Re: postscreen_whitelist_interfaces behind proxy

/permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/8881 / http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol)? Because in that case it would definitely be expected for postfix to be using the connection information from the frontend. Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Lukas Erlacher -- R

BUG: Typo in postscreen manpage

Prompted by the "gmail servers requiring postscreen_access whitelisting" thread I looked at http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html. There is an erroneous (right??) double negative: >The optional "after 220 server greeting" tests involve postscreen(8)'s >built-in SMTP protocol

Re: postfix/dovecot - [private/dovecot-lmtp]: No such file or directory

Hi, this is not a postfix problem. Furthermore it is fully covered in the dovecot docs. You need to put the dovecot-lmtp socket into /var/spool/postfix/private. This means the unix_listener must get the path to that. See here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP Also note tha

Re: PATCH: smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol + smtpd_tls_wrappermode

Thanks for the prompt support! Will you be merging this? In the next 3.1 development release, and in a month or so, in the next stable releases (2.9 .. 3.0). Wietse That's great to hear! Best, Luke smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: PATCH: smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol + smtpd_tls_wrappermode

Hi, Please try this. Wietse [patch] Works like a charm! I couldn't just patch our live server of course but I grabbed the ubuntu 14.04 postfix 2.11.0 source package on a VM, and the haproxy1.5 from trusty-backports and it works. Thanks for the prompt support! Will you be merging t

Re: PATCH: smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol + smtpd_tls_wrappermode

Thanks, I will try that! Best, Luke

smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol + smtpd_tls_wrappermode

Hello, I am trying to put haproxy in front of postfix and utilise the proxy protocol to get accurate client IPs. This works fine for all unencrypted / starttls based listeners, but not for tls-wrapped listeners using smtpd_tls_wrappermode. This is the haproxy configuration: frontend ft_smtps

Re: Do not send non-delivery notification

Ok :) but any way, do you know answer the answer to my question? L On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> > Lukas: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> ?well, I just set >>

Re: Do not send non-delivery notification

y question correctly - I need my smtp server not to send this "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" after it can not delivery mail to recipient.. Is that possible? -- Lukas www.nsoft.lt On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > >> Ma

Re: Do not send non-delivery notification

Hi, >>  my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any >> messages.. Is it possible? > > Yes And how? >>  It should be useful for mass mailing servers.. > > Why not use the non-delivery notifications to

Do not send non-delivery notification

Hello, my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any messages.. Is it possible? It should be useful for mass mailing servers.. -- Lukas UAB nSoft http://www.nsoft.lt +370 655 10 655

Re: exclude sender from aliases

little bit more pain than I expected :) Thanks a lot! lp On 10/12/10 17:36, Wietse Venema wrote: > Lukas Pirl: >> "Hello" to the community! :) >> >> Sorry for bothering the list initially with a technical question. >> >> I have setup a mail forwarder, th

exclude sender from aliases

"Hello" to the community! :) Sorry for bothering the list initially with a technical question. I have setup a mail forwarder, that is getting the aliases (mailing lists) from a MySQL database. How can I avoid, that the sender receives its own mail when he is on the mailing list? I thought about

Re: Black magic rejecting header Subjects

Dear Ken and Noel > Noel Jones [2009-08-04 19:06]: > > Lukas Ruf wrote: > >> # This is the access filter file for mail.securitysage.com, published by >> SecuritySage >> # This filter is the work of Jeffrey Posluns > > These header checks are no longer

Re: Black magic rejecting header Subjects

Dear MrC > MrC [2009-08-04 17:53]: > > On 8/4/2009 1:02 AM, Lukas Ruf wrote: > >>> On Monday 03 August 2009 15:34:59 Lukas Ruf wrote: >>>> I cannot understand why Postfix/cleanup rejects particular Subject >>>> lines, since I have been searching for

Re: Black magic rejecting header Subjects

Dear all > /dev/rob0 [2009-08-03 23:05]: > > On Monday 03 August 2009 15:34:59 Lukas Ruf wrote: > > I cannot understand why Postfix/cleanup rejects particular Subject > > lines, since I have been searching for the respective regexps but > > haven't found what I&#

Black magic rejecting header Subjects

sing "postfix 2.6.2~rc1-1". My real problem is, that regularly I make use of the German term "Offerte" (Offer) due to business reasons when I send eMails. Much worse it would be if "Offerte" is rejected on the inbound way. I would definitely appreciate any help very mu