RE: TLS handshake failed

Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:11:26AM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have > > tried to send a message to > > ,: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: &q

RE: TLS handshake failed

Hello, > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:47 PM > To: Postfix users > Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed > > Rocco Scappatura: >

RE: TLS handshake failed

Thanks, > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:43 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed > > On 7/

TLS handshake failed

Hello, a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have tried to send a message to ,: - Original Message - From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:52 AM Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours > *

RE: sender_bcc_maps and performance

Thanks Victor, > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have enabled "sender_bcc_maps" in my main.cf. The lookup file has > just > > 2 entries. > > What fraction of your traffic is se

sender_bcc_maps and performance

Hello, I have enabled "sender_bcc_maps" in my main.cf. The lookup file has just 2 entries. I have noticed that the number of message in active queue grews as soon as I enable this feature. Is it so expensive? I otherwise can't figure out why active queues grows. Infact, I have verified that no c

RE: Cryptic message for end users

Wietse, > > Ok Ralph, I have solved the two holes in conf file of Maildrop. Now I > get the following over quota message: > > > > < posta.sttspa.it #5.7.0 x-unix; maildrop: maildir over > quota.> > > > > Which is still not completely 'human-readble'. > > The error message is produced

RE: Cryptic message for end users

Hello, > Error 1: maildirmake: /pathto/user/: File exists > Error 2: maildrop: maildir over quota. > > > What you mean precisely? How I can find the mistake? > > > > Here my maildrop conf file: > > > > log "test -d $HOME$DEFAULT" > > `test -d $HOME$DEFAULT` > > if ($RETURNCODE != 0) > > { > >

RE: Cryptic message for end users

Thanks Ralph, > * Rocco Scappatura : > > Error 1: maildirmake: /pathto/user/: File exists > Error 2: maildrop: maildir over quota. > > > What you mean precisely? How I can find the mistake? > > > > Here my maildrop conf file: > > > > log "

RE: Cryptic message for end users

Thanks Ralph, > > I have a postoffice system based on > > Postfix+MySQL+Courier-IMAP+Courier-authlib+Maildrop. > > > > I have enable quota checking with maildrop. > > > > When quota is overcame then Postfix get a permanent error by maildrop > > and generates a bounce with the following information

Cryptic message for end users

Hello, I have a postoffice system based on Postfix+MySQL+Courier-IMAP+Courier-authlib+Maildrop. I have enable quota checking with maildrop. When quota is overcame then Postfix get a permanent error by maildrop and generates a bounce with the following informations: The message is 'as-is' repo

RE: private/hash

y 08, 2009 at 17:45 CEST, > Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > > > And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out > > > significant portions of the log, so definitive help is not > possible. > > > > May 8 17:16:50 av3 postfix/local[3419]: fatal: conne

RE: private/hash

Sorry, > On Fri May 8 2009 10:20:22 Rocco Scappatura wrote: > > I get: > > > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > > directory > > And which process gives you this warning? You snipped out significant > portions of the log, so defi

RE: private/hash

Hello, > Rocco Scappatura: > > Hello, > > > > I get: > > > > warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or > directory > > You have configured a hash: LOOKUP TABLE where Postfix expects a > SERVICE NAME (such as a content filter or p

RE: private/hash

> -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hayes > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 5:22 PM > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: private/hash > > Rocco Scappatura wrote:

private/hash

Hello, I get: warning: connect #3 to subsystem private/hash: No such file or directory In main.cf I set: virtual_alias_domains = domain.tld virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual while in /etc/postfix/virtual kubasms@ domain.tld autogerma@ domain2.tld kubasms-notifiche@ doma

RE: Redirect messages for just one recipient

Thanks Barney, thanks Noel, All works fine. Bye, rocsva > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Barney Desmond > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:38 AM > To: postfix users list > Subject: Re: Redirect messages

Redirect messages for just one recipient

Hello, I have a Postfix-based system which consist of a front end side (mail gateway) and a post office side. I receive messages for different domain. Every message destined for a domain, say "domain.tld", is forwarded to the post office and there the recipient will eventually be translated and d

RE: Separating relay control from other checks

Viktor, > > > > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > > > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" > > > > > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and > > may > > > never be) implemented. > > > > :-( > > > > What a shame! I think

RE: Separating relay control from other checks

> > A further question: "How I say to postfix to use > > 'smtpd_rcpt_restriction_classes' and where it will be evaluated?" > > You can't. This is a hypothetical feature. It has not yet been (and may > never be) implemented. :-( What a shame! I think that it could be very nice.. rocsca

Separating relay control from other checks

Hello, I felt interesting the discussion started by mouss in thread "whitelist from spamhaus", and particularly the content of the email: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2006-05/0598.html written by Viktor. Indeed, I have started since some weeks to use the Postfix SMTP polic

RE: relayhost

Noel, > > I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses > Postfix > > as MTA. > > > > On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to > transmit > > messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the > > messages. In particular, it looks up DNS f

relayhost

Hello, I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix as MTA. On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the messages. In particular, it looks up DNS for MX of destination domai

RE: Postoffice with virtual mailbox and a Maildrop issue [SOLVED]

Hello, > > Rocco Scappatura a écrit : > > > [snip] > > > Why the message is not delivered immediately to the virtual mailbox > > after > > > vacation filter? > > > > > > > because the domain is not listed as a virtual mailbox domain >

RE: Postoffice with virtual mailbox and a Maildrop issue

Thanks mouss, > Rocco Scappatura a écrit : > > [snip] > > Why the message is not delivered immediately to the virtual mailbox > after > > vacation filter? > > > > because the domain is not listed as a virtual mailbox domain At first glance, I shoud say as a

Re: Postoffice with virtual mailbox and a Maildrop issue

Thanks Magnus, >> append_at_myorigin = no deleted. >> I have the problem that mail destined to local virtual mailbox is not >> delivered locally, even if all looks up succesfully confirm tha the >> message have to be delivered locally: > > So what does happen to the messages? At the moment, I'm

Postoffice with virtual mailbox and a Maildrop issue

Hello, I'm setting up a postoffice platform based on Postfix+Courier-authlib-Courier-IMAP-Maildrop. Here my postfix parameters: # postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases append_at_myorigin = no append_dot_mydomain = no bounce_size_limit = 1 c

RE: policy service question

Thanks Sahil for your precious answer, > > I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway > > platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to > transmit > > messages. > > > > The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port. > > > > I have so set postfix the use p

policy service question

Hello, I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to transmit messages. The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port. I have so set postfix the use policy service at the and of recipient restriction and at th

RE: Policy for outgoing messages

Thanks Peter, > > My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages > > (including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a > group > > which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my mail server. > > smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service inet:foo:12

Policy for outgoing messages

Hello, I have a number of networks from which is possible to use my mail gateway system (Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL) to relay email messages (directly through a mail client or through another MTA that uses my mail gateway system as smart host). The mail gateway system moreover is used as MX record

Re: SMTP relay only

Victor, >> > Finally I would like to deny message delivery to my mail server.. It >> > should suffice to unset "relay_domains" or it is too restrictive doing >> > so? >> > >> >> to disable "local" delivery, check the FIREWALL README. > > I think this means: > > http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_

Re: SMTP relay only

> Rocco Scappatura a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I need to setup a mail server for outgoing email only. I clearly would >> like to restrict access to my networks only. >> >> Moreover, I would like to permit only to some envelope senders to relay >> em

Re: SMTP relay only

Hello. > I need to setup a mail server for outgoing email only. I clearly would > like to restrict access to my networks only. > > Moreover, I would like to permit only to some envelope senders to relay > email trhough a such MTA. And no other envelope sender should be able to > relay trhough thi

SMTP relay only

Hello, I need to setup a mail server for outgoing email only. I clearly would like to restrict access to my networks only. Moreover, I would like to permit only to some envelope senders to relay email trhough a such MTA. And no other envelope sender should be able to relay trhough this MTA. So t

RE: Timing question

Sorry for the delay.. > > >> >> Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the > time > > >> >> before > > >> >> a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is processed > by > > >> the > > >> >> content filter? > > >> > > > >> > The time to deliver is measured as the time be

DSN on deferring

Hello, When I send a message to an inexistent email address and the receiving MTA is down, like the following example: av4 mail16:46:22postfix/smtppostfix/smtp[27440]: 11BD7750296: to=, relay=none, delay=10, delays=0.03/0/10/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx1.destdo

Re: SMTP sessions

Thanks Viktor, >> 1) Once a client (or another MTA) establish a TCP connection with >> listening port bounded by the SMTP daemon of Postfix, could happen that >> more then one email messages are sent over that TCP connection, before >> it >> is closed? > > Sure this is possible, but it is unlik

Re: SMTP sessions

Victor, >> >> I fear that the problem is that for each session I can have an >> unsettled >> >> number of messages sent over that session (It could be happen? If >> yes, >> >> It could be depend on MTA settings?) other then an unsettled size of >> >> SMTP traffic (which it determs the latency of

RE: SMTP sessions

Hi, >>> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several >>> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. >>> > >>> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions >>> that >>> > every server has to manage. >>> >>> New connections are given to the ser

Re: check_client_access

Mouss, > How do I have to modify it so that I could block an email address > either > if is the sender or one of the recipients, AND either if the message > is > incoming or outgoing? > > Maybe so (assuming that the action will never be "OK")... > > smtpd_client

Re: check_client_access

Sorry, >>> How do I have to modify it so that I could block an email address >>> either >>> if is the sender or one of the recipients, AND either if the message is >>> incoming or outgoing? >>> >>> Maybe so (assuming that the action will never be "OK")... >>> >>> smtpd_client_restrictions = >>>

Re: check_client_access

>> How do I have to modify it so that I could block an email address either >> if is the sender or one of the recipients, AND either if the message is >> incoming or outgoing? >> >> Maybe so (assuming that the action will never be "OK")... >> >> smtpd_client_restrictions = >> check_client_acces

Re: check_client_access

Mouss, >>> and your explanation was about a "receiver". That's 3 different >>> things... >> >> So.. What I have to do to block a message based on the receiver? >> > > check_recipient_access. > >>> PS. it would be safer to put your check_sender_access in >>> smtpd_sender_restrictions so that an

RE: SMTP sessions

Hello, >> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several >> > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. >> > >> > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions >> that >> > every server has to manage. >> >> New connections are given to the server wit

Re: check_client_access

Mouss, >> [snip] >> >> :-D >> >> [snip] > > dogs ate logs? > Very cool from you.. as usual! You have won a prize.. :-) <-- Is it ok so? ;-) > - show logs that prove what you claimed Feb 1 06:02:50 av5 postfix/smtpd[32172]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[83.103.67.197]: 550 5.1.1 to= p

Re: check_client_access

Thanks, >> In smtpd_recipient_restrictions I put as first line: >> >> check_sender_access >> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-check-sender-access.cf >> >> The check looks up the database for an address or a domain ad returns an >> action (OK, REJECT, and so on). > > This sounds bad; you should

Re: Timing question

Wietse, >> >> Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the time >> >> before >> >> a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is processed by >> the >> >> content filter? >> > >> > The time to deliver is measured as the time between MAIL FROM and >> > "end-of-data". >> >>

Re: Timing question

>> >> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> >> >> cntent >> >> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> >> >> >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> >> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, >> >> delay=8.9, >> >> >> dela

check_client_access

In smtpd_recipient_restrictions I put as first line: check_sender_access proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-check-sender-access.cf The check looks up the database for an address or a domain ad returns an action (OK, REJECT, and so on). Last day my server receives a lot of messages for an email

Recipient verification from post-office in down stream issue

Hello, My postfix server i configured to reject unverified server for a domain "recipient.tld". The record MX for this domain points to my server. When my MTA receive messages for "recipient.tld", then the messages are forwarded to the server with IP 10.30.32.7. In main.cf I have. smtpd_recipien

Re: Timing question

Thanks Wietse and Victor, >> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> >> cntent >> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, >> delay=8.9, >> >

Re: Timing question

Thanks Wietse, >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the >> cntent >> filer and to postfix without conten filter): >> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23: >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9, >> delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, statu

Re: Timing question

> I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system. > > I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter > of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be > processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the > filter). > > I "

Timing question

Hello. I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system. I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the filter). I "grep"

RE: SMTP sessions

> > I have a mail gateway system that consists of several > > Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. > > > > I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions > that > > every server has to manage. > > New connections are given to the server with the fewest con

SMTP sessions

Hello. I have a mail gateway system that consists of several Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new machines behind a load balancer. I have defined a balancing policy based on number of SMTP sessions that every server has to manage. But, even if the session is perfectly balanced, I see that the average laten

RE: Share postfix config directory

> > > > I have different SMTP gateways each one configurred exactly at > the > > > same > > > > manner. The only difference is the hostname. > > > > > > > > I would like to know if I could define "/etc/postfix" as an NFS > > share > > > > somewhere and export it on each of my SMTP gateways. The aim

RE: Share postfix config directory

: Thomas [mailto:t...@tja-server.de] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:58 AM To: Rocco Scappatura Cc: postfix users list Subject: Re: Share postfix config directory I never had a problem to do exactly this ... For what do you need the hostname of the server? My main.cf does not contain a

RE: Share postfix config directory

> > I have different SMTP gateways each one configurred exactly at the > same > > manner. The only difference is the hostname. > > > > I would like to know if I could define "/etc/postfix" as an NFS share > > somewhere and export it on each of my SMTP gateways. The aim is > > obviously to change on

Share postfix config directory

Hello, I have different SMTP gateways each one configurred exactly at the same manner. The only difference is the hostname. I would like to know if I could define "/etc/postfix" as an NFS share somewhere and export it on each of my SMTP gateways. The aim is obviously to change only one configurat

RE: User unknown in relay recipient table (SOLVED)

> Rocco Scappatura a écrit : > >>> Dec 12 16:55:33 av1 postfix/smtpd[25586]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from > >>> unknown[]: 550 5.1.1 > >>> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in > >> relay > >>> recipient table; from= to=<

RE: User unknown in relay recipient table

> > Dec 12 16:55:33 av1 postfix/smtpd[25586]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > > unknown[]: 550 5.1.1 > > : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in > relay > > recipient table; from= to=< u...@extdomain.tld> > > proto=ESMTP helo= > > The error message indicates you have defined > relay_recipient_m

User unknown in relay recipient table

Hello, I have a Postfix MTA which is configured to check recipients for a domain listed in table "relay_domains", before to forward the message to the appropriate post office. All has worked fine, until the MTA has been configured as backup MX for an external domain, say "extdomain.tld". Since t

Avoiding spam scan for a specific recipient

Hello, I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform. Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender an a particular client. In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put: smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_senders from_policy_bank_senders = check_sender_acce

RE: Postfix and quota clarification

> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:49 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit : > > > >>> However, Postfix supports access maps that can reject mail for > >>> over-quota users, if you are willing to periodically add up all > >>> the mail each user has. > >> > >> I ha

Postfix and quota clarification

Hello, I have a post-office platform based on Postfix-2.5.2+Courier-IMAP-4.0.1-Courier-authlib-0.53+MySQL-5.0.33. Can someone give some hint on how enable (and verify that works) quota on mailboxes? Thanks, rocsca

RE: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours > > ago (full context is below the signature): > > > > 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 > 217.11.85.59.2528: . ack > > 1998901 win 32767 (DF) > > > > What happens is that the receiver (80.74.176.142) says: > > > > I ha

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

> Rocco Scappatura: >> > > > I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a >> > > > workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. >> > > > >> > > > Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I receive

RE: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > > I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a > > > workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. > > > > > > Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours > > > ago (full context is below the signature): > > > > > > 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 > 21

RE: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

> I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a > workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. > > Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours > ago (full context is below the signature): > > 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 > 217.11.85.59.2528: . ack >

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > > Which tcpdump version is this? Where are the time stamps and the > > > packets with data (Len>0)? > > > > tcpdump show only initial packet data by default and "-s0" show all > > data. Is usefull when decode HEX (-xX) or ASCII (-A) > > I repeat, there is no need to look at the data itself.

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > Rocco Scappatura: > > > 12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 > server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360) > > ack > > > 358 win 65178 (DF) > > > > Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options. > > You are right, there is no TCP opti

RE: authentication failed

> > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN > > > authentication failed: authentication failure > > > > I do get those all the time. Users mistyping their passwords, > > usernames, client's getting AUTH all wrong and so on. > > OK. > > > > then > > > > > > postfix/sm

RE: authentication failed

> > postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN > > authentication failed: authentication failure > > I do get those all the time. Users mistyping their passwords, > usernames, client's getting AUTH all wrong and so on. OK. > > then > > > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: lost con

RE: authentication failed

> I'm facing a problem with a client that can't send email trough my mail > gateway.. > > After connection, in mail log, I get: > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN > authentication failed: authentication failure > > then > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: lost connect

RE: authentication failed

> I'm facing a problem with a client that can't send email trough my mail > gateway.. > > After connection, in mail log, I get: > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN > authentication failed: authentication failure > > then > > postfix/smtpd[19545]: lost connect

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> Rocco Scappatura: > > 12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 > server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360) > ack > > 358 win 65178 (DF) > > Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options. You are right, there is no TCP option. I will try to dump another SMTP ses

authentication failed

Hello, I'm facing a problem with a client that can't send email trough my mail gateway.. After connection, in mail log, I get: postfix/smtpd[19545]: warning: unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: authentication failure then postfix/smtpd[19545]: lost connection after AUT

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from > > unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] > > Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: 7B98D75008D: > > client=unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] > > Oct 29 10:34:25 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: timeout after DATA from > > unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] > > Oct 29 10:34:

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> > > I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through > my > > > Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client. > > > > Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with > size > > above 5-6 MB.. > > > > > From mail log, I saw: > > > > > > postfix/smtpd[1

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

> I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my > Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client. Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with size above 5-6 MB.. > From mail log, I saw: > > postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from unknown[xxx.yyy.w

SMTP transaction interrupted

Hello, I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client. >From mail log, I saw: postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] postfix/smtpd[16988]: 7B98D75008D: client=unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] postfix/cleanu

RE: Postfix statistics from log stored on RDBMS

I have hacked pflogsumm so that it could be read log from database used by PHP-syslog-ng. If someone is interested, I will make it public. rocsca > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocco Scappatura >

RE: Postfix statistics from log stored on RDBMS

> look http://code.google.com/p/php-syslog-ng/ OK, it is very nice even if it takes a long time to analyze very large database. Moreover, it not represents much information about mail log. I prefer a tool like pflogsumm so that it can run 'off time' and it cointains many other information that ar

RE: Postfix statistics from log stored on RDBMS

> -Original Message- > From: Robert Schetterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:06 PM > To: Rocco Scappatura > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: Postfix statistics from log stored on RDBMS > > Rocco Scappatura schrieb: &

Postfix statistics from log stored on RDBMS

Hello, I have several Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL mail gateways. I have configured syslog service on that machines to send logs to a centralized syslog server, which stores received logs on mysql DBMS. BTW, I lookup the logs using Php-Syslog-NG. Anyway, logs on each machine are stored also as usua

advanced mysql lookup

Hello, I would like to add further condition for delivery of email messages. In my main.cf I have this setting: virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-transport.cf where mysql-trasport.cf contains: select_field = domain where_field = domain additional_conditions = and active