On 12/12/24 09:00, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 02:40:29AM +0100, natan via Postfix-users wrote:
I upgrade from postfix-3.7.x to postfix-3.9.x (Almalinux and repo GT-plus)
and i get problem
Dec 11 23:58:31 smtp2 postfix/postmap[24258]: warning: dict_mysql:
m
On 11/14/24 15:13, Matt Saladna via Postfix-users wrote:
In situations where either a server has run out of storage, a btree
database can become corrupted. I see this evidenced in the following
manner, specifically "no cursor":
Removing the .db cache in /var/lib/postfix followed by a restart
On 9/29/24 17:38, Steve Matzura via Postfix-users wrote:
sudo hostname theglobalvoice.info
The bash prompt changes, but after the reboot, it reverted back to
TGV24. I'll take this up elsewhere, but I thought I'd explain why it is
the way you see it.
Have you considered putting the hostnam
On 9/5/24 16:35, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
We act on bug reports that a listed TLD merits
removal by testing to confirm substantial non-spam hitting our
contributor mailstreams. I don't believe we list any country code TLDs
on principle.
There are a few ccTLDs that I block completel
On 8/31/24 15:41, Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sat, 2024-08-31 at 15:33 -0400, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
wrote:
My conclusion is: The mail_version set by 3.9.0 is not what is
expected, but *this will only be a problem to you* if you have config
directives that you no
On 8/31/24 15:02, Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sun, 2024-09-01 at 04:41 +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
How did you get Postfix to believe its version is "3.9". There was
never such a release. Official Postfix release versions always have
a micro "patch level".
Don't know whether it's a Gentoo specific issue, but Postfix failed to
restart after update because the new lib directory was created as
/usr/lib64/postfix/3.9, not /usr/lib64/postfix/3.9.0.
--
Phil Stracchino
Fenian House Publishing
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landlin
On 5/24/24 06:51, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Authentication-Results list.sys4.de; dkim=pass header.d=junc.eu;
arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain
Record) header.from=junc.eu policy.dmarc=reject
where comes REJECT from ?
You might consider asking th
On 2/7/24 10:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
postscreen is great against bots, but fail2ban with firwall are still better
against abusers.
And once you get the "Aha!" insight into how its configuration works,
it's actually not difficult to set up.
--
Phil Stracchino
On 2/7/24 10:41, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
Good info.
This site sends nothing but junk. IN fact the domain is known for it.
I tried just rejecting the email address. But they just change it.
So I blocked the IP, they have several.
Have you considered blocking the *domain* with a 50x e
On 11/9/23 20:25, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
Agh. I've been looking at mail.log on the wrong machine ALL ALONG .
kill me now
This was my problem:
Nov 9 20:26:17 minbar postfix/virtual[3125]: fatal: configuration
error: virtual_mailbox_limit is smaller
Agh. I've been looking at mail.log on the wrong machine ALL ALONG .
kill me now
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: +1.603.293.8485
Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
___
Postfi
On 11/9/23 20:15, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
OK, I also:
* made /var/spool/mail/fenianhouse.com/ and below group-writeable to gid
2000
* added postfix to group 2000
* restarted postfix
but my test message is still sitting in the queue with nothing happening.
I also just manually
On 11/9/23 19:45, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
What probably-should-be-obvious thing am I missing?
Do I need to manually create /var/spool/mail/fenianhouse.com/ ?
Do I need to manually create
/var/spool/mail/fenianhouse.com/seanfenian/ ?
I believe so. When I've used vi
On 11/9/23 19:52, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
I have deliberately not included fenianhouse.com and seanfenian.com in
$mydestination on the mailserver. *Should* I? This is my first try at
setting up virtual mailbox domains, I don't doubt I've made mistakes.
Update: ye
On 11/9/23 19:05, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:50:20PM -0500, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
wrote:
virtual_mailbox_domains = seanfenian.com fenianhouse.com
virtual_mailbox_maps= lmdb:/etc/postfix/vmailbox
virtual:
seanfen...@fenianhouse.com
On 11/9/23 18:44, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2023-11-09 at 17:50:20 UTC-0500 (Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:50:20 -0500)
Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hey folks,
I'm trying (for the first time) to add two virtual domains for
publishing to my long-time-s
Hey folks,
I'm trying (for the first time) to add two virtual domains for
publishing to my long-time-stable postfix-3.8.2 installation.
DNS is good:
babylon5:alaric:~:2 $ host -t MX fenianhouse.com
fenianhouse.com mail is handled by 10 smtp.caerllewys.net.
babylon5:alaric:~:3 $ host -t MX sean
On 9/22/23 13:12, Paul Enlund via Postfix-users wrote:
Does anybody know of a working (production level) ARC capable milter
particularly for a Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS with postfix 3.6.4 ?
rspamd from 1.6 on has an ARC module.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
On 9/18/23 10:09, Curtis Maurand via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello list,
At least I think they're stupid questions.
I'm running Postfix with rspamd which is a milter. At what point in the
email conversation does the DKIM lookup happen? Does Postfix handle that
or am I asking on the wrong list a
On 8/22/23 15:14, Bruce Dubbs via Postfix-users wrote:
On 8/22/23 04:16, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Bruce Dubbs via Postfix-users:
I have built postfix-3.8.1 from source and want to use it only on the local
system.
That is, I really only want it to receive messages from application
On 5/10/23 02:40, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 8/05/23 00:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
After multiple such connnections, postscreen could theoretically
decide that the client is unlikely to ever connect to the primary
MX, but by then the client will likely already have given u
On 5/3/23 15:23, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Though perhaps this level of attention to phrasing is only applicable in
Talmud scholarship...
Hey, six thousand years of Talmudic scholarship can't all be wrong! :D
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
On 4/27/23 04:47, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Ken Peng via Postfix-users:
Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
If you suggest relying on rspamd only, and forgo postscreen, I have to
disagree. In my experience, postscreen has proven highl
On 4/17/23 22:19, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
I saw many peer MTA connecting me with this default HELO hostname:
localhost.localdomain.
is this a FQDN? is it valid?
No properly configured MTA should ever be advertising its identity as
localhost.localdomain. Assuming it is that literal str
On 4/10/23 10:00, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up opendkim on my postfix server:
I actually just recently *switched* from separate OpenDKIM, OpenDMARC,
and spf-engine to letting rspamd (which is actively maintained) handle
all of those. It's a simpler conf
On 3/15/23 10:36, Marvin Renich via Postfix-users wrote:
That technical issue aside, in this thread there have been two posters
who expressed a desire to keep the tags, one said get rid of it in
users, but keep it in announce (I don't understand his reasoning, I am
just reporting his stated prefe
On 3/11/23 19:04, pyh--- via Postfix-users wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to use an object storage system (like aws's S3) to store
message files? if this can be implemented we may have a more persistent
storage for email. AFAIK aws's S3 has three replicas for each file in
their system by defa
On 3/10/23 13:54, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users:
I don't need tags.
Seconded. Do we really need to cater for software that's unable to use
the "List-Id" headers? These are mailing lists for Postfix users and
devs, not for a knitting circle, so
On 3/10/23 11:13, Curtis Maurand via Postfix-users wrote:
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't
segfault (so far ;-)
I've been running rspamd for nearly a year and I've been very happy with
it. It's a huge im
On 3/9/23 18:41, Roger Klorese via Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse, as a non-native English-speaker: are you aware that “p-u” is a childish
declaration that something stinks?
But are we REALLY all eight years old?
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.or
On 3/8/23 17:44, Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users wrote:
OK, this is very useful information that's not obvious from the
documentation. I have taken a leap of faith and made the tiny handful
of Postfix configuration changes necessary to let Rspamd handle all of
DKIM, DMARC, SPF inste
On 3/8/23 16:02, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
Here some quick notes from my configuration (related to SPF/DKIM/DMARC checking,
i.e. when receiving e-mails):
SPF and DKIM are enabled by default, and at least I didn't need to have any
local config (which would go in local.d/{spf,dkim}.c
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so
far ;-)
I'm STILL t
On 3/7/23 15:28, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
"mailmary---" == mailmary--- via Postfix-users
writes:
Unfortunately I've seen this crash as well, its actually quite
frequent in my case and I'm using a newer version of OpenDMARC than
you:
# opendmarc -V
opendmarc: OpenDMARC Filter
35 matches
Mail list logo
