SUMMARY
* Scenario/repeatability:
- Typical default postfix configuration
- An alias is added, but with a typo.
- Incoming email is rejected as expected, "Recipient address
rejected: undeliverable address: unknown user: "address"
- Typo corrected. newaliases is used. Postfix can b
Thanks Matus And Wietse.. it seems hardcoded into the C source... so there is
nothing to do via conf parmenters.
Pete.
En sábado, 12 de junio de 2021 18:41:30 CEST, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
escribió:
>pete...@yahoo.com:
>> is there any Postfix configuration parameter to set
Hi all,
is there any Postfix configuration parameter to set the text Postfix shows to
the sender when Connection concurrency limit is exceeded ???
Currently the sender (192.168.3.7) receives this:
"421 4.7.0 labpot.local Error: too many connections from 192.168.3.7"
any way to change the
Hi curious if there are any plans for support for the proxy protocol v2?
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
Hi,
Currently my Postfix is realying emails from domains listed in $relay_domains
only when those emails come from IPs listed in $mynetworks.
Is it possible with postfix to split this? to allow relaying some domains only
when coming from IP 'A' and some other domains only when coming from IP 'B'
.. (in the Physical
server)
May this delay be due to the qmgr files movement from deferred to active
folders? that would be coherent with the fsync issue... since it only affects
writes to disk, not reads.
Thanks Wietse!
Pete.
it may be a disk cache issue but
this is just a guess...
can anyone guess any circunstance (maybe in qmgr) that can explain this???
Pete.
each and every email?
- What happens if one of the IPs are not responding?
- If an email goes to the Deferred queue, when later on Postfix tries to send
it again, does it try with the same IP of the previous try?
Thanks,
-Pete.
o go.
Ether way, I've pushed most of the spam messages from the last 2 weeks through
amavis and I think they'll all be blocked with out bound filtering, but I think
this is a good intermediate step that will also lower overhead on outbound
filtering systems.
Thanks for your time,
--
Pete
nding auth sessions to a time limit to
help stop the bleeding.
Maybe this is a saslauthd question, not a postfix question, but any pointers or
links would be welcome.
Thanks,
--
Pete
t are rewritten every 30/60 seconds with
something like ddclient.
This is only good for limiting maybe login attempts, or something like that but
shouldn't be used for authentication to postfix and it would only work if you
were planning on dropping all packets to that port that aren't on the list so
it won't work on 25. Probably best to figure out the auth methods for postfix.
--
Pete
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Pete:
>> Hi Users,
>>
>> I'm hoping this is an obvious fix, but I don't have too much
>> experience with Postfix so before I change something, I want to ask
>> the experts.
>>
>>
problem, directly. Perhaps the
fact that it can't do a lookup on the domain causes a SOFTBOUNCE but I
don't want it to perform that lookup if the recipient matches the
alias. I also see in the config the "soft_bounce" flag, but I'm not
sure what the implications are of saying "no"
Thanks for your time.
Pete
ecommended
for Postfix setup assistance?
Thanks,
Pete
like how
I can change the way Postfix behaves using understandable parameter
names. Lots to learn of course ..
[pete@tooms ~]$ postconf -d | grep mail_version
mail_version = 2.8.7
Regards,
Pete.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 04/02/2012 18:45, Simon Brereton wrote:
On Feb 4, 2012 1:03 PM, "Pete" mailto:p...@nrth.org>> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2012 17:58, Nick Bright wrote:
>>
>> On 2/4/2012 11:47 AM, Pete wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
On 04/02/2012 17:58, Nick Bright wrote:
On 2/4/2012 11:47 AM, Pete wrote:
Hello,
Can someone confirm that the log excerpt below is most likely a bot of
some kind attempting to authenticate to my Postfix server please ?
That looks like a brute force attempt, or at least a bot looking for
next line :
Feb 4 15:00:32 tooms postfix/smtpd[89288]: lost connection after AUTH
from unknown[213.83.78.219]
This was between 15:00 and 15:08 today. 'altohiway.com' is now blocked
for the time being.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Pete.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
LinkedIn
Pete Berghold requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
Gabriele,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Pete
Accept invitation from Pete Berghold
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-6
small sites. If you run a domain with multiple
# machines, you should (1) change this to $mydomain and (2) set up
# a domain-wide alias database that aliases each user to
# u...@that.users.mailhost.
myorigin=domain.com
Regards,
Pete.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:53:40PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/20/2010 11:35 AM, Pete wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> >>Can someone please tell me the recommended way to do this in Postfix?
> >>I'm sure most of you ve
REJECT No thanks.
al...@example.tld OK
example.tld REJECT No thanks.
freespam.tldREJECT Go away.
interesting101@ OK
HTH.
Regards,
Pete.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:08:58AM +, Pete wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56:06AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> > On 11/13/2010 12:34 AM, Pete wrote:
> > >Hello all,
> > >
> > >I have finally attained the unenviable position of being able to
> &
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56:06AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/13/2010 12:34 AM, Pete wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I have finally attained the unenviable position of being able to
> >effortlessly see
> >the entire wood without being able to clearly ide
group: postfix
Thanks for any information anyone may have toward helping me set up SMTP AUTH
for clients on my LAN.
Regards,
Pete.
mycompany.com) and
send mail through that server without having to provide any means of
authentication to another domain entirely (e.g myothercompany.com) then
that is an open relay.
AFAICT your example used the same domain. If the mail server was
configured to accept mail for 'mycompany.com' then it's doing its job in
your example.
HTH.
Regards,
Pete.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
didn't on this
occasion. Consider me self-RTFMed! D'oh.
Cheers,
Pete
>
>
>Wietse
>
> > So apart from wanting to understand what is going on, my question is
> whether
> > or not I should just disable VRFY, and what are any pitfalls of doing so?
> I
252 but if it is broken and I
don't need it then I will turn it off.
Cheers,
Pete
28 matches
Mail list logo
