[pfx] Re: Do I have to reload Postfix after the X.509 certificate (and key) file has been renewed?

2024-03-23 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
23. März 2024, 16:25:47 CET schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 01:57:39PM +0100, Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > Also note, that the file which is configured in > > `smtpd_tls_chain_files` is only a symbolic link, e.g. >

[pfx] Re: How to set the minimum number of bits for (non-EC) DH key exchange?

2024-03-23 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
n TLS 1.2 and earlier depends on whether > any of the "kDHE" ciphers are included in the cipherlist. > > This feature is available in Postfix 3.8 and later, when it is compiled > and linked with OpenSSL 3.0 or later. Am Samstag, 23. März 2024, 13:02:05 CET schrieb Bastian Blank v

[pfx] Do I have to reload Postfix after the X.509 certificate (and key) file has been renewed?

2024-03-23 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Hello everybody, I use `smtpd_tls_chain_files` to set the X.509 certificate (and key) for Postfix. Do I have to reload Postfix, e.g. via `systemctrl reload postfix.service` after the certificate (and key) file has been renewed? The following sentence in https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#

[pfx] Why has smtpd_tls_cipherlist been deprecated?

2024-03-23 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Hello everybody, what is the rationale behind the deprecation of the setting `smtpd_tls_cipherlist`? Are there any plans to remove it entirely in some future versions? I am looking for an option to explicitly set the list of allowed cipher suites. The deprecated setting `smtpd_tls_cipherlist`

[pfx] How to set the minimum number of bits for (non-EC) DH key exchange?

2024-03-23 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Hi everyone, I am currently assessing the TLS security of a Postfix mail server and among other things sslscan reported that the server allows a (non-EC) DH exchange with only 1024 bits. While one solution would be to only allow ECDH(E) and disable DH(E) entirely, I would rather like to keep su

[pfx] Re: How to forward submitted mails under the identity of an email alias to all other members of that alias?

2024-02-11 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
do that. Thanks a lot. Am Sonntag, 11. Februar 2024, 16:33:33 CET schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:59:37AM +0100, Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users > wrote: > > > How do I forward submitted mails under the identity of an email alias > >

[pfx] How to forward submitted mails under the identity of an email alias to all other members of that alias?

2024-02-11 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Dear all, how do I forward submitted mails under the identity of an email alias to all other members of that alias? Is that even possible with Postfix only? I am running Postfix 3.8.4 with OpenLDAP as the backend for account and alias management. Postfix is setup for virtual mail hosting and tr

[pfx] Re: How to temporarily pause virtual mail delivery?

2023-11-22 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2023, 19:01:23 CET schrieb postfix--- via Postfix-users: > > I am looking for an option to temporarily pause delivery via LMTP and defer > > mail while the Dovecot mailboxes are being backed-up in order to get an > > consistent state. > > Just take dovecot LMTP offline

[pfx] How to temporarily pause virtual mail delivery?

2023-11-22 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
I am using Posfix with virtual mailboxes. Dovecot hosts these mailboxes and Posfix delivers mails via the LMTP delivery agent to Dovecot. I am looking for an option to temporarily pause delivery via LMTP and defer mail while the Dovecot mailboxes are being backed-up in order to get an consisten

[pfx] Re: Why does Postfix evaluate relay restrictions despite an early permit in recipient restriction?

2023-11-11 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Am Samstag, 11. November 2023, 18:51:04 CET schrieb Bill Cole via Postfix-users: > Nope. Review the restriction list docs. PERMIT only short-circuits the > current restriction list. Later restriction in the same list are > skipped, but later lists are still run. DENY or DEFER acts immediately. T

[pfx] Why does Postfix evaluate relay restrictions despite an early permit in recipient restriction?

2023-11-11 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Hello all, I am running Postfix 3.8.1. Postfix serves port 25 for incoming mail from other MTAs and port 587 for authenticated MUAs. Postfix is supposed to check SPF for mails from other MTAs on port 25, but not for mails from authenticated MUAs on port 587. To this end, there is a SPF check i

[pfx] Re: When using LDAP over socket, „smtpd_sender_login_maps“ requires an LDAP socket relative to chroot in contrast to other map configurations (potential bug?)

2023-11-05 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Dear Viktor, dear Wietse, Viktor, you recommend to use proxymap in combination with LDAP, especially if all LDAP lookups use the same connection. Indeed, this is the case for my setup. The LDAP server, the bind DN and bind passwd are the same. Only the search base, the query filter and the resu

[pfx] When using LDAP over socket, „smtpd_sender_login_maps“ requires an LDAP socket relative to chroot in contrast to other map configurations (potential bug?)

2023-11-04 Thread Matthias Nagel via Postfix-users
Hello all, I am using Postfix 3.8.1 on Ubuntu 23.10. Per distribution default, Postfix runs chrooted. I have setup LDAP lookups for most maps. OpenLDAP is only listening via UNIX socket on ldapi:///var/run/slapd/ldapi. For all but one LDAP lookup the corresponding Postfix configuration file loo