nes.
The transport map would therefore read similar to the following:
noa.gr relay:noa.gr.local
I have then configured A records for the multiple relay destinations, queries
are then balanced in a DNS round robin fashion.
It's perhaps not the most elegant solution but *touch wood* it hasn't caused me
any issues.
Kind regards,
James Day
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of martijn.list
> Sent: 16 January 2014 12:17
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Message Bounced for Domain with no A record
>
> On 01/16/
r_login_mismatch
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/smtp.ontraq.com.pem
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/smtp.ontraq.com.key
smtpd_tls_loglevel = 0
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
Kind regards,
James Day
gt; >
> > You made a configuration error. Unfortunately, I am not telepathic.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> Not very helpful.
> Does anyone else have any advice on this?
Unfortunately you have not provided enough information. At very least you
should be posting relevant logs and postconf -n output.
Kind regards,
James Day
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 12:06 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: smtpd_sender_login_maps and out of office messages
>
> J
of office messages / automatic
replies (ie where there is no sender address)?
Kind regards,
James Day
to john.sm...@example.com it would be aliased to
john.sm...@example.com and catch...@offsite.com
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
James Day
--snip--
> Not in this case, sending NDRs with a non-null envelope sender address is a
> fundamental violation of the robustness requirements of SMTP. This goes
> beyond working-around misconfiguration to flagrant violation of a basic
> design requirement that prevents congestive collapse of the ma
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
> Sent: 14 February 2013 15:43
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Null sender address in NDR's
>
>
>
> Am
.
> > Is there a sensible way to configure postfix to allow these messages
> > with null sender addresses to be relayed without opening the smart
> > host up to exploitation?
>
> Sending bounces is not "exploitation", but the "smart host" (really
> submission service) policy is up to the ISP. Ask
l sender addresses to stop loops (bouncing bounce-backs!).
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
ers, jpk
That's a good point, it might be worthwhile looking into something like a php
script that interfaces with an SMS API. I've seen that done in the past.
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
nt`|/usr/sbin/sendmail -f r...@example.com repo...@example.com ; fi
These run as cron jobs every few minutes.
Hope that helps.
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
te then use virtual_alias_maps as below:
u...@example.comu...@example.com, u...@example2.com
Set a transport route for the new domain (example2.com in the above example)
And then use postsuper -r ALL to requeue the messages.
The originals will get stuck again but the aliased addresses will be delivered
to your POP/IMAP/whatever server.
Kind regards,
James Day
gt; Dominique
>
Please post the output of postconf -n
I cannot say for certain but I would imagine your problem is your configuration
of smtpd_recipient_restrictions, you'll need to add something like
permit_sasl_authenticated prior to your reject statement.
However this is all speculation without your configuration details.
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
> -Original Message-
> From: Marius Lewies [mailto:mariu...@verpakt.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2012 15:03
> To: James Day; Ansgar Wiechers; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Postfix Issue
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Day [mailto:james.
get upset.
Mistakes do happen, I find myself automatically clicking the reply button
instead of reply to all so you're not alone.
The people on this list are willing to help you. You just need to help yourself
a bit by reading the appropriate documentation. Postfix is possibly the best
documented piece of open source software and as such it is frustrating when
people come to the list with issues that could be easily resolved by reading it.
PS
Polite notice: Please don't top post on the list - it makes the conversations
much harder to follow.
Kind regards,
James Day
you will achieve with your misplaced requests for
removal is draw attention to the data that you wish to be removed.
Unfortunately the damage is done. If your systems are secure then a few exposed
IP addresses really shouldn't trouble you.
Kind regards,
James Day
t;> >>
> >> >> Can this be changed?
> >> >
> >> > Not without getting rid of smtpd_proxy_filter
> >>
> >> Can I reject mails without smtpd_proxy_filter?
> >
> > At this point you will do better if you back up and describe the
> > problem you're trying to solve. Where/why do you need the queue ID
> > displayed?
>
> For diagnostic reasons.
>
> --
> Chris
You could try implementing amavis using the content_filter parameter (after
queue content filter). Instead of smtpd_proxy_filter (before queue content
filter)
Kind regards,
James Day
lback_relay solution.
Wietse
Hi Wietse,
When you say a better OS, I'd be interested to know what your preference is.
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: 06 February 2012 14:19
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: reject unknown helo hostname
On 2/6/2012 7:36 AM, James Day wrote:
> Just wanted to get pub
basis, is there a better way?
Kind regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
ese methods. Broadly speaking, some
>Microsoft clients only support LOGIN, some third-party clients only support
>PLAIN.
>There's no reason to not offer both.
> -- Noel Jones
Thanks Noel, as ever you've provided valuable insight. Your help is very much
appreciated.
Kind regards,
James Day
n't
particularly helpful.
Kind regards,
James Day
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: 31 January 2012 04:22
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: SASL authentication and Windows Live Mail
ing the same account details from Windows Live Mail throws up a:
"554 Relay Access denied" error message.
Is this a known problem with the Windows Live Mail client or do I need to dig
deeper?
Kind regards,
James Day
said, just an idea.
Kind Regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
Ontraq Limited
Tel: 01245 265100
Fax: 01245 265700
Web: www.ontraq.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Leslie León Sinclair
Sent: 11 January 2012
It should be delivered via the local transport, just set "-o content_filter="
under local in master.cf to override.
Kind Regards,
James Day
(IT Engineer)
Ontraq Limited
Tel: 01245 265100
Fax: 01245 265700
Web: www.ontraq.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-
I think you need to be using virtual_mailbox_maps to create a list of valid
recipients.
Also I can see that dovecot has also accepted the message so you must have
configured something like "allow_all_users=yes".
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [own
> Datum: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:04:15 +
> Von: James Day
> An: "lupin...@gmx.net" , "postfix-users@postfix.org"
>
> Betreff: RE: virtual_alias_maps / mysql problem
> First make sure that the domain you are sending to is set as a virtual
> mail
First make sure that the domain you are sending to is set as a virtual mailbox
domain. It sounds like you've already set the virtual transport to dovecot
which is right. If you think mysql is the issue try making a virtual alias maps
hash file.
***Sent via RoadSync® for Android™
-Original
s the way to go.
***Sent via RoadSync® for Android™
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Dec 08, 2011 7:56 PM
To: James Day, postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Aliasing for any user
On 12/8/2011 6:45 AM, James Day wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First post to the list, I wou
Hello,
First post to the list, I would really appreciate any help/advice.
In my current setup I act as a Spam and Virus filter for several domains. Mail
is then relayed to their local Exchange servers once it has been scanned.
In the event that their Exchange server is down and they require eme
32 matches
Mail list logo
