Michael Wang wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Michael Wang:
> [...snip...]
>>> Is 2.3 end-of-life coming any time soon?
>>
>> Updates for Postfix 2.2 stopped last year.
>
> So that sounds like 2.3 patches may end this year. Assuming that, I
> have (very) roughly 6 months + some unknown amount of t
Jan P. Kessler wrote:
>
> hapolicy (http://postfwd.org/DEVEL/tools/hapolicy-0.99.1) was developed
> to be small (~200 lines perl), simple and reliable. therefore it uses
> only basic perl modules and relies on postfix spawn. we run it since
> more than 6 months without problems to have a shared gre
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:15:07AM -0700, J Sloan wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is the benefit of doing it that way. But we experienced problems
>> with recurring corruption of the isam tables when the network connections
>> to the db server were interr
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>
> Sorry to hear that but in the mean time you can grab .src.rpm for a
> prior release, the tarball for the current release and modify the
> .spec file to reflect this.
I've been doing this for our smtp servers for some time. The suse
factory postfix srpm compiles nicel
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>
> What drawbacks did you experience? We run a local policyd instance on each
> postfix server too, all connecting to a central (not replicated) MySQL.
> Policyd's behaviour when MySQL becomes unavailable is configurable, it can
> either tempfail (4xx) all incoming e-mail o
Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> Google 'hapolicy synopsis' -- the author of postfwd wrote a perl
> script which acts as a load balancing policy service that can return
> dunno if the underlying services are unreachable. Obviously, if
> hapolicy itself malfunctions, you're back at square one.
Looks intere
Wietse Venema wrote:
> J Sloan:
>
>> Adrian Overbury wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
>>> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
>>> used) that, if it
Adrian Overbury wrote:
> Has anyone ever written a proxy server for policy services? I have a
> policy server (grossd, one of the best greylisting engines I've ever
> used) that, if it goes down, causes my Postfix servers to temp fail
> everything with 'Server configuration problem'. This is a re
Tashfeen Ekram wrote:
> I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my
> rails application. My rails application is not able to connect to it.
> Could this be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
> also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send
> emai
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/26/2009, Jim Wright (j...@wrightthisway.com) wrote:
>
>> Two options. 1, Eliminate windows users from your network.
>>
>
> Please... such comments are worse than useless...
>
>
It may not be what you want to hear, especially if you're heavily
invested in mi
For what it's worth, we've found ext3 to be far too slow for our needs.
The best setup we've found is reiserfs, mounted with "noatime" and
"notail" options -
Joe
Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Ralf Hildebrandt"
>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:52 AM
> Subje
Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>>> The policy table lookup key does not match the destination nexthop, or
>>>
>
>
>
> That's exactly the problem.
>
>
> I think you should be able to figure this out, even without reading the
> below, but if you are in a hurry try the documentation:
>
> ht
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:50:49PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>
>
>> We have just started doing business with a firm that uses an ironport
>> device, and discovered that postfix will not issue a STARTTLS to that
>> host, whether it's lis
We're seeing an odd problem with postfix TLS only when talking to an
ironport device. We configured smtp_tls_security_level = none and used
smtp_tls_policy_maps to set per site tls policy, rather than doing tls
by default.
This had worked perfectly for over months and many thousands of smtp
sessio
Sounds like fedora's missing a ca-bundle.crt...
Joe
sean darcy wrote:
> I followed the instructions on
> http://www.wormly.com/blog/2008/11/05/relay-gmail-google-smtp-postfix/
> to create your own certificate to use with google.
>
> main.cf:
> ..
> ## this to use certificate I created:
>
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, J Sloan wrote:
>
>> I find that having a local unix-based dns server is often orders of
>> magnitude faster than relying on an upstream isp for dns resolution.
>
> Joe,
>
> I don't know that the effort to set up and m
Rich Shepard wrote:
>
> Ah, so! That explains it. I run Dan Bernstein's dnscache here, but
> use my
> ISP's DNS servers otherwise.
>
> So, now I need to consider whether to remove the spamhaus line from
> main.cf or set up and maintain my own dns server.
>
I find that having a local unix-based
Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> I know, way OT, but has to be said:
>
> You think a linux bigot would use such a thing?
>
No need for name calling on this list. That sort of nonsense, if you've
simply got to say it, should have been said via pm.
Joe
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> Somewhat unrelated, but perhaps worth mentioning:
>
> For couple of years I've used RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com)
Weird, no linux version? oh well, useless to me.
Joe
Chris Turan wrote:
>
> Ouch, but you're right. I am creating my own misery. It wasn't a
> problem before when I was unknown to the spammers. Its only been a
> problem for a few weeks and I haven't yet been put on any blacklists.
Keep sending out backscatter spam, and you will most certainly end
Alexander Grüner wrote:
> > Open SUSE includes more recent posfix rpms (but in the "factory" not
> the repos):
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/postfix-2.5.5-6.6.x86_64.rpm
>
> >
> http://download.opensuse.org/factory/repo/oss/suse/i586/postfix-2.5.5-6.5.i586.rpm
>
> >
>
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
>
>> I don't know if this is a problem with Windows TCP/IP, or if this
>> is a problem with a firewall on the client side. Reportedly, some
>> firewalls randomize TCP sequence numbers but don't update the
>> sequence numbers in SACK fields. That would be a
Daniel V. Reinhardt wrote:
>
>
> Just to make sure I'm not crazy here, you can't get access to
> http://www.okean.com ?
>
> Links to screenshots of what I see ( right now )
> http://web56.net/images/download/screenshot1.jpg
> http://web56.net/images/download/screenshot2.jpg
>
That's interesting. I
mouss wrote:
> Joey a écrit :
>
>> One thing I didn't think of on this, is that the list from spamhaus will be
>> the same I am already rejecting via RBL and while it is local, it would
>> still not include all the IP's I am using from these other heavy spam
>> countries.
>>
>
>
> you can b
Perhaps you want mailx -
Joe
Ujjval K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thx for the reply..I have the "mail" Program, but it tries to
> use/usr/sbin/sendmail to send the email...
> Can that be configured to use postfix?
>
> thx
>
> --- On Thu, 10/2/08, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> From: Noel
Blake Carver wrote:
> So a few other details I've grabbed didn't provide yesterday-
> These numbers don't seem to add up.
> My big question is how do I get this system upgraded without breaking it?
>
> postconf -d | grep mail_version
> mail_version = 2.4.5
>
> and also
>
> rpm -qa | grep postfix
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
