* Noel Jones [2013-01-23 12:37:28 -0600]:
> On 1/23/2013 12:30 PM, Tom Tucker wrote:
> >
> > I think I got it. The ordering is critical. Thanks
> >
> >
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains #
> > This will allow clients missing
[ Stan Hoeppner Wrote On Thu 22.Nov'12 at 8:19:21 GMT ]
> On 11/21/2012 7:01 PM, Alex wrote:
>
> > I pulled the IPs out of the logs for these 'lost connection' errors
> > over the last 24hrs, and it does appear that there are multiple IPs in
> > the same network losing the connection. This also
/ IMAP List Administration wrote on Tue 13.Nov'12 at 21:55:11 +0100 /
> [example of delivery failure]
> Nov 13 15:10:29 dna prefilter/smtpd[9340]: connect from unknown[8.7.42.206]
I've been getting client requests from this ip as well, i've put it into a
permenant spamd(8) blacklist.
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 11:01:54 +0100 /
> On 09/11/2012 10:35, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > / Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 /
> >
> >> On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> >>>
> >
/ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Fri 9.Nov'12 at 10:06:14 +0100 /
> On 09/11/2012 08:40, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > / David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 /
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi
> >> wrote:
> &g
/ David Rees wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 14:59:01 -0800 /
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> > I think I have a problem with my simple mail server. I noticed several
> > bounce mails in the queue, which postfix in unable to deliver.
>
> You're seeing the same issue as was
/ Reindl Harald wrote on Fri 2.Nov'12 at 11:57:15 +0100 /
> Am 02.11.2012 08:38, schrieb Jamie Paul Griffin:
> > / Han Boetes wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 15:15:51 +0100 /
> > I do have a name server running on my lan. I wouldn't set up a mailserver
> > syste
/ Han Boetes wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 15:15:51 +0100 /
> Consider setting up a caching nameserver like unbound on your server.
> Having a local cache on a mailserver is good thing™
I do have a name server running on my lan. I wouldn't set up a mailserver
system without it. I have been doing tha
/ Han Boetes wrote on Fri 2.Nov'12 at 6:08:20 +0100 /
> I look with great fright upon the day that the format of that dbase will
> change. The mailflow on my private server will be completely undone!
>
> Anyway. No worries, I'll check the code and see what I can come up with.
>
> It's just my
/ Alex wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 9:03:00 -0400 /
> Hi,
>
> >> I have a fc15 server with postfix-2.8.10 and have enabled postscreen.
> >> I've enabled it before without any difficulty, so I'm not sure what
> >> I'm doing wrong in this case. For some reason it is printing these
> >> errors periodi
/ Wietse Venema wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 7:48:44 -0400 /
> Han Boetes:
> > After that postscreen gets to deal with whatever comes next. Now incase
> > postscreen decides that the ip is a zombie it's being blacklisted by
> > postscreen. In that case I'd like to hand the ip back to OpenBSD spamd.
[ Noel Jones wrote on Wed 17.Oct'12 at 16:32:28 -0500 ]
> > I'm almost changing by cyrus.
>
> I doubt cyrus will be any easier to configure, but use whatever
> works for you.
Stick with Dovecot - cyrus is more tricky in my experience, especially
as you are having trouble with your current set-up
[ Renato wrote on Wed 17.Oct'12 at 16:06:40 +0200 ]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, I'm new to postfix and MTAs in general; I'd like to set it up for
> local delivery only on my Archlinux box. I've followed the instructions
> on the archwiki [1] and my configuration file
[ Patrick Ben Koetter wrote on Fri 14.Sep'12 at 7:31:10 +0200 ]
> * Chris Adams :
> > I'm configuring Postfix with SpamAssassin, using Spampd as a
> > before-queue filter. I put "/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/ REJECT Spam detected"
> > in /etc/postfix/header_checks, and that works (spam is rejected during
[ /dev/rob0 wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 8:47:06 -0500 ]
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:23:12PM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> > I never realized that I had this issue too. But, after running
> > the tests, I found out that my queries were indeed blocked by
> > spamhaus.
> >
> > So, I changed the servers a
[ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 23:22:20 +0200 ]
> On 21/08/2012 19:34, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> > Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your
> > advice I finally ended up with:
> >
> > OpenBSD + postfix-anti-UCE.txt + undeadly's spamd setup (which
> > includes gr
[ Mikkel Bang wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 21:06:20 +0200 ]
> Thanks for the reply Francis!
>
> Here on OpenBSD, spamd takes care of the greylisting so I'm all set there.
>
> After much going back and forth regarding amavisd-new+spamassassin, I came
> to the conclusion that it was an overly complex
== Stan Hoeppner wrote on Fri 10.Aug'12 at 10:57:24 -0500 ==
> On 8/10/2012 8:31 AM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>
> > what are current 'recommended' rbl lists that people use ?
>
> This thread could potentially explode with responses. Probably best to
> nip it in the bud now. This subject is deci
> > amavisd-new/spamassassin/spamassassin-fuzzyocr/clamav. Would
> > it behoove me to run Postgrey, too?
You could consider using OpenBSD's spamd - i find it works well for me.
jamie
19 matches
Mail list logo
