On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, mouss wrote:
- write your own policy server or milter
Hi,
There is a GeoIP policy server out there if you search around, it is
called: geoip-policyd-0.01.tar.gz
With some modifications, it works quite nicely.
Justin.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Linda Pagillo wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm new to the list and I'm trying to gather some information
about Postfix for my documentation notes. I looked all over the place to try
and find the answer to this question, but I was unable to, so I thought I
would ask the list.
Wil
Hi,
When I attach large images > 5-10MiB/s, sometimes this occurs, I tried
setting:
tcp_windowsize = 65535
I also tried setting ecn to 0.
But neither seemed to fix the problem below. I can send the same images
to an Exchange server and they send through with no problems. Also, if I
send s
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/26/2010 12:33 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
This needs to be more specific so you don't remove headers added by other
servers. Maybe:
/^Received: from localhost.*by lucidpixels\.com / IGNORE
If you need special header_checks for your am
Hi,
How do I remove the: Received: from localhost line at the top of the e-mail
message?
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: myusern...@mydomain.com
Delivered-To: myusern...@mydomain.com
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by lucidpixels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9354321
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, postfix@cmulcahy.com wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Security Admin (NetSec) :
Could someone provide links to sites where IP addresses are grouped by
country?
I use (the free) geoip database for that.
This script has proven useful for me...
http://www.cyberciti
Hi,
You want: PREPEND
http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
PREPEND text...
Prepend one line with the specified text, and
inspect the next input line.
Notes:
o The prepended text is output on a separate
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 02:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:28 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Thu, July 23, 2009 01:07, Sahil Tandon wrote:
% postconf message_strip_charters
postconf: warning: message_strip_charters:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote:
I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to
smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to
smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You are doing Sender Address Verification (reject_unverified_sender)
before doing RBL checks. Fix this. Do the RBL checks first, and consider
not doing SAV at all, but if you do use it, do SAV *last*.
smtpd_data_restrictions =
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, mouss wrote:
Justin Piszcz a écrit :
RIP: dnsbl.clue-by-4.org
http://dnsbl.clue-by-4.org/parking.php?domain_name=clue-by-4.org
Not sure exactly when but FYI, this RBL appears to be no more.
This is the first time I hear about such DNSBL...
can you please send a mail
RIP: dnsbl.clue-by-4.org
http://dnsbl.clue-by-4.org/parking.php?domain_name=clue-by-4.org
Not sure exactly when but FYI, this RBL appears to be no more.
Justin.
$ whois linendim.com
Record created on:2008-12-15 11:45:30.0
Database last updated on: 2008-12-15 11:42:09.153
Domain Expires on:2009-12-15 11:45:31.0
A 1-second life domain name.
First, is there an existing policy server out there that checks how many
d
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform.
Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender
an a particular client.
In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put:
smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_sender
Quick question--
Nov 30 17:39:03 p34 postfix/smtpd[15257]: 6B3A310676:
client=localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Nov 30 17:39:03 p34 postfix/cleanup[15260]: 6B3A310676: message-id=<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Nov 30 17:39:03 p34 postfix/qmgr[18872]: 6B3A310676: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
size=430, nrcpt=1
Was curious if there were any daemons out there that currently did this, or if
I should just modify the main spf checking script that openspf.org provides?
Nov 19 13:32:39 p34 postfix/policy-spf[15114]: : SPF SoftFail (Mechanism '~all'
matched): Envelope-from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 19 13:32:39
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Petr Janda wrote:
Hi all,
I have got reports about lost mail(not received, im the receiver not the
sender) recently and trying to find out whats going on seems to be beyond me.
Basically a lot of email is lost with "timeout after DATA"
For example:
timeout after DATA (0
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having DNS issues when delivering mail on a postfix server.
The server seems to run fine for several hours. After a while, emails
start to stay in the queue with the fo
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I'm implementing greylisting on CentOS 5 systems.
These are spools for the actual mailserver/mailbox systems.
Currently we have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining,
If someone gets a moment-- he/she should add gross to the postfix policy
page: http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
Homepage URL:
http://code.google.com/p/gross/
From page description:
* it's blazingly fast
* it's amazingly resource efficient
* it can be configured to query DNSBL dat
Even after using:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11500.html
I still get these occasionally, both from localhost and other (real) hosts:
Oct 29 17:54:59 p34 postfix/smtpd[9883]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from
oss.sgi.com[192.48.170.157]
Oct 29 17:55:00 p34 postfix/smtpd[9906
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Justin Piszcz:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing xfs mailing
list to confirm.
would violate a basic requiremen
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Richard Foley wrote, at 10/22/2008 07:56 AM:
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 01:27:51 Terry Carmen wrote:
check_client_access=regexp:/etc/postfix/spam_ip_regex
spam_ip_regex file:
/[ax]dsl.*\..*\..*/i 450 AUTO_XDSL Email Rejected. You appear to be
c
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:06 PM
To: Joey
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
To: Joey
Subject: RE: F
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Joey wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:37 PM
To: Joey
Subject: RE: Finally blocking some spam
What anti-spam measurements do you currently use?
What does your main.cf look like?
(Snip
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, James Brown wrote:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> James Brown schrieb:
>> Would anyone who checks DKIM sigs on incoming mails mind if I send
>> them an email directly?
>>
>> That way I can make sure it is not just the DKIM reflector that's
>> giving false results somehow.
>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Adrien wrote:
I don't know why the mail is send to ns9.bacto.net (my server here is
ns12.bacto.net and the MX is ns9.bacto.net).
Somebody has an idea ? An other method to do this ?
I can do it with multiple instance of postfix but I think it's not a
perfomant solution,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'd think that amavisd-new may have problems. What does amavisd-new
log at a hight log_level?
Of course, it has not recurred since I enabled log_level 5, I will wait
and then follow-up once it happens again, thanks.
The mail causing the problem
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the program that feeds postfix?
amavisd-new
I'd think that amavisd-new may have problems. What does amavisd-new
log at a hight log_level?
Of course, it has not recurred since I enable
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Thanks Wietse,
Per http://www.postfix.org/smtpd.8.html
Which parameter needs to be tweaked for the smtpd process so these
timeouts no longer occur? I am
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Justin Piszcz:
Regarding the timeout...
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: disconnect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
That
Regarding the timeout...
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: timeout after END-OF-MESSAGE from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Aug 11 19:02:23 p34 postfix/smtpd[19254]: disconnect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
# See the following URL for cache_on_demand:
# http://www.mail-archive
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Please keep responses on the list:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 10:27 AM:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Jorey Bump wrote:
Justin Piszcz wrote, at 08/08/2008 07:53 AM:
Multiple PTR records tend to be returned in a round robin fashion:
$ host
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
When it re-connected (after greylisting, then it
On the server w/ postfix:
$ host 38.119.56.160
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.testemail.newegg.com.
160.56.119.38.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mta700.email.newegg.com.
Is the reason below why it shows up as unknown because the fwd/reverse do
not match properly, or?
37 matches
Mail list logo
