Re: Local delivery rejected

2010-06-03 Thread Paul McGougan
of who the sender is, and whether or not they are logged in? I would think this would be what people would normally want...? Paul McGougan Senior Software Engineer Braintree Communications Pty Ltd -- This information together with any attachments is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only

Re: Local delivery rejected

2010-06-03 Thread Paul McGougan
o many spammers using their hosting, that I changed away from using them as my SMTP about a year ago. The same goes for all of my family whose email accounts are the only things hosted on that domain. So that's not really a possibility unfortunately. Regards, Paul McGougan Senior Softwar

Re: Local delivery rejected

2010-06-03 Thread Paul McGougan
e a secure SMTP submission mechanism, but SO many spammers have domains on their service that their SMTP servers are blocked by EVERYONE :( I also should mention that this has been working for about a year, and only failed in the last week or so, almost certainly due to a change that they ha

Re: Local delivery rejected

2010-06-03 Thread Paul McGougan
ictions, so that they can still use this, but that local deliveries are accepted before this check is imposed? Thanks. Paul McGougan Senior Software Engineer Braintree Communications Pty Ltd -- This information together with any attachments is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only

Local delivery rejected

2010-06-03 Thread Paul McGougan
livered successfully. Does anyone have any suggestions? Paul McGougan Senior Software Engineer Braintree Communications Pty Ltd -- This information together with any attachments is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is subjec