said it. I often tell customers that get burned by bad practices of
other companies on the net that the Internet is still a lot like the
wild west and if you want protection from the crazyness, you just have
to live in a town with a good sheriff.
--
Mark Krenz
IT Director
Suso Technology Services, Inc.
#x27;d think that over the
past decade I would have gotten better at coaxing users into giving me
all the details I need up front, but its still just as hard. So many
users are already in the blame the provider mode nowadays that you have
to disarm them first before you can get anything across.
opinion on this.
> Also note that some spam filters will add points for messages
> with no prior Received: headers, so sometimes you can't win
> either way.
How would they know if they didn't have a Received header for the
client IP? Or do you mean if all prior Received header
the preferred practice now or something.
--
Mark Krenz
IT Director
Suso Technology Services, Inc.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:01:02PM GMT, mouss [mo...@ml.netoyen.net] said the
following:
> >>
> >> 192.0.2.1:25 smtpd
> >>-o myhostname=vpn.example.com
> >
> > This answers the OP's question, but perhaps one should ask why the OP
> > believes this to be a good idea? There is gene
I'd say this is dangerous. How do you know that the IP used for
domain parking is not also used for working websites and even for the
mail for working domains? To make the list accurate, you'd have to peer
into the practices of web hosting providers. Sure, with a name like
sedoparking.com, th
