Dear MrC > MrC <lists-post...@cappella.us> [2009-08-04 17:53]: > > On 8/4/2009 1:02 AM, Lukas Ruf wrote: > >>> On Monday 03 August 2009 15:34:59 Lukas Ruf wrote: >>>> I cannot understand why Postfix/cleanup rejects particular Subject >>>> lines, since I have been searching for the respective regexps but >>>> haven't found what I've been looking for. My question is simple: >>>> why are subject lines rejected that I cannot find definitions for? >>> >>> Probably because they match expressions in your undisclosed [!!] >>> file of header_checks(5). >>> >> >> Please find attached the header_checks file currently in use: >> > > This header_checks file is out of control. It rejects many perfectly > reasonable Subjects: >
Thank you very much for your reply! It dates back to somewhen in 2003.... > > Spend some time learning about REs. And consider instead of this > monstrosity header_checks file a content filter or other more sufficient > means. > > If you must use header_check rules, include unique identifiers at the > end of your REJECTs so that you can find which ones hit. See example > with <---- HERE above. > > See: > http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html > http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html > http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTION_README.html Thank you very much for the recommendation. I definitely will! wbr, Lukas -- Lukas Ruf <http://www.lpr.ch> | Ad Personam Consecom <http://www.consecom.com> | Ad Laborem