Re: Public free (libre) mailbox hosting service for everybody!

2013-02-28 Thread James Seymour
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:51:15 +0200 אנטולי קרסנר wrote: > No, the mailing list is a legitimate way to connect with all postfix > users ... The mailing list I thought was supposed to be about Postfix, or at least vaguely Postfix-related, issues. By your logic: If I want to interact with all Postf

Re: Public free (libre) mailbox hosting service for everybody!

2013-02-28 Thread James Seymour
Isn't this *thoroughly* off-topic for this mailing list? Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at

Re: SPF Policy Daemon: Sender vs. Recipient Rejected?

2012-05-11 Thread James Seymour
On Thu, 10 May 2012 23:23:43 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-05-10 14:40, James Seymour skrev: > > > Eh? Explain, please? > > check_policy_service must be after reject_unlisted_recipient [snip] > > that makes sure greylist is not called for unlisted users th

Re: SPF Policy Daemon: Sender vs. Recipient Rejected?

2012-05-10 Thread James Seymour
On Wed, 09 May 2012 01:22:27 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-05-08 15:43, Jona - DTNX Postmaster skrev: > > > The '550 ... rejected:' is Postfix, the rest is the reply Postfix > > got from the SPF policy daemon. Customizing that reply may be > > another option to clarify what is happening

SPF Policy Daemon: Sender vs. Recipient Rejected?

2012-05-08 Thread James Seymour
Hi All, I'm using the SPF policy daemon. Works great (or appears to, anyway), save one thing: The rejects claim "Recipient address rejected," when, in reality, it's the sender's address that's being rejected. This leads to confusion. Short of reworking my rules so I can place the SPF check unde

Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.4 Released

2012-02-01 Thread James Seymour
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:23:46 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > > Thanks, Jim. You're welcome, Wietse. And thank *you* for Postfix. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept

Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.4 Released

2012-02-01 Thread James Seymour
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:00:39 -0500 James Seymour wrote: > Pflogsumm version 1.1.3 has been released. This is a Beta release. [snip] *sigh* s/1.1.3/1.1.4/ The Subject: is correct. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this em

Re: Pflogsumm Version 1.1.4 Released

2012-02-01 Thread James Seymour
I *just* realized that, in previous release announcements, I hadn't been writing about where to get it from. Doh! Here you go: http://jimsun.linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and

Pflogsumm Version 1.1.4 Released

2012-02-01 Thread James Seymour
Pflogsumm version 1.1.3 has been released. This is a Beta release. From the ChangeLog: rel-1.1.4 20120201 Modified for compatibility with -o syslog_name=blurfl/submission and -o syslog_name=blurfl/smtps set in master.cf. (These are the defaults in Postfix 2.9 and beyond.)

Re: Outlook 2003 Client SASL Login Problem?

2012-01-30 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:21:36 -0600 Noel Jones wrote: [snip] > > If the client attempts SASL, postfix will log either success or > failure. Looks as if the client didn't even try. Exactly. And that should've been my clue that the mechanism(s) offered weren't to the client's liking. Wietse pic

Re: Outlook 2003 Client SASL Login Problem?

2012-01-30 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:08:55 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > > Have you compared the SMTP server EHLO replies (with openssl > s_client)? No. That'd be difficult, tho not impossible, to do at this point, as the old server is up in storage. But this is certainly an Outlook 2003 -speci

Re: Outlook 2003 Client SASL Login Problem?

2012-01-30 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:51 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > [snip] > > at least show some parts of the logfile Very well. Not much to see... Jan 29 20:42:26 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[7781]: connect from c-68-43-238-106.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[68.43.238.106] Jan 29 20:42:27 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[

Outlook 2003 Client SASL Login Problem?

2012-01-30 Thread James Seymour
Hi All, Just upgraded our mailserver. Thought I had everything set the same as I did with the old one. Nonetheless, of all the people who *can't* send email, it would have to be the President of the company. I do have "broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes". Postfix version is 2.7.0, running on an Ub

Re: Stats on smtp method used by clients (with pflogsumm or not)

2012-01-20 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:00:14 +0200 Nikolaos Milas wrote: [snip] > > Can you please at least provide directions on how to do the fix when > logging as "postfix/submission/smtpd"?? Quick fix is attached as "pflogsumm_quickfix.txt." There's no line numbers, as I'm working from the next rev, whic

Re: Stats on smtp method used by clients (with pflogsumm or not)

2012-01-20 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:52:21 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: > James Seymour: > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:15:35 -0500 (EST) > > Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > In the logging you will see postfix/smtps/smtpd, > > >

Re: Stats on smtp method used by clients (with pflogsumm or not)

2012-01-20 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:15:35 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > > In the logging you will see postfix/smtps/smtpd, > postfix/submission/smtpd and postfix/smtpd. [snip] Two things (addressed to the OP and other readers): 1. This will break Pflogsumm. It expects to see "postfix/smtpd

Re: Postfix "lost connection after DATA from unknown..." and ipfilter "-AF OUT" log message

2011-12-12 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:11:26 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: > James Seymour: > > > The TCP stack sends an outbound ACK|RST because it received > > > *something* on port 25. Your firewall should not have passed that. > > > > Should not have passed it *in

Re: Postfix "lost connection after DATA from unknown..." and ipfilter "-AF OUT" log message

2011-12-12 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:24:38 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > > There are two stateful engines: the TCP stack and ipfilter. *nodding* > > With "keep state", ipfilter "remembers" the connection and lets > packets pass, up to the point that ipfilter believes the connection > no longer

Re: Postfix "lost connection after DATA from unknown..." and ipfilter "-AF OUT" log message

2011-12-12 Thread James Seymour
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:57:12 -0500 Jim Seymour wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:03:59 -0500 (EST) > Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Wietse Venema: > > > > bge1 @0:24 b ,25 -> 89.73.201.168,36545 PR > > > > tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT > > > > > > Why are you blocking outbound TCP RST? [snip] > > >

Re: hide private ip in header

2011-12-05 Thread James Seymour
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:10:11 +0530 (IST) Ramesh wrote: > Hi List, > > I > would like know to steps required to hide private ip address in > postfix, ... [snip] Header checks with appropriate regexp and IGNORE. > ...and also shows public ip address of firewall instead of > public ip address of m

Re: Problem with smtp client bind address

2011-12-01 Thread James Seymour
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:27:07 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema wrote: [snip] > I suggest that you use different smtp_bind_address settings in > master.cf for the (default) smtp transport and for the (inbound) > relay transport. This server is, amongst other things, a mail gateway. It accepts incoming on

Re: Couple of config questions

2011-12-01 Thread James Seymour
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:45:53 -0700 Philip Prindeville wrote: > Sorry about the noob questions, but it's been 12 years or more since > I stared at Postfix... > > First, is there a way to get an out-of-the-box (in my case, Postfix > 2.6.6 compiled for Centos6/EPEL6) to get $mydomain and $myhostnam

Problem with smtp client bind address

2011-12-01 Thread James Seymour
Good Day, I'm trying to bring up a new machine that serves several purposes and have run into a potentially Very Big Problem. The machine has two physical interfaces, one LAN-facing and one Internet-facing. So, naturally, I have something like: Let's say 10.1.1.0 is the Internet-facing network

Re: reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch vs reject_sender_login_mismatch

2011-11-02 Thread James Seymour
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:12:07 -0400 Simon Brereton wrote: [snip] > ... but if I put reject_unknown_recipient_domain there > postconf.5 says it will > > Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the > recipient domain, and the RCPT TO domain has no DNS A or MX record, or > when i

Re: reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch vs reject_sender_login_mismatch

2011-11-02 Thread James Seymour
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:31:14 -0400 Simon Brereton wrote: [snip] > > ## SPAM STUFF and REJECT CODES ## > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_non_fqdn_recipient, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_che

Re: statistics tool for postfix log files

2011-10-28 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:17:12 +0200 wei...@dfbnet.org wrote: > Hi all, [snip] > > I read about mailgraph and pflogsumm but these stats are not > as detailed as i try to have. You want *more* detail than Pflogsumm gives? Wow. Most people have been pestering me to *reduce* it. On Fri, 28 Oct 20

Re: Backscatter Assistance?

2011-08-05 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:24:41 -0400 (EDT) Gary Chambers wrote: [snip] > > Thanks. Once the sick feeling in my stomach subsided and I started > seeing things a bit more clearly, I realized that I just probably had > to ride it out. Ride it out? LOL! That's probably going to get worse, if anythi

Re: Backscatter Assistance?

2011-08-05 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:23:42 -0400 (EDT) Gary Chambers wrote: > Jim, > > > What problem are you trying to solve? > > Thanks for the reply. > > I've been poring over the backscatterer README and from what I can > tell, my server isn't the problem. I don't see a problem, other than people trying

Re: Backscatter Assistance?

2011-08-05 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:41:16 -0400 (EDT) Gary Chambers wrote: [snip] > > Will someone please assist me in determining the problem or offer any > short- (or long-) term suggestions? Thank you very much! What problem are you trying to solve? Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* a

Multiple Domains, Mail Gateway, Two Mail Servers

2011-08-05 Thread James Seymour
G'day All, My Postfix fu is weak these days, so I'm going to ask for a bit of help. I've dredged-up all I could remember of advanced Postfix techniques, trawled the various docs and HowTos, and haven't been able to solve this. We have multiple domains. We have one mail gateway. We have two mai

Re: Sending images in email using postfix

2011-04-15 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:50:21 +0100 Houcem HACHICHA wrote: > Hi, > > I am using postfix and I would like to send an image in the email > signature. > Any idea how to do this? Postfix is an MTA (Mail Transport Agent, or mail server). Things like what goes in your email signature, etc. are a matt

Re: acquire Postfix statistics

2011-04-15 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:17:06 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * James Seymour : > > > I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics > > *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)? > > The server could be gather

Re: acquire Postfix statistics

2011-04-15 Thread James Seymour
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:15:50 +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > Am 15.04.2011 15:06, schrieb James Seymour: > > I'm curious: How might one gather and process mail server statistics > > *other* than parsing and processing the mail server's log file(s)? > &

Re: acquire Postfix statistics

2011-04-15 Thread James Seymour
Replying to Yan via a follow-up to Zoltan, as I didn't see Yan's original question... On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:08:30 +0200 Zoltan Balogh wrote: > 2011/4/12 Zhou, Yan > [snip] > > I have seen some options relying on passing the maillog file, I > > wonder if there is any other option? > > [snip]

Re: pflogsumm by domain

2011-04-12 Thread James Seymour
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:06:22 +0300 Tolga wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to have pflogsumm detail the report by domain? eg. > > 291 messages received by example.com > 354 messages received by example.net > xxx messages received by example.org [snip] No. Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail serve