On 2014.09.25 16:34:51 +1000, Dr Michael Daly wrote:
> /(^Subject: [^a-z]+$)/ REJECT <--not working
To give an idea: /^Subject: [^a-z]+$)/i REJECT
i (default: on)
Toggles the case sensitivity flag. By default, matching is case
insensitive.
> Online PCRE regex checkers seem to indicate th
On 2013.11.21 16:42:10 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> I am trying to configure a fixed destination for a smtp transport in
> master.cf instead of confguring the destination in a transport_map.
> Since smtp has no special command-line option for this I suppose I
> have to specify a generic Postfix da
On 2013.11.21 17:45:29 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> Am 2013-11-21 17:26, schrieb Manuel Bieling:
> >On 2013.11.21 16:42:10 +0100, Michael Storz wrote:
> >You specify command line options for the smtp daemon via '-o'.
> >All options are well documented in
> >
On 2013.11.20 20:19:50 +0200, Dave Johnsom wrote:
> How Do I disable te plugin
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unlisted_recipient,
> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:777
On 2013.11.07 08:38:36 +0100, nik600 wrote:
> reading your answer i've understand that the service on 465 is already
> configured to force encryption, but i can't to that on port 25 because this
> port is used also for standard delivery from other mailserver which is not
> encrypted.
'-o smtpd_tls
On 2013.11.05 00:29:41 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Manuel Bieling skrev den 2013-11-05 00:22:
>
> >What the others said. That shouldn't happen. It's a problem with
> >clamav.
>
> incorrect, clamsmpt is at fault here, mails should not block on
> localhos
On 2013.11.04 11:42:51 -0800, inteq wrote:
> Nov 4 21:36:52 ns4 postfix/smtp[9383]: 338E14303B: to=,
> relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10025, delay=0.14, delays=0.06/0/0.05/0.03,
> dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Virus Detected; Discarded Email)
> Nov 4 21:36:52 ns4 clamsmtpd: 100013: from=r...@ns4.exampl
On 2013.10.28 21:54:00 +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Quoting wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema), Fri, 25 Oct 2013:
> >Adding check_sasl_sender_access support would not be difficult.
> >It just hasn't been done yet.
Not explicit, but ...
> Disabling the account is indeed a possibility, which we d
On 2013.10.25 14:21:11 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> > Apparently it is not a hoax, so the question remains, for those of
> > us who do not have the enterprise tools to lock down iPhones and
> > iPads, what is the best/most reliable way to simply block LinkedIn
> > from being able to successfully conn
On 2013.10.23 08:44:10 +0200, BONNET, Frank wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have to setup a "secured" email server
>
> - encrypted filesystem
> - SSL or TLS only for SMTP and IMAPS
> - Talking only to some known other same-secured servers
>
> Any info/links welcome !
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.
On 2013.10.08 09:16:11 +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> i never allowed any webserver in the past 10 years to
> use the sendmail binary for a lot of reasons like header
> injections and so on
Good, but possibly would not have helped. For me it looks obvious like
'Stealrat' which opens a socket t
On 2013.10.07 13:23:59 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On 10/01/13 07:22, Dominik George wrote:
> > Yes, I also face that issue and have forced IPv4 on known Google domains.
>
> I also have those problems.
>
> Is there an easy way in postfix the transport to some doamins just over
ou are now. Security is a process.
Manuel Bieling (layman)
On 10/02/2013 07:12 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
However, now that we see that the OP is using POP before SMTP
Aha I see, interesting relict
Manuel Bieling
nt_restrictions' is not want you want. You don't
want client side authentication. You want authentication for sending
mails, I think.
Finally authenticated users via 'permit_sasl_authenticated' can avoid
'spam checking', 'policy, gray listing' as early as it is checked. But
that is only relevant for 'smtpd_relay_restrictions'
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Manuel Bieling
fix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_auth_only
--
GPG Key: B0CD87E2 (1C46 4291 FD7A A695 795F 537C BAD0 8AEB B0CD 87E2)
--Manuel Bieling
On 08/21/2013 01:08 PM, Lang Alex wrote:
Hi there,
-debian 7, postfix 2.9.6
-no local domain, no mailboxes (root also aliased out of machine)
-only open relay with authorized people, mysql db backend
-no long way: postfix -dovecot sasl - pam - mysql conect
-only direct: postfix - local mysql
17 matches
Mail list logo
