Hello
ps -axww
is supposed to show the full command line
On 28.10.2024 21:08, Ken Gillett via Postfix-users wrote:
Does 'postconf daemon_directory' simply return info from the main.cf,
or does it query the running process to get exactly what is being used?
Yes, on MacOSX Server there are 2 e
Hello,
On 24.10.2024 08:24, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Yes, of course, as documented. TLS is off by default, this is
backwards-compatible behaviour, and Postfix aims to not "surprise"
operators with unexpected new behaviour after an upgrade. Default
settings are in part also the
, every machine that delivers
to the maildir must have its own hostname. Within one machine, every delivery
within the same second must have a different delivery identifier.
Get BlueMail for Android
On 11 Aug 2023, 03:35, at 03:35, H via Postfix-users
wrote:
>On 08/10/2023 01:25 AM, Eug
Best wishes
Eugene
Get BlueMail for Android
On 10 Aug 2023, 04:49, at 04:49, H via Postfix-users
wrote:
>On 07/31/2023 09:24 AM, Eugene R via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by
>the Ma
Magic )))
seriously, check the specs in the links I sent recently.
On 31.07.2023 16:34, Fourhundred Thecat via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2023-07-31 15:09, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2023-07-31 at 02:43:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:43:28 +0200)
1690633510.M94611123819.mail,S
But what is wrong with simply moving the message from one folder to
another in the mail client?
You can also use sieve scripts to automate retraining whatever mail
filter you use.
On 31.07.2023 16:52, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
Dnia 31.07.2023 o godz. 15:38:01 Fourhundred Thecat vi
wrote:
> On 2023-07-31 15:24, Eugene R via Postfix-users wrote:
Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by
the Maildir standard (and the Dovecot's extensions to it) to encode
various metadata such as message ID, size, flags, etc
https://en.wikipedi
Hello,
Those "ugly characters" are there for a reason: they are specified by
the Maildir standard (and the Dovecot's extensions to it) to encode
various metadata such as message ID, size, flags, etc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maildir
https://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
https://doc.dovecot.
But it seems that all the useful information is already shown in the
dovecot log line (unless we want to differentiate SASL vs IMAP auth
failures for some reason).
Eugene
On 17.05.2023 14:06, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2
Hello,
Am I correct that the string in question should normally contain the
SASL response? While the "Password:" is apparently some interactive
prompt, indicating that something might be wrong with the connection or
configuration?
Eugene
On 16.05.2023 17:06, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Hi Robin,
I once wrote a simple script that monitors network dump for outbound
connections and coordinates them with responsible process (with command
line) or HTTP access (with host and url) info. Maybe you will find it
useful.
(Should be very much FreeBSD-dependent).
Best wishes
Eugene
--
Hello,
Your mileage likely will be different, but I stopped using (content-based)
spam filtering tools altogether several years ago (previously used
SpamAssassin and then DSPAM) in favor of a (rather conservative) set of
Postfix smtpd restrictions (including Spamhaus DNSBL).
One of the reasons
Hello Iad,
I have a user who would like to receive a notification message on her
personal email account when she gets a new email message in > her
postfix - based MailDir. She does not want the actual message, just a ping
telling her to check her email.
I'm finding a lot info on Google that
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: li...@rhsoft.net
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 7:29 AM
> Actually the set I have is surprisingly effective and also surprisingly
> good in keeping FPs low -- much, much better than anything I saw from SA
> and DSPAM, and with virtually no server or m
Hello Noel,
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 12:20 AM
You want to conditionally run some extra restrictions based on the
outcome of prior restrictions? Some of the existing policy servers
do weighted scoring, which gives very similar results.
Co
Hi Noel,
-Original Message-
From: Noel Jones
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 11:29 PM
If you're rejecting good mail more than "rarely", you should
reevaluate your restrictions.
In particular, most built-in HELO checks are likely to reject legit
mail, and not terribly effective again
Hi all!
I have a fairly standard set of smtpd restrictions implemented and generally
I’m very happy with them (very low spam traffic and no headaches associated
with SpamAssassin or DSPAM).
However, once in a while a legitimate message is rejected because the other
side has misconfigured HELO
17 matches
Mail list logo
