On Friday, August 21, 2015 01:44:07 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> J. Roeleveld:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There are occasions I need to send emails asking for "read receipts".
> > Some MUAs allow this to be enabled when necessary, defaulting to "off".
> >
Hi all,
There are occasions I need to send emails asking for "read receipts".
Some MUAs allow this to be enabled when necessary, defaulting to "off".
However, some have a global setting that needs enabling/disabling (K9mail on
Android is one of them)
With these on, I tend to annoy people on mai
On Monday 24 January 2011 18:38:55 polofuzzu wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 17:35, Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 1/24/2011 11:20 AM, polofuzzu wrote:
> >> Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions.
> >> Please see respond inline
> >>
> >> On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor Duchovni
> >>
On Monday 03 January 2011 17:35:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> J. Roeleveld:
> > On Monday 03 January 2011 04:12:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Mark Scholten:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Should I look in the source or is there a better location
On Mon, January 3, 2011 1:26 pm, Ralf W. wrote:
> Hello List - I have a client who has a MS-SBS and using a pop3 connector
> to pop
> emails from our server. It turns out that the SBS at some messages will
> not
> pull the email, and is saying that the email header from this email is
> corrupted.
On Monday 03 January 2011 04:12:46 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mark Scholten:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Should I look in the source or is there a better location to change the
> > texts returned by Postfix after the error code for a connecting MTA? I'd
> > like to give custom messages back for (example) a fai
you can always increase the
allowed size of these emails to match.
--
Joost
>
> On 12/20/2010 01:17 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I'm searching for an automated solution that wi
On Monday 20 December 2010 13:11:16 Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm searching for an automated solution that will split
> bigs emails in several parts ( as we do with mpack manually )
> then reassemble them at reception.
>
> It would be transparent for the user that would
> receive only one b
On Thursday 25 November 2010 17:12:22 Lukas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> >> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> >> messages.. Is it possible?
> >
> > Yes
>
> And how?
>
> >> It should be useful fo
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 16:58:34 mouss wrote:
> Le 22/11/2010 08:55, J. Roeleveld a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > There is only 1 email address causing issues, eg. am only rewriting that
> > specific one.
>
> if so, then simply use
>
> u...@list
On Saturday 20 November 2010 02:40:26 mouss wrote:
> Le 18/11/2010 10:15, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
> > * J. Roeleveld:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because
> >> the "
On Thursday 18 November 2010 15:20:47 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jerry:
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:14:28 +1100
> >
> > Bron Gondwana articulated:
> > > Yeah, we're on it. Seriously considering not being so strict
> > > about the domain name. There was stuff from Brad Fitzpatrick
> > > when LiveJou
On Thursday 18 November 2010 13:55:14 Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 3:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because
> > the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain
On Thursday 18 November 2010 11:04:23 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * J. Roeleveld :
> > On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:46:34 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > * J. Roeleveld :
> > > > My guess is header:
> > > No, envelope
> >
> > Ok, need
On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:46:34 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * J. Roeleveld :
> > My guess is header:
> No, envelope
Ok, need to read up on the actual difference between the two.
Thought "envelope" is the whole "history", eg. where the email has been. And
On Thursday 18 November 2010 10:15:19 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * J. Roeleveld :
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because
> > the "From" address contains an underscore in the domain name.
&g
Hi All,
I've been having issues where emails are being rejected by Cyrus because the
"From" address contains an underscore in the domain name.
Example address: u...@lists_example.org
What I am looking for is a way to parse email addresses and replace all
underscores to dashes, eg. the followin
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 03:15:31 junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
> .*
This will block all hosts, not just specific ones.
>
> --
> From: "Patrick Lists"
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 2:34 PM
> To:
> Subject: Regexp for blocking dynamic hosts?
On Friday 13 August 2010 19:58:38 Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/13/2010 8:22 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> >>> * Ram:
> >>>> Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
>
On Friday 13 August 2010 14:23:51 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > * Ram :
> > > Mail in plain text format , mime encoded message
> >
> > OK!
> >
> > > Currenlty I get 40/s - 45/s
> >
> > That sounds normal. Any filtering (in these cases you should inject in
> > a way that bypasses
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 06:39:16 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote:
> Thanks for the answer over a silly question J.Roeleveld.
There are no silly/stupid questions, only silly/stupid answers :)
> It was a firewall issue, I added rule for localhost to connect at port 25.
> Issue is resolved.
Even though I
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 13:09:02 Khawaja M. Jawad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using postfix + MailScanner + Mailwatch, Everything is working fine.
> postfix is relaying emails for all of my clients/domain, but I am unable to
> telnet localhost 25. Although I have allowed 127.0.0.0/8 range, listening
>
On Thursday 18 March 2010 13:26:43 Barney Desmond wrote:
> On 18 March 2010 21:57, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> 3. We read the report, and find things like "server exposes its
> hostname in the greeting banner", or "server appears to allow the use
> of the VRFY command".
Does this mean that the
On Thursday 04 March 2010 20:44:28 bruce wrote:
> hey
>
> new to configuring postfix, got a few questions about how to configure
> postfix.
>
> I'm running Centos/Fedora, with Postfix, from the basic yum install.
> The Sendmail process has been stopped.
>
> I can easily send a basic test mail f
On Thursday 04 March 2010 20:10:26 bruce wrote:
> hey
>
> new to configuring postfix, got a few questions
>
If you ask them, we can try to provide some answers?
On Thursday 04 March 2010 18:23:19 Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 11:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > True, but it is my understanding, please correct me if I am wrong, that
> > with Postfix, the BCC-option forces a copy of the email (regardless of
> > which user sent it)
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:57:02 Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 10:26 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> Interesting... yes, this is doable with dovecot if you are using its
> >> LDA, and you can do it via the global sieve script (which can be made
> >> mandato
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:10:21 Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 9:08 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> I am not familiar with Dovecot, but the above might be doable with
> >>> Dovecot as well.
> >>
> >> Does that mean I'd need a autosendfolde
On Thursday 04 March 2010 15:27:45 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> On Thursday 04 March 2010 14:55:59 you wrote:
> > 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > > J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM:
> > > > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On Thursday 04 March 2010 14:55:59 you wrote:
> 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM:
> > > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
>
>
> > > With that, I thought there is an option in postfix
On Thursday 04 March 2010 12:24:20 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> J. Roeleveld put forth on 3/4/2010 2:12 AM:
> > On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> >
> > With that, I thought there is an option in postfix to bcc a single
> > address on all email
On Thursday 04 March 2010 08:57:30 Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks for all the tips.
>
> Postfix and Dovecot are indeed on the same box and I do agree with you that
> it would require one heck of a hack to get this to work.
See below, it might be a "simple" configuration stil
On Friday 20 November 2009 17:01:56 Simon Waters wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2009 15:52:13 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > If it's a collection of different logfiles adding up to 4KB in size per
> > email, then you might want to recheck your syslog-configuration.
>
> Proba
On Friday 20 November 2009 14:53:58 Arora, Sumit wrote:
> I've checked the size of maillog
> It's size is getting increased by 4KB on receiving each email.
>
> Noel Jones, please read the other emails of this thread.
>
> -Sumit Arora
The log-entries you sent me are nowhere near 4KB in size.
stfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of J. Roeleveld Sent:
> Friday, November 20, 2009 6:51 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: 4KB of disk space burning on a single email
>
> On Friday 20 November 2009 14:14:03 Arora, Sumit wrote:
> &g
On Friday 20 November 2009 14:15:16 Alessandro Fachin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> sometimes (...) I need to trace the complete flow of mails through
> postfix queues until the delivered to dovecot (including the clients
> connections/disconnections and obviously the operations execute by
> Mailscanner).
ncrease.
Hopefully, this will reduce the possible locations to check for possible
locations.
--
Joost
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of J. Roeleveld Sent:
> Friday, November 20, 2009 6:
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:42:58 Arora, Sumit wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm just testing my postfix server for load and disk usage.
> I'm using content filter on some another server, and I don't feed the email
> back to postfix.
>
> Email data is getting deleted from my postfix server, but I don
38 matches
Mail list logo
