
there is 5 second delay before the actual smtp conversation begins.
Is this normal behavior. If not, any ideas what/where specifically,
in networking, I should be troubleshooting? No change was done to the
server or any other ma
1si12576362qeb.75 - gsmtp)
Oct 29 16:57:10 pmx1 postfix/qmgr[2892]: EF7454059D: removed
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:13 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> Am 29.10.2013 22:08, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> Sorry about that one. In fact, the other address was unreachable
>> than. Pleas
, delay=31,
delays=0.02/0/30/0.55, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1383080173
nl1si12576362qeb.75 - gsmtp)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:02 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2013 21:55, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
>> Am 29.10.2013 21:46, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>>> Ho
How did you decide this is a network issue?
How would you go about determining which router which switch?
Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:33 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2013 21:25, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> The client is thunderbird. Correct me if
The client is thunderbird. Correct me if I am wrong, it appears it 40
seconds for the client to hand over the email to the server? If so,
where should I troubleshoot? are there maintenance
tasks/configuration changes to improve this situation.
BTW... from the inception there was no or negligibl
sorry about this. I guess it has nothing to do with mx records. It
is the remote server telling me their server is not able to accept
mail.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> but I am geting the following message
>
> said: 451 Temporary local problem - please
/12/2013 10:19 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> Looking through the logs, I have noticed an attempt to send out mail
>> which temporary local fails. I did a dig mx and noticed there is no
>> mx record. I then tried to connect to the email address domain
>> portion of the name.
Looking through the logs, I have noticed an attempt to send out mail
which temporary local fails. I did a dig mx and noticed there is no
mx record. I then tried to connect to the email address domain
portion of the name. Sure enough, I was able to connect.
Is this legitimate configuration of ma
This is a manual solution. Is there an automatic solution where based
on the log a transport file or database is maintained... something
that has smarts to automatically deal with 550's?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> If outgoing emai
If outgoing email bounced with 550,I would like, if not forever, for a
while, to bounce emails to that address locally. Is there a way to do
that?
Thanks in advance
stfix/smtp[30325]: 0208544124:
to=,
relay=retail-smtp-in.amazon.com[176.32.98.133]:25, delay=0.26,
delays=0/0/0.1/0.15, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
52D9D9EC1AE)
Sep 12 10:38:50 mail1 postfix/qmgr[3632]: 0208544124: removed
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roma
[192.168.0.86]
as it could to take some to time to attempt resolve this dns. Is this
correct?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:59AM -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> We have a program which every so often sends a request, using ch
We have a program which every so often sends a request, using chilkat,
to postfix to send out email with attachment. With every send it has
to connect to postfix using sasl authentication. Each send appears to
take a long time. In the absence of more detailed information, I am
guessing the conne
In case, of hard bounce, does this include mx record not being found
but domain name exist?
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> It appears that by default if target domain can't be dns resolved,
>> there is a local hard bounce.
>
&g
x.org
Subject: Re: ISP has no reverse DNS for ip address
On 09/02/2013 12:11 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/1/2013 6:57 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> On every machine, at different locations, I have tried "dig -x ip
>> address" and it works correctly.
>>
>> I
You could assume this server will never be used as incoming server.
From: LuKreme
Sent: 9/1/2013 8:05 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org postfix
Subject: Re: HELO
On 01 Sep 2013, at 15:35 , Noel Jones wrote:
> If you want your HELO to be consistent regardless of which IP is
> used, use a separate ho
On every machine, at different locations, I have tried "dig -x ip
address" and it works correctly.
I have 4 messages stuck in a queue which are complaining about the
very thing that works.
refused to talk to me: 451 Sender's ISP has no reverse DNS for ip address
Can somebody tell me what is goi
:12:28PM -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> host ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com[74.125.136.27] said: 450-4.2.1 The user
>> you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that 450-4.2.1
>> prevents additional messages from being delivered
>
> The user is receiving too much mai
My mail server is now bound to a public ip A. The PTR resolves fine
here. When ISP from public ip A becomes unavailable, the firewall
over to a different provider. Naturally, the mail server will now be
bound to a public ip B. What do I do if I want correct PTR querry
response?
Thanks in advan
I am not sure I understand this. Isn't every message a separate connection?
If what it means to say is I have exceeded a quota for sending out
emails per time period, what is there to do about it?
Thanks in advance
I am getting the message below when trying to send out mail. I just
wanted to confirm this doesn't have to do with me. Correct me if I am
wrong, it is the target mailbox gmail is not happy about and not me.
host ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com[74.125.136.27] said: 450-4.2.1 The user
you are trying to c
Is there a way to add more info to "status=bounced" entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
Aug 25 11:40:27 mail postfix/smtp[22413]: 83A7643CEB:
to=, relay=mxserver.domain.com[XX.XX.XX.XXX]:25,
delay=0.57, delays=0/0/0.41/0.16, dsn=5.0.0, status=bo
You are right. Stupid me. I just realized, I don't want to do this.
Please, ignore.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.08.2013 14:29, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> How can I disable postfix from sending administrator email
>>
How can I disable postfix from sending administrator email
notifications. ie from: r...@domain.com to: r...@domain.com?
Thanks in advance
Thanks a lot. Exactly what I was looking for.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Drizzt wrote:
>> When an outgoing email's target address is prefixed by '+', I would
>> like postfix to delete it replying back to the client ok status.
>>
>> I had previously setup below. But this sends back to the
When an outgoing email's target address is prefixed by '+', I would
like postfix to delete it replying back to the client ok status.
I had previously setup below. But this sends back to the client 554.
I would like the client to think that in this situation everything is
fine.
main.cf
smtpd_rec
it gives configuration error.
Actually, I see what I needed to do.
In the pcre file, I should have added all other emails permit and in
main.cf add reject line
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/21/2013 9:58 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> For the outgoing email
For the outgoing emails, why is the configuration below not enough to:
1. Block +a...@domain.com
2. Allow all other emails
main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_access.pcre
/etc/postfix/recipient_access.pcre
/\+(,*)/reje
plan it. I inherited it. Though there are very few of these
occurrences, I am concerned now that we may get blacklisted for
something like this.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:31:20PM -0400, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>>
We are running an application which pulls mail from yahoo pop3 server
and ultimately resends it, via local postfix server, keeping the same
from and to addresses. The way I see it, there are rare instances
where from domain requires strict dkim enforcement. As a result,
yahoo rejects it notifyin
excellent.. thank you
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> Is there a way to blacklist outbound email which was previously hard-bounced?
>>
>> For instance, if outgoing email comes back with codes 550 or 554, I
>> would like
The same recepient
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> Is there a way to blacklist outbound email which was previously hard-bounced?
>>
>> For instance, if outgoing email comes back with codes 550 or 554, I
>> would like that on
Is there a way to blacklist outbound email which was previously hard-bounced?
For instance, if outgoing email comes back with codes 550 or 554, I
would like that on subsequent times it doesn't leave the server.
Thanks in advance
My postfix server is configured as outbound gateway only. The mail
store is housed by yahoo. Often, I need to send email from a remote
mail address to yahoo address that belongs to me. It appears that
sometimes yahoo rejects this email and postfix attempts to send NDR to
the from address. Some
The logwatch does exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks a lot
From: Stan Hoeppner
Sent: 7/25/2013 5:52 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Mail Bounces
On 7/25/2013 11:53 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I am using postfix as outgoing mail gateway. Outside of non-delivery
> notificati
I am using postfix as outgoing mail gateway. Outside of non-delivery
notification, is there a way to produce a report of email addresses
and the reason for the bounce of all emails, that were, in conclusion,
rejected.
Thanks in advance
Would any have or could point me to a postfix outbound mail trottling
configuration based on email provider. For instance, to Yahoo I would
like to send out only 10 emails per hour and to gmail 100 emails per
hour, etc...
Thanks in advance
It appears that this message is a way that
the target server responds to email not found.
Thanks for everyone's help on this.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> I am sorry. I posted this only to Stan before. Looking at the
>> reject
would you have more info on this, as far as, how to go about researching this?
Thanks again
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> I am sorry. I posted this only to Stan before. Looking at the
>> rejected line, it seems to be postfix/s
ed
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Roman Gelfand:
>> I am trying to send out a message my server and getting an error below
>> from my server
>> 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (in reply to RCPT TO command))
>
> That is qmail, not Postfix.
>
> Wietse
I am trying to send out a message my server and getting an error below
from my server
550 #5.1.0 Address rejected. (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Is it this server that is rejecting this email or target server? Why?
Thanks in advance
Is there open source web based postfix server monitoring software?
I am looking to see if there is something to monitor queue size, etc...
Thanks in advance
What setting determines how long postfix should attempt to deliver an
email if target server is not available?
Will this setting work with smart host configuration where smart host
is temporarily unavailable?
Thanks in advance
I have the following smtpd entry in master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=lmtp:unix:/tmp/dspam.sock
-o relay_recipient_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients
What settings would I need to add to requre authentication for
outbou
Is it a problem if I enforce tls from master.cf?
Everything else, I have in place. I suppose, I could rate limit from
the same ip, password attempts, etc...
Thanks again
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 11:31 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>&g
dovecot.
4) for outbound email, the user agents should use mail gateway.
Please, let me know if this is what you meant.
Thanks again
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 04:09 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>> Consider the following config...
>&g
I found the problem. I was missing virtual_mailbox_domains.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> My topology is as follows..
>
> 1. Postfix mail gateway which ultimately invokes dspam content filter
> which relays the email to backend mailbox server.
>
My topology is as follows..
1. Postfix mail gateway which ultimately invokes dspam content filter
which relays the email to backend mailbox server.
2. The backend mailbox server runs both postfix and dovecot.
It appears it tried to send email to itself. As per configuration
below, a dovecot de
Serves as a "conveyor" for various email associated servers?
From: Jeroen Geilman
Sent: 10/23/2012 1:38 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Email Server Topology
On 10/23/2012 07:07 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Can a postscript server work with mail box server like dovec
12525
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:31 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2012 21:56:43 Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> I see there is a way to whitelist domain.
>
> Numerous ways, depending on what you mean by "domain".
>
>> Is it possible to whitelist sender email
I see there is a way to whitelist domain. Is it possible to whitelist
sender email address? Also, if I am running several filters, will
postfix automatically disable filtering for this sender email address?
Thanks in advance
Actually, I think it was inserted by yahoo, where I sent this email.
That being said, I thought it was sent by postfix to yaho in ehlo
conversation.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/27/2010 5:18 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>> It appears smtp is advert
It appears smtp is advertising localhost (127.0.0.1) as in Received:
from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail.mydomain.com).
If this is so, can it be changed to the actual wan ip?
Thanks in advance
You are right on the money. I made the change and it works now.
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/27/2010 4:14 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to strip some lines from outgoing mail header. It doesn't
>> work for me. I a
I am trying to strip some lines from outgoing mail header. It doesn't
work for me. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.
master.cf
-o header_checks=pcre:header_checks.pcre
header_checks.pcre
/^(.*Received.*192\.168\.12\.7.*)/ IGNORE
when I run
postmap -q - 'Received: from exch.dom.loc
I have one last question. Since postfix's header information is most
meaningful, is there a setting that would allow me to strip all the
previous header info (in this case exchange's)?
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/25
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
>> I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
>> is on internal edge of the dmz.
>
> Bah, you did mention the Exchange server and I just missed i
well. I
suppose the right thing to do here will be to use 10225.
Thanks for your help.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/24/2010 10:45 AM:
>> I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
>> is on internal
I neglected to mention the exchange server, source outbound server,
is on internal edge of the dmz.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Roman Gelfand put forth on 12/23/2010 10:01 PM:
>
>> I am now looking to use the postfix mail gateway, smart host,
>>
I am using postfix server as an smtp gateway to exchange server. I
have configured a series of services and filters with postfix. One of
antispam daemons is dspam, content filter. I have configured it to
replace smtp server. Once an email is inspected, it is reinjected for
delivery. I am now
If found the issue. The from address was bad.
Thanks for help.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:06 PM, mouss wrote:
>> Le 23/12/2010 19:50, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
>>> I am encountering trouble sending outbound email (connec
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:06 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 23/12/2010 19:50, Roman Gelfand a écrit :
>> I am encountering trouble sending outbound email (connection time
>> outs). Is there a way I could see mail header contents without
>> connecting to the target server to send out
I am encountering trouble sending outbound email (connection time
outs). Is there a way I could see mail header contents without
connecting to the target server to send out the email?
Thanks in advance
Yes, in fact, I ended up using it.
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 21.12.2010 23:11, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
>> Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
>> sender reputation query results to message header.
Actually, I am using dspam for content filter. I was looking to add
sender reputation query results to message header. As it turns out
opendkim did the trick.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 21/12/2010 19:44, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>>
>> Roman Gelfa
Does anyone know of a server/software compatible with postfix that
performs sender reputation query?
Thanks in advance
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:40:29 -0500
>> Von: Roman Gelfand
>> An: Steve
>> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
>
>> Well, it
inal-Nachricht
>> >> Datum: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:37:18 +0100
>> >> Von: mouss
>> >> An: postfix users list
>> >> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
>> >
>> >> Roman Gelfand a écrit :
>> >>> I am running p
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:50:26 -0500
>> Von: Roman Gelfand
>> An: Steve
>> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
>
>>
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:02:32AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
>> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
>> dow
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:02:32 -0500
>> Von: Roman Gelfand
>> An: postfix users list
>> Betreff: anti spam measures
>
>> I am running postfix with anti spam fil
I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
down to under 10 spams a day. Looking at my backend server which is
exchange 2007, I find that all of the remaining spam messages have
spam confidence level o
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
>
>> Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
>
> Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your firewall. It will
> also obviously need PTR, A, and MX records.
>
> Also, this may be
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
wrote:
> * Roman Gelfand :
>
>> Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
>> address as opposed NATed address?
>
> That depends on what you want to use it for
>
I want to use it to filter spam
Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
address as opposed NATed address?
It appeas that as postfix handing control to various plugins, the
source address of the message is 127.0.0.1. Is there a configuration
in postfix that would ignore the localhost and show original s
Please, correct where I am wrong.
Looking at man sid-filter, with -d flag, you can supply domains to be
ignored by the filter.
I am assuming by domain, it means to the right of @.
Does sid-filter ignore entries in the header where reference to the
domain is mentioned or the whole email is not f
I am running senderid milter. The problem I am facing is that it looks
at the previous hop, which is ip 127.0.0.1. Is it possible to control
where postfix does it' miltering?
Anyhelp is appreciated
Thanks in advance
Would you mind sending me the postfix (ie.. main.cf master) sid-filter
cinfiguration. Also, if you have sid-filter startup shutdown script,
that would be great also.
Thanks
Sorry about that. I was missing libmilter devel files and a couple of
more items All is fixed.
Thanks
K.. it looks like I screwed up. I was not using sid-milter. Now, I
am in the middle of sid-milter install and found myself missing
libmilter header files.
fyi.. I am using debian lenny.
Would you know where I could grab these header files?
Thanks again
version?
Thanks again
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:05 AM, fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
> Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 09:49, Sahil Tandon a écrit :
>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> > Could somebody recommend software that filters based on sender id
>> > reputa
Could somebody recommend software that filters based on sender id
reputation. I am refering to the sender id that microsoft uses as
opposed to SPF.
Thanks in advance
How does roundcube compare with exchange outlook web access?
Can somebody recommend a mail box server software that would be worthy
of postfix?
Also, if anyone knows of a cool web client.
Thanks in advance
This is excellent. If you have other non-content spam filtering suggestion,
I would greatly appreciate it.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> It looks like somebody is trying to figure out my internal users as
>> evidenced by log e
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
