Re: Forwarded mail problem

oper > > CERM - Polo Scientifico > via Sacconi, 6 - 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI) - ITALY > ---- ---- Paolo Barbato Consorzio RF

Re: OT? - Blocking attachments

t most users have no reason to receive is a fine > defensive > strategy. > > -- > Viktor. > Paolo Barbato Consorzio RFX <https://www.igi.cnr.it/>corso Stati Uniti,4 35127 Padova - Italy Network Administrator phone: +39 049 8295097 fax: +39 049 8700718

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

Apr 2017, at 08:15, Paolo Barbato <mailto:paolo.barb...@igi.cnr.it>> wrote: > > >> On 5 Apr 2017, at 01:08, Viktor Dukhovni > <mailto:postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 4, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Paolo Barbato >> &l

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

> On 5 Apr 2017, at 01:21, Brett @Google wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Paolo Barbato <mailto:paolo.barb...@igi.cnr.it>> wrote: > > I've anyway just receive a feedback from CGPro developers that I share as > promised: > >> For 6.2c3 (l

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

> On 5 Apr 2017, at 01:08, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > >> On Apr 4, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Paolo Barbato wrote: >> >> here new ldaprfx.cf >> >> server_host = 150.178.3.89:389 >> bind=no >> search_base = mail=%s,dc=cgprouter >> scope =

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

nder the dc=cgprouter base now returns > empty result rather than routing error. > > Th request with scope=base still returns error if the address can notbe > routed. Regards, Paolo Il giorno 04/apr/2017, alle ore 18.39, Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto: > >> On Apr

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

Hi Viktor, Il giorno 04/apr/2017, alle ore 18.02, Viktor Dukhovni ha scritto: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:48:33AM +0200, Paolo Barbato wrote: > >> I’m using following rules in main.cf >> >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >> permit_mynetworks, >>

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

tml> Regards, Paolo. > On 4 Apr 2017, at 16:53, Christian Rößner > wrote: > > Hi, > >> Am 04.04.2017 um 08:48 schrieb Paolo Barbato : >> >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > ... >> ldap:ldaprfx, > ... > > Maybe I am wrong, but aren't you mi

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

does not throw a not found on that > base when there is nothing matched ? > > On 4 Apr 2017, at 8:35 pm, Paolo Barbato <mailto:paolo.barb...@igi.cnr.it>> wrote: > >> I use CommuniGate as mailer and they allow a “virtual" ldap tree (very >&

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

The latter broke postfix . I’ve notified them about this, but I guess if can workaround it in postfix…. it seems not. Regards, Paolo. > On 4 Apr 2017, at 12:22, Michael Ströder wrote: > > Paolo Barbato wrote: >> postmap: warning: dict_ldap_lookup: >> /opt/trend/im

Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

results, not an error, which is what > you are getting.. > > Cheers > Brett > >> On 4 Apr 2017, at 4:48 pm, Paolo Barbato wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> I’m using following rules in main.cf >> >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions

smtpd_recipient_restrictions with ldap

Thanks for any hints . Regards, Paolo. -------- Paolo Barbato Consorzio RFX corso Stati Uniti,4 35127 Padova - Italy Network Administrator phone: +39 049 8295097 fax: +39 049 8700718