Hi, now that Viktor spotted the config error and fixed yesterday's
problem, I'm back with what I hope is another dumb question. Having
wrestled Cyrus authentication to a draw, now I'm trying Dovecot which I
would have hoped would be easier. It's the same Debian box.
First I set up Dovecot an
Last month I asked for advice on limiting specific senders
to specific recipients, and Wietse offered this:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/restricted_senders
smtpd_restriction_classes = joe_user_acl
joe_user_acl =
I've been poking at this for a week with no luck at all. I presume I am
doing something dumb but I can't see what.
I have what I think is a bog standard debian systen running in a virtual
machine on my laptop, with the usual postfix and sasl packages. All of
the mail addresses and mailboxes
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024, Jeff Peng wrote:
I think postscreen can block them easily.
I'm looking at the postscreen man page and I don't see anything about mail
addresses. Am I missing something?
I do see smtpd_command_filter. How about if I map MAIL FROM: to QUIT?
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@t
Well, the header lines are properly terminated by CRLF. However, the
text lines are whatever I get from postfix. Generally that is just a
LF. I copied the text and inserted the CRs and sent it to see what
happens. I get the same result: = signs at each fold point.
Those = signs are somethi
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023, Wietse Venema wrote:
The real reason is that it's easier to convince a few delinquent
MTA implementors, than an IETF working group.
The WG isn't opposed but we have a very long list of nits to clean up so
I'd rather make the list shorter if as in this case it doesn't matte
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Of course, implementing a HELP command is also not much work, so why
not?
That's the conclusion we came to in emailcore. It's so easy to implement
that even though it's been a long time (if ever) since it did anything
useful, it's not worth the hassl
